SocietyforClassicalPhysics at Yahoo! Groups

Work prior to Einstein!

opticalphysicist06 — Tue, 21 May 2013 11:43:50 GMT

Does this change your view of science history? http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?13720-Was-Einstein-a-fraud Also, Einstein's first wife, Telsa's

Re: Protected chemical compounds

Mike Carrell — Mon, 20 May 2013 14:44:32 GMT

Compounds are patentable: it is what pharmaceutical companies thrive on. Hydrinos as such are not. Mills has pointed out that they occur in nature, and indeed

Re: Protected chemical compounds

amack43 — Mon, 20 May 2013 12:05:48 GMT

I had not heard of the GMO ruling. It sounds ridiculous. Did they charge the bees involved with corporate espionage? I fully support commerce and patent rights

Re: Protected chemical compounds

mixent@... — Sat, 18 May 2013 23:33:42 GMT

In reply to Luke's message of Sat, 18 May 2013 15:49:36 -0000: Hi, [snip] ... This ruling was an abomination, and should never have been allowed to stand. It

Re: Protected chemical compounds

mixent@... — Sat, 18 May 2013 23:33:33 GMT

In reply to novel_compound's message of Sat, 18 May 2013 06:03:43 -0000: Hi, But do they receive protection on the actual compounds themselves, or the method

Re: Protected chemical compounds

Luke — Sat, 18 May 2013 17:24:13 GMT

... << At first I too thought that a patent could not protect a chemical compound. But actually it can: the pharmaceutical industry regularly receives patent

Protected chemical compounds

novel_compound — Sat, 18 May 2013 13:16:58 GMT

Robin wrote, << I don't think patents don't offer that sort of protection. >> At first I too thought that a patent could not protect a chemical compound. But

Re: On the other hand...

Mike Carrell — Fri, 17 May 2013 16:06:34 GMT

Patent law varies from country to country. Early attempts to patent were blocked by a)general disbelief that hydrinos exist according to accepted physics. Or,

Re: On the other hand...

mixent@... — Fri, 17 May 2013 09:37:55 GMT

In reply to amack43's message of Fri, 17 May 2013 01:47:38 -0000: Hi, [snip] ... I don't think patents don't offer that sort of protection. You can protect

Re: On the other hand...

amack43 — Fri, 17 May 2013 01:55:38 GMT

The Compounds are proprietary and protected by international patent. If an individual or company wants to use and sell them for specific purposes they'd

On the other hand...

novel_compound — Fri, 17 May 2013 00:18:44 GMT

amack43 wrote, << The business model may need to be adapted. For instance, if build up and collection of hydrides requires frequent maintenance, service of

Re: Orbitspheres and Geodesic domes

Eric Hermanson — Thu, 16 May 2013 17:57:42 GMT

Why not print one using a 3D printer and test it. Eric

Orbitspheres and Geodesic domes

amack43 — Thu, 16 May 2013 12:40:20 GMT

There is perhaps another option. If one could create a shell and evacuate the air inside it and the weight of the displaced air was greater than the weight of

Re: Safety Query on prolonged operation of CIHT

mixent@... — Thu, 16 May 2013 02:26:04 GMT

In reply to amack43's message of Wed, 15 May 2013 01:10:34 -0000: Hi, [snip] ... That was fascinating. I would add that larger balloons would be more

Not a superior lifting gas

novel_compound — Thu, 16 May 2013 02:25:51 GMT

amack43 wrote, << As for balloons, using dihydrino might be troublesome as the smaller radius of H2(1/n) might escape more readily from the balloon material.