<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>StudyRoomMD at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/</link>
    <description>Matt Diougardi&#39;s Study Room</description>

    <item>
      <title>Notes on Katz&#39;s Metaphysics of Meaning, 2.7</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 20:42:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt Dioguardi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/62</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/62</guid>
      <description>Notes on Jerrold J. Katz&#39;s _Metaphysics of Meaning_, section 2.7 1a. In PI 1-15, W equates facts about language with facts about use. 1b. Katz raises the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Katz&#39;s Metaphysics of Meaning, 2.6</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 21:21:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt Dioguardi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/61</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/61</guid>
      <description>Notes on section 2.6 All &quot;&quot; are Katz, unless otherwise specified. My opinions in []. 1a. Katz asserts that PI 1-4 is basically an attack on theories of meaning</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Katz&#39;s Metaphysics of Meaning, 2.3</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2003 21:14:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt Dioguardi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/60</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/60</guid>
      <description>Notes on Section 2.3 Katz quotes in &quot;&quot;. 1a. &quot;The line of theoretical development I will initiate is in the sharpest possible conflict with Wittgenstein&#39;s</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Katz&#39;s Metaphysics of Meaning, 2.1, 2.2</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2003 21:48:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt Dioguardi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/59</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/59</guid>
      <description>Notes on Jerrold Katz&#39;s Metaphysics of Meaning Chapter 2 Wittgenstein&#39;s Critique of Theories of Meaning Unless specified otherwise, comments in &quot;&quot; are Katz&#39;s. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Popper quote on scientific ethics</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2003 00:05:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt Dioguardi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/58</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/58</guid>
      <description>[Just typed this quote up for purposes my own, but thought it couldn&#39;t hurt to send it to the different Popper forums ...] The hope of getting some argument or</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Katz&#39;s Metaphysics of Meaning, 1.2</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2003 20:24:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt Dioguardi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/57</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/57</guid>
      <description>Okay. In section 1.1 Katz stated: 1. Frege attempted to make theories about meanings, which were used by later thinkers in an attempt to separate the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [CR] Katz&#39;s Metaphysics of Meaning - 1.1</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2003 20:24:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt Dioguardi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/56</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/56</guid>
      <description>More notes from section 1.1 Some quotes are Katz on W, some are W. I&#39;ve tried to mark them accordingly. Sorry for any confusion. My comments in []. Two</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Popper on moral decision making</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 03:12:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt Dioguardi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/55</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/55</guid>
      <description>&quot;As we have seen before (in chapter 5), and now again in our analysis of the uncritical version of rationalism, arguments cannot determine such a fundamental</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Popper on moral decision making</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 03:04:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt Dioguardi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/54</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/54</guid>
      <description>&quot;As we have seen before (in chapter 5), and now again in our analysis of the uncritical version of rationalism, arguments cannot determine such a fundamental</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Katz&#39;s Metaphysics of Meaning - 1.1</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 20:57:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt Dioguardi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/53</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/53</guid>
      <description>Notes on chapter 1, section 1 Comments not directly pertaining to the text are in []s. &quot;More than any other philosopher in the century, Wittgenstein was </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Metaphysics of Meaning - reading notes</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 03:27:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt Dioguardi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/52</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/52</guid>
      <description>The following are some notes for the _Metaphysics of Meaning_ by Jarrold J. Katz. A review for the book can be found at: http://www.friesian.com/katz.htm I&#39;ll</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Popper&#39;s recantation about Darwinism as a tautology</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2003 07:56:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt Dioguardi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/51</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/51</guid>
      <description>When speaking here of Darwinism, I shall speak always of today&#39;s theory--that is Darwin&#39;s own theory of natural selection supported by the Mendelian theory of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WSJ.com - More Orwellian Than You Think</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:36:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dio@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/50</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/50</guid>
      <description>*Please note, the sender&#39;s email address has not been verified. You have received the following link from dio@... ******************** If you are having</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(no subject)</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2003 03:18:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matthew Dioguardi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/49</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/49</guid>
      <description>We must first have a theory before we can observe. However, what if the object of my observations are my own observations, my own subjective state? Need I a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Popper on evolution as science</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2003 11:05:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matthew Dioguardi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/48</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudyRoomMD/message/48</guid>
      <description>&quot;The fact that the theory of natural selection is difficult to test has led some people, anti-Darwinists and even some great Darwinists, to claim that it is a</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Tue Dec  1 21:25:29 PST 2009 -->
