Synoptic at Yahoo! Groups

13th Annual E-Lister's Meeting at SBL

Jeffrey B. Gibson — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:43:03 GMT

... I meant I begin to arrange the now traditional (13th annual!) gathering of all those NT and Biblical and Biblically related e-list members (i.e. XTalkers,

13th Annual E-Lister's Meeting at SBL

Jeffrey B. Gibson — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:14:34 GMT

With apologies for cross posting. It's that time of year again when the Society of Biblical Literature's Annual Meeting is just around the corner (Nov. 21st -

Re: New article on Q and method

Ron Price — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:33:56 GMT

... Thanks to Wieland for passing on this information. The argument in the second sentence in the abstract above is probably true (depending on one's

Re: New article on Q and method

Chuck Jones — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:56:01 GMT

Amen, amen, and amen. It must, and it does. Rev. Chuck JonesAtlanta, Georgia ... From: Wieland Willker Subject: [Synoptic-L] New article on

New article on Q and method

Wieland Willker — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:42:56 GMT

"Q as Hypothesis: A Study in Methodology" Francis Watson New Testament Studies (2009), 55:397-415 Abstract Arguments for the Q hypothesis have changed little

Re: Q, Aramaic, and strata of the woes

David Mealand — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:08:24 GMT

Casey's book on Q does indeed offer a number of very valuable insights into the possible development of the tradition prior to its translation into Greek. It

An Aramaic cat among the pigeons

Ron Price — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:47:01 GMT

Maurice Casey liberated a much-needed cat among the synoptic pigeons when he set out detailed evidence that an Aramaic source lay behind the 'Woes' ("An

Re: Red herring or red flag?

Ron Price — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:11:30 GMT

... David, You don't spell out the latter problems. If you refer to Luke's treatment of Matthew's birth and resurrection narratives, then my explanation would

Re: Red herring or red flag?

David Mealand — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:15:20 GMT

Ron's web page does list some of the problems with some of the theories. There are problems esp over minor agreements on the Q view. There are also problems

Re: Red herring or red flag?

Ron Price — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:50:10 GMT

... Graham, I'm sure there is some truth in this. However 'degree of verbal agreement' as a criterion is not as useful as one might think. If there is very

Re: Re herring or red flag? following Lupia

Tony Buglass — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 08:15:24 GMT

Charles Schwarz wrote: He [John Lupia] also says "Since all four Gospels were written by the Catholic Church by the original eyewitnesses by the authority of

Re: Re herring or red flag? following Lupia

fathchuck@... — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:33:51 GMT

I don't know where to begin! First, little or none of Mr.Lupia's post is the official teaching of the Catholic Church and as I understand it not the common

Re: Re herring or red flag?

Graham Budd — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:21:41 GMT

Surely one argument for some sort of Q is that of Bussmann, rehashed entertainingly by Casey: ie that the Q material can be seen to fall into two types: one

Re: Re herring or red flag?

John Lupia — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:21:32 GMT

My dear brother Leonard Matthew does not rest in peace but beholds the glory of Jesus Christ forever. As for Matthew using Mark, huh! Prove it! As far as I am

Luke's use of a sayings source

Ron Price — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:11:36 GMT

Some of my previous arguments for the synoptic use of a sayings source do not necessarily apply to Luke. So I have now extended and clarified the arguments for