<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SeaFunc at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/</link>
    <description>SeaFunc</description>

    <item>
      <title>Interested in writing clojure for work?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:23:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dysinger</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/800</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/800</guid>
      <description>We need to hire some more devs full time to work on a clojure project (distributed backend hardcore clojure - not web dev). I would prefer to have someone in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Call for Participation 2009 Commercial Users of Functional Programmi</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:51:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jim Grundy</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/799</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/799</guid>
      <description>Commercial Users of Functional Programming Workshop (CUFP) 2009 Functional Programming As a Means, Not an End Call for Participation Sponsored by SIGPLAN </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: computer language comparisons (expressivity vs speed)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:08:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alan Mortensen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/798</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/798</guid>
      <description>I think one way to deal with the problem of high speed but ugly code would be to change the acceptance criterion.  Instead of just keeping the fastest solution</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: computer language comparisons (expressivity vs speed)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:51:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Brandon Van Every</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/797</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/797</guid>
      <description>... The benchmarks seem to be saying that some bottlenecks are not going to be optimized away, at least not in the languages themselves.  I guess if one</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: computer language comparisons (expressivity vs speed)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 06:57:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan Leonard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/796</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/796</guid>
      <description>... Good point.  As I mentioned in another recent post it seems a bit disingenuous to use these programs as measures of &#39;expressivity&#39; in that case. ... Yep,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: computer language comparisons (expressivity vs speed)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:56:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan Leonard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/795</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/795</guid>
      <description>P.S.  If it weren&#39;t obvious from my last mail, I didn&#39;t realize that each &#39;language community&#39; submitted its own codes.  For some reason, I had figured there</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: computer language comparisons (expressivity vs speed)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:54:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan Leonard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/794</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/794</guid>
      <description>Yes, but look good in terms of performance or code size?  I&#39;d prefer shorter easier to maintain codes with bottlenecks optimized away where required. Given</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: computer language comparisons (expressivity vs speed)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 02:38:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mitchell Johnson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/793</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/793</guid>
      <description>... I think that&#39;s actually an interesting component to &quot;The Game&quot;. Usually people writing in language X have an incentive to make their language look good.  I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: computer language comparisons (expressivity vs speed)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 02:12:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Shachaf Ben-Kiki</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/792</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/792</guid>
      <description>... I think it&#39;s important to remember that these programs were optimized for speed; very few of them, if any, are written the way one would normally write a </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: computer language comparisons (expressivity vs speed)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:20:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan Leonard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/791</guid>
      <description>It does have its problems though.  For one, it is at the mercy of each individual implementor and not all implementors are created equal in all languages. For</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: computer language comparisons (expressivity vs speed)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:59:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mitchell Johnson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/790</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/790</guid>
      <description>That is a really great visualization of the benchmarks game -- seems to really answer the question. Another question I would like to ask the benchmarks game</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>computer language comparisons (expressivity vs speed)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:22:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan Leonard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/789</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/789</guid>
      <description>Given our discussion of what makes a good language last meeting [and the general interest in language amongst FPers], I thought I&#39;d share this quantitative</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: notes from 2009-05-27</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:39:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan Leonard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/788</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/788</guid>
      <description>I think the &#39;Unlambda&#39; one is just a joke thrown in for free (although it&#39;s technically still an FP, no)? ;-)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Reminder: Mtg Wed May 27 at Ralph&#39;s grocery</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:37:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mark Engelberg</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/787</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/787</guid>
      <description>That could work for me, especially if it&#39;s some place with easy parking.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: notes from 2009-05-27</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 07:09:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ashley Yakeley</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/786</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeaFunc/message/786</guid>
      <description>... &quot;Renstat (sp?) company in Portland hiring FP jobs&quot; That would be Rentrak. They&#39;ve been posting on CraigsList, for instance </description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Jul  5 20:36:09 PDT 2009 -->
