http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/ SimpleORM Sun, 17 Jan 2010 04:00:30 GMT anthony@... http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1859 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1859 PS. The source code to SimpleOrm really is quite simple. So if you have the source attached to your IDE, and then look inside, you will quickly see that it Sun, 17 Jan 2010 03:56:59 GMT anthony@... http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1858 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1858 Hello Guenter, That is actually the documented behavior:- /** * Inserts (or updates) one record in the databases, and returns it. The * first element(s) in Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:45:39 GMT Guenter Wildmann http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1857 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1857 Hello! I think there is a problem in SDataLoader. I have one table that looks like: A (String, PK, FK) B (Integer) C (Integer, PK) D (Integer, PK) (This is a Sat, 09 Jan 2010 06:03:50 GMT berglas@... http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1856 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1856 Wicket seems to be mainly about adding components to a HTML page. But my take is that in real development the HTML gets abstracted away. Somewhere you have a Sat, 09 Jan 2010 01:29:19 GMT Eric Schwarzenbach http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1855 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1855 Have you looked at Wicket or Lift? Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:07:08 GMT berglas@... http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1854 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1854 Simplets is a good approach, but it needs significant work. SimpleWebApp can do it, but it uses JSPs which is bad. Ruby can do quick and dirty, but Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:17:36 GMT John Abraham http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1853 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1853 My current plan A is to use Ruby and Rails. New direction for me, but seems the easiest for rapid deployment. Other suggestions still more than welcome! -- Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:40:07 GMT John Abraham http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1852 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1852 I'm wanting to build some UI for my database. Just some forms, really. It's postgresql. Since I use SimpleORM, I thought to look into SimpleWebApp. I see Sat, 19 Dec 2009 08:34:12 GMT Guenter Wildmann http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1851 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1851 Hello Anthony, hello Franck, Thank you, i now understand the 3.x concept for foreign keys. Ciao, Guenter Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:06:13 GMT Franck Routier http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1850 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1850 Hi, as Anthony pointed it Payroll is a good example. You won't use the SFieldReference itself as part of the empoyee's pk, but will use the SFieldScalar used Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:30:12 GMT berglas@... http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1849 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1849 Just mark the referencing columns as part of the foreign key. Under Franck's simplification there is no longer any nesting of foreign keys. Have a look at Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:45:31 GMT Guenter Wildmann http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1848 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1848 Hello! How do i define a foreign key as a part of the primary key? For the Empoyee-example this would mean the reference to the department would be part of the Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:03:50 GMT anthony@... http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1847 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1847 Not normally necessary. And locking is about more than Synchronized. Unlike most software, SimpleORM takes care to try to fail fast if you have threading Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:35:44 GMT abel birya http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1846 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1846 Hello Anthony, Thanks for the reply and I have to say I do understand exactly what you mean. What I am really concerned with is whether I may have to write Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:22:08 GMT anthony@... http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1845 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/message/1845 If you have non-trivial queries for MSSQL try UPDATE STATISTICS on the main tables. I have found that sometimes it just looses track and starts running slowly