<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SearchCoP at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/</link>
    <description>Search Community of Practice</description>

    <item>
      <title>Enterprise Search Cafe - Sydney 23rd March</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:52:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt Moore</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/349</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/349</guid>
      <description>Search engine software is everywhere. &quot;Google&quot; is now a verb and corporate users expect their internal search experience to be as impressive as the web. And</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Event) Taxonomy for Social Software - February 3 Taxonomy Community</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:42:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rebecca Allen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/348</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/348</guid>
      <description>Invitation Please join us for our monthly Taxonomy Community of Practice Call, presented by Earley &amp; Associates. This month&#39;s topic is Taxonomy for Social</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cost/Benefit model for best bets?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:42:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Walter Underwood</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/347</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/347</guid>
      <description>Just beware of always jumping to Best Bets. That only solves it for one page. That&#39;s probably the right answer for &quot;snow policy&quot;, but not for everything. Your</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cost/Benefit model for best bets?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:49:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>tbwendt</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/346</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/346</guid>
      <description>Best Bets are essential for enterprise search.  The movies title scenario is a different animal and not analogous to the corporate intranet.  When you are</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cost/Benefit model for best bets?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:56:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Louis Rosenfeld</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/345</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/345</guid>
      <description>... Argh.  You have my deepest sympathies. I imagine that, like me, you&#39;re looking forward to a New Day, when those who make these decisions understand that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cost/Benefit model for best bets?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Walter Underwood</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/344</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/344</guid>
      <description>No tool is perfect. Best Bets have an obvious strength, direct control, but weaknesses, too. Here are some weaknesses: 1. They fix one query at a time. You&#39;ll</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cost/Benefit model for best bets?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:16:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt Moore</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/343</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/343</guid>
      <description>Jordan - &quot;Enjoying this discussion though I recently was unsuccessful in getting &#39;best bets&#39; added to our site search experience with the argument that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cost/Benefit model for best bets?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:34:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jordan Cassel</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/342</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/342</guid>
      <description>Richard, Are you suggesting that Best Bets (with the notation that they are best bet results) should be created for all of the most popular X number of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cost/Benefit model for best bets?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:40:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Richard Wiggins</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/341</guid>
      <description>Walter, who is wickedly smart and whose words I normally trust with impunity, is wrong. Best Bets are NOT expensive.  The Zipf curve proves that a very small</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cost/Benefit model for best bets?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:42:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Walter Underwood</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/340</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/340</guid>
      <description>Good point, best bets are manual, and therefore expensive. I use best bets to solve a specific problem in search behavior and linguistics, that people use a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cost/Benefit model for best bets?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:55:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Louis Rosenfeld</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/339</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/339</guid>
      <description>Hi Lee, great question; thanks for bringing this up! I&#39;ve not seen anything on developing a best bets cost benefit model.  I know that some folks would argue</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cost/Benefit model for best bets?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:09:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Lee Romero</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/338</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/338</guid>
      <description>Hi all - I&#39;m wondering if anyone might have considered how to establish a model that provides some insight on the cost and benefits of managing best bets</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Event) Taxonomy for Personalization - January 6th Taxonomy Communit</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:48:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rebecca Allen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/337</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/337</guid>
      <description>Invitation Please join us for our monthly Taxonomy Community of Practice Call, presented by Earley &amp; Associates. This month&#39;s topic is Taxonomy for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Event) Digital Asset Management: Free webinar series January 14 - F</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:43:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rebecca Allen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/336</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/336</guid>
      <description>Earley &amp; Associates presents a free 4-part Jumpstart webinar series dedicated to the strategic, organizational and technological challenges of Digital Asset</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analyzing search result counts</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:51:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Lee Romero</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/335</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SearchCoP/message/335</guid>
      <description>Hi all - I have a question about what kind of analysis you might have tried with data about the # of search results user queries return (if anything). We have</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Mar 28 11:41:51 PDT 2010 -->
