<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SocietyforClassicalPhysics at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/</link>
    <description>Society for Classical Physics</description>

    <item>
      <title>Sub-ground states for other 1 electron atoms</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:17:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>amack43</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/770</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/770</guid>
      <description>Can there be subground states for all 1 electron species? I can&#39;t think of any reason why there shouldn&#39;t be, even if they were harder to synthesize. And if</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gone for a week</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:11:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Farrell</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/769</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/769</guid>
      <description>Hi all, I will be out of town for a week.  I will not be taking mu computer with me. Thanks ... John Farrell, Moderator</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: artificial electromagnetic black hole</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:47:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>novel_compound</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/768</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/768</guid>
      <description>PhysOrg.com wrote, &lt;&lt; Two physicists in China have used meta-materials to create the first artificial electromagnetic black hole. &gt;&gt; I&#39;m afraid I&#39;m not too</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fifth force paper</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:47:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>usnavyfish</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/767</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/767</guid>
      <description>Fascinating ideas.  I&#39;ve often found myself wondering if these fundamental constants weren&#39;t so constant after all.  Your post got me thinking about the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fifth force paper</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 00:06:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ClintH</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/766</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/766</guid>
      <description>As quoted from Mills&#39; &quot;Fifth Force paper&quot;, &quot;The invariant speed c is set by the permittivity and permeability of absolute space that determines the relativity</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>artificial electromagnetic black hole</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:14:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ClintH</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/765</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/765</guid>
      <description>(PhysOrg.com) -- Two physicists in China have used meta-materials to create the first artificial electromagnetic black hole. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dark matter</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:28:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mixent@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/764</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/764</guid>
      <description>In reply to  Peter Wolstenholme&#39;s message of Sun, 4 Oct 2009 00:59:25 -0700 (PDT): Hi, At least some of the anomaly may be explained IMO by the fact that a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dark matter</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:07:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter Wolstenholme</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/763</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/763</guid>
      <description> Perhaps Dr. Mills would have a few minutes to comment on dark matter. Very recent studies, reported in Nature, New Scientist etc.  have shown a strange</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Viral Theorem</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:12:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Farrell</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/762</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/762</guid>
      <description>Mark, I am familiar with the expansion of the ideal gas law as a power series. Of course, no gas is ideal because real gases have interactions between the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Viral Theorem</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:42:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>opticalphysicist06</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/761</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/761</guid>
      <description>John, The ideal gas law can be expanded as a power series in (n/v). This equation is also called the viral equation.  I hypothesize that the higher order</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Viral Theorem</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:59:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Farrell</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/760</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/760</guid>
      <description>Optical Physicist, Because no one else has responded I will give it a try. I don&#39;t know of anyone who disputes the virial theorem.  What misunderstandings of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Expansion and Contraction of the Universe</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:38:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>amack43</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/759</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/759</guid>
      <description>... snipped I appreciate they are a distraction from the principal effort of getting a working reactor up and running (and God knows I want to see some of the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Viral Theorem</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:49:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>opticalphysicist06</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/758</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/758</guid>
      <description>The viral theorem of classical physics was developed in the 1880&#39;s.  Other researchers have derived this theorem for radial potentials and in recent decades</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Expansion and Contraction of the Universe</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:13:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Farrell</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/757</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/757</guid>
      <description>Antony, Good questions. ?	I don&#39;t know if all matter will be converted to photons.  Your list of physical species that might remain is fine.  If someone</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The fate of H(1/3)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:55:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>amack43</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/756</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/message/756</guid>
      <description>... snipped I have the &quot;final resting place&quot; in quotes ... Dr. Farrell surely all matter won&#39;t convert to photons? I understand the overall concept of CP&#39;s</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Tue Dec  1 21:14:12 PST 2009 -->
