<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ReligiousPhilosophy at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/</link>
    <description>The Threshing Floor</description>

    <item>
      <title>Mysteriousness of Too Many Mysteries -- Solved! </title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 00:10:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Albert Cipriani</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/90</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/90</guid>
      <description>Steve wrote: &quot;Here&#39;s one for you and I to hash out....The Luminous Mysteries of the Rosary.  I can&#39;t think of a single reason NOT to include these mysteries in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Free Will &amp; Eternal Punishment</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 04:52:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Albert Cipriani</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/89</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/89</guid>
      <description>Lex asserts: &quot;God&#39;s omniscience and Man&#39;s free will are irreconcilable.&quot; Just because God knows who WILL go to hell does not mean He WILLS them to go to hell.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Subjectivity, Objectivity, Faith, &amp; God</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 02:46:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Albert Cipriani</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/88</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/88</guid>
      <description>Lex retorts: &quot;So belief is purely subjective?  God isn&#39;t absolute and objective?&quot; No, and no. Subjectivity and objectivity are at the opposite poles of a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Arguing Against Atheism</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:00:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Albert Cipriani</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/87</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/87</guid>
      <description>Lex writes: &quot;I think that the strongest and most repeated argument against the existence of God is Occam&#39;s razor. Why can&#39;t we just accept that the Universe</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Short Answeres to Big Questions</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 05:11:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Albert Cipriani</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/86</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/86</guid>
      <description>Lex asked: &quot;Why do you believe in God? (I know I already asked this before)&quot; Because the alternative is personally unsatisfying, seems rationally irrational,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Become a Traditionalist</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 04:11:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Albert Cipriani</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/85</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/85</guid>
      <description>Asimis wrote: &quot;I find myself going back and forth between accepting Vatican II and it&#39;s teachings or rejecting it and sticking to the pre-Vatican II</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is VCII Infallible? Part III</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 02:41:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Albert Cipriani</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/84</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/84</guid>
      <description>Asimis wrote: &quot;Taking the words of the Second Vatican Council by themselves, it seems obvious that the council does bear the mark of infallibility... I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is VCII Infallible? Part II</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:07:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Albert Cipriani</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/83</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/83</guid>
      <description>Asimis wrote: &quot;Taking the words of the Second Vatican Council by themselves, it seems obvious that the council does bear the mark of infallibility.&quot; I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is VCII Infallible?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 01:32:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Albert Cipriani</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/82</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/82</guid>
      <description>Asismis asked: &quot;If Vatican II is infallible and the council itself says that it is pastoral then is it not an infallible statement made by the infallible</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Adam &amp; Eve &amp; Evolution</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2004 07:21:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Albert Cipriani</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/81</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/81</guid>
      <description>Asimis wrote: &quot;If mainstream geology and evolution is true then: There was death and suffering before the fall.&quot; Yes.  And this would seem to contradict our</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sedevacantism #2</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2004 19:49:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Albert Cipriani</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/80</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/80</guid>
      <description>Earl wrote: &quot;It is also difficult for me to not have my two feet squarely planted in complete agreement with my avowed faith. Therefore, I must come down on</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sedevacantism</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2004 00:24:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Albert Cipriani</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/79</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/79</guid>
      <description>This citation by Bellarmine sums up my view of the matter: &quot;A pope who is a manifest heretic automatically ceases to be pope and head, just as he ceases</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Christianity is an Heretical Sect of Catholicism #3</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 04:09:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Albert Cipriani</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/78</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/78</guid>
      <description>Derrick wrote: &quot;I can&#39;t believe any participants of the Jewish Faith would agree with that [my premise that Catholicism is a fulfillment of Judaism], nor the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Christianity is an Heretical Sect of Catholicism #2</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 03:49:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Albert Cipriani</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/77</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/77</guid>
      <description>Javad argues: &quot;The distortion of any [Divine] message would be a work of humanity coming directly from man&#39;s freewill.  Thus the Deity would need to resend the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Christianity is an Heretical Sect of Catholicism</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:33:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Albert Cipriani</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/76</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ReligiousPhilosophy/message/76</guid>
      <description>Just as how Catholicism derived from Judaism and Islam derived from them both, &quot;Christianity&quot; (the appellation has been expropriated by Protestants to mean</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Tue Nov 24 10:44:00 PST 2009 -->
