<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Sophism at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/</link>
    <description>Sophism</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Connotation of &quot;Sophism and Sophistry&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:12:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>wallacecollect</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/126</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/126</guid>
      <description>The Sophists are usually differentiated from the Prescocratic natural scientists such as Thales as well as from the Pythagoreans. Protagoras is reckoned to be</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Connotation of &quot;Sophism and Sophistry&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:40:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Kyle Victor Jose</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/125</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/125</guid>
      <description>I was told that Sophists was a group of Pre-socratic philosophers such as Thales, Anaximander, Pythagoras, etc. Then why are the logical fallacies the praxes</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Essay Question</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:40:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>wallacecollect</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/124</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/124</guid>
      <description>My hero in the Republic is Thrasymachus - he really tears Socrates to shreds, despite Plato&#39;s biased treatment [see Rep Book 1] ... &lt;zilbo77@y...&gt; ... sophists</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Protagoras the Sophist</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 01:06:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>tonguessy</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/122</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/122</guid>
      <description>Michel Onfray in his &quot;Les Sagesses Antiques&quot; (2006) clearly says it: Plato&#39;s dictatorship has managed to give HIS deceitful impression of old Sophists as the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Protagoras the Sophist</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:47:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>edelagarza_12</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/121</guid>
      <description>One does not need to go far to find out how the Sophists were viewed and are currently viewed. Type Sophist into any search engine on the internet and you are</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hi friends,</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 04:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gary Geiser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/120</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/120</guid>
      <description>Your boredom can&#39;t be helped. It&#39;s an effect of the disappearance of the social. Genuine reciprocity is gone. Now it&#39;s all just ambiance afforded by </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi friends,</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 04:31:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>anusha suddana</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/119</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/119</guid>
      <description>Friends lets raise some topics and discuss.there are no posts and i am getting bored in this group. ok. SOPHISM is a great word let us be sophists :-)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Something about Nothing</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:01:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tor Hershman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/118</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/118</guid>
      <description>Moi&#39;s lyrics (Mostly satire and parody) are THE least ambiguous [Well, you may tie moi but exceed.....never!] of any. Have a look/see, hear/listen if&#39;in ya</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Something about Nothing</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 02:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gary Geiser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/117</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/117</guid>
      <description>There are facts that we share which are of questionable validity, but we are unaware of it. And these facts often serve to end theoretical discussion. But how</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Something about Nothing</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Lechesis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/116</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/116</guid>
      <description>It seems that some songwriters overcome Husserl &amp; Derrida&#39;s ideas by creating phrases which are ambiguous to a first reading, but are in their construction,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Something about Nothing</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 06:14:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gary Geiser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/115</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/115</guid>
      <description>But don&#39;t forget that while Husserl posited a &#39;presence&#39; afforded by our pre-reflective awareness of consciousness, Derrida later on has posited langauge over</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Something about Nothing</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:23:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Lechesis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/114</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/114</guid>
      <description>Thank You. I have been searching for the answer to this riddle for a lifetime. I am a first year philosophy student and gladly accept your argument. Namaste </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Something about Nothing</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:16:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gary Geiser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/113</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/113</guid>
      <description>This is phenomenology. There is something &quot;like&quot; every experience we have, namely the absolute stream of consciousness, the &#39;feel&#39; of experience. What IS &quot;at</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Something about Nothing</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 03:24:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Lechesis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/112</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/112</guid>
      <description>If I think of Nothing, then how is it possible for nothing to exist. If I have thought of it, then at least to me there IS nothing rather than nothing being</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: hi</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 02:42:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gary Geiser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/111</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sophism/message/111</guid>
      <description>Hi, There&#39;s a filter. So if you send something in, it&#39;s got a small chance of getting through. I suppose people just gave up. But what is Sophism. It&#39;s</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Feb 14 10:21:55 PST 2010 -->
