SarfattiScienceSeminars at Yahoo! Groups

Re: imaginary weapons & John Gibbons, President Clinton's science ad

JACK SARFATTI — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:54:17 GMT

strange synchronicity http://www.johnhgibbons.org/ Gibbons was science advisor to President Clinton.

Fwd: [Mind and Brain] More on the speed of light anomalies

Jack Sarfatti — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:57:27 GMT

Begin forwarded message: From: "David M. Rountree" Date: January 4, 2010 11:26:44 AM PST To: Subject:

Fwd: The science of time travel

JACK SARFATTI — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:50:17 GMT

... Begin forwarded message: From: antigray@... Date: January 4, 2010 2:06:15 PM PST To: marssouthpolereturns@yahoogroups.com Cc: UFOpro@yahoogroups.com ,

Fwd: Was Our Universe Created By a Collision With a Parallel Univers

JACK SARFATTI — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:57:15 GMT

i don't like this idea but maybe

Fwd: The real Frankenstein experiment: One man's mission to create a

JACK SARFATTI — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:54:45 GMT

Re: Z's "work" -- Reply to Sarfatti's Clueless Comments

JACK SARFATTI — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 09:30:51 GMT

PS ... This is nonsense. For one thing there are no global coordinate charts in curved spacetime. For another, the criterion for "acceleration" of a local

Re: Z's "work" -- Reply to Sarfatti's Clueless Comments

JACK SARFATTI — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 09:23:50 GMT

You are completely confused. The Levi-Civita connection is zero at the origins of each LIF. ... has no physical meaning the only physical observable intrinsic

Re: Z's "work" -- Reply to Sarfatti's Clueless Comments

JACK SARFATTI — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 04:17:52 GMT

the problem is you are not even wrong ... the problem is you are not even wrong On Jan 3, 2010, at 8:12 PM, Paul Zielinski wrote: This is pretty clear cut

Re: Z's "work" -- Reply to Sarfatti's Clueless Comments

JACK SARFATTI — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 04:16:27 GMT

i don't think so, but I can't change your delusion ... i don't think so, but I can't change your delusion On Jan 3, 2010, at 7:44 PM, Paul Zielinski wrote: No

Re: Z's "work" -- Reply to Sarfatti's Clueless Comments

JACK SARFATTI — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 03:35:48 GMT

i am busy with other concerns for now ... i am busy with other concerns for now On Jan 3, 2010, at 7:24 PM, Paul Zielinski wrote: Jack says, "{LC}flatGIF = 0"

Re: Z's "work" -- Reply to Sarfatti's Clueless Comments

JACK SARFATTI — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 01:21:10 GMT

... What is ρ? You should define your arcane symbols. Is that your deformation tensor? If so, your statement is ludicrous. ... On Jan 3, 2010, at 4:56 PM,

Re: Z's "work" -- Reply to Sarfatti's Clueless Comments

JACK SARFATTI — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 01:16:56 GMT

... I know you think that. That proves you do not understand the physical meaning of the math. ... always ... On Jan 3, 2010, at 4:56 PM, Paul Zielinski wrote:

Re: Z's "work"

JACK SARFATTI — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 18:30:48 GMT

Paul you are as delusional as Gordon Novel, though not violent at least. What you write below is word salad. I will write up a well-intentioned paper in

Z's "work"

JACK SARFATTI — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 07:57:25 GMT

Dear Z Your abstract words are unintelligible because you never properly define your jargon and you never work out an example that is correct and relevant. You

Re: [Mind and Brain] Re: Dr. Quantum Through The Wormhole, The Night

JACK SARFATTI — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 04:29:12 GMT

Comments on this? I only read part of it so far. The device? ... Comments on this? I only read part of it so far. The device? Begin forwarded message: From: