<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ReligioRomana at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/</link>
    <description>Nova Roma&#39;s official forum for the discussion of the Religio Romana. Open to Citizens and non-Citizens. All topics directly rel</description>

    <item>
      <title>Renuntiatio Annua Collegii Pontificum</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:30:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>marcushoratius</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12461</guid>
      <description>M. Moravius Piscinus Horatianus Pontifex Maximus et Magister Collegii Augurum: M. Curiatio Complutensi M. Iulio Severo consilibus, Praetoribus, Tribunibus</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fwd:  Election in the Comitia Plebis Tributa</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:22:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rory12001</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12460</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12460</guid>
      <description>... Salvete omnes The contio for the election in the comitia plebis tributa shall begin November 9th at 0900 CET and last until November 13th at 1800 CET. The</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Use of Modern Terminology</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:03:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>C.Maria Caeca</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12459</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12459</guid>
      <description>Caeca Metello sal, et salvete omnes, I an neither an academician, nor an expert of any sort in religious reconstruction, so my comments come solely from what</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Use of Modern Terminology</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:29:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Quintus Caecilius Metellus</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12458</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12458</guid>
      <description>Saluete iterum. Let me add to that my apologies.  The Latin at the beginning of my last missive was incomplete and to be ignored.  I suppose it&#39;s another </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Use of Modern Terminology</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:01:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Quintus Caecilius Metellus</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12457</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12457</guid>
      <description>Saluete Omnes. collegio studiens quaedam scripta inueniebam quae dignum esse conloquari in hoc foro censeo.  quod demonstrabo est exemplum certum, a quo</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Posting Standards</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:27:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>S. Aleksandr Normandy</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12456</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12456</guid>
      <description>Saluete, Though it has been an ongoing process, ten days have passed since the last individual was placed on moderation for acting against the expectations of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Differences in the Iura Sacra</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:15:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>S. Aleksandr Normandy</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12455</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12455</guid>
      <description>Saluete Omnes, As I was considering a passage in Gellius (Noc. Att., 14.7.9), I found that I&#39;m not sure whether it belongs in the category of the ius augurale </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R: [ReligioRomana] Re: Roman Music</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:10:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>M. Iulius Cicurinus</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12454</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12454</guid>
      <description>Salve Lentulus,    Interesting story, the melody was very pleasant to listen to, who are you on the video? I saw three men there - one is all in white,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R: [ReligioRomana] Re: Roman Music</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:07:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>M. Iulius Cicurinus</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12453</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12453</guid>
      <description>Thank you Metellus, I think I&#39;ll join the Sodalitas Musarum group then, and be on the look out for anything that involves music. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R: [ReligioRomana] Re: Roman Music</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:36:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Quintus Caecilius Metellus</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12452</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12452</guid>
      <description>Metellus Lentulo Omnibusque sal. I&#39;m just about to leave for work again, but I can&#39;t leave this unanswered, even if only in small part.  Lentulus said,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>R: [ReligioRomana] Re: Roman Music</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:09:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Cn. Cornelius Lentulus</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12451</guid>
      <description>Lentulus pontifex Cicurino sal. Salve, Cicurine! ... I am happy people see these recordings and find them useful! :) ... There is no such group in Nova Roma</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re : [ReligioRomana] Re: Roman Law and Cato</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:09:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Cato</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12449</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12449</guid>
      <description>Cato Philippo Galluico sal. Salve. Actually, according to Plutarch&#39;s &quot;Roman Questions&quot;, the *only* priesthood that was viewed as sacrosanct - and whose priests</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Roman Law et al.</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:53:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Q. Caecilius Metellus</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12448</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12448</guid>
      <description>Q Caecilius Metellus Omnibus salutem. Saluete Omnes. As I did previously, I will ask again.  At this point, anyone who has continued to use the subject line</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re : [ReligioRomana] Re: Roman Law and Cato the Ignorant</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:49:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MaitrePhilipposhelios Maitre</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12447</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12447</guid>
      <description>but in the case of the PM or any magistrat with imperium isn&#39; t throught back to the personn who hold the offices? why Augustus sid not dimisse the PM lepidus</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re : [ReligioRomana] Re: Roman Law and Cato the Ignorant</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:53:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Cato</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12446</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligioRomana/message/12446</guid>
      <description>Cato Philippo Gallico sal. Salve. Auspices were taken, the Senate convened and voted.  Suddenly, with the outcome of the vote having gone against them,</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Thu Dec  3 11:08:16 PST 2009 -->
