<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Synoptic at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/</link>
    <description>Synoptic-L</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Klinghardt and The Case Against Q - some recent thoughts.</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 09:18:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ronald Price</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4862</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4862</guid>
      <description>... David, Perhaps a good place to start would be with the section headed &quot;Occasional Lukan Originality&quot; on the web page below. The section lists 18 places</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Klinghardt and The Case Against Q - some recent thoughts.</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:49:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Inglis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4861</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4861</guid>
      <description>Back in 2008, in a response to &#39;The Case Against Q&#39;, Klinghardt (The Marcionite Gospel and the Synoptic Problem: A New Suggestion) suggested that the problem</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mark 2:9 and and 2 Kings 20:9</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 20:45:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jgibson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4860</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4860</guid>
      <description>Some years ago  I noted that in within Mk. 2:1-12 Mark has cast Jesus&#39; offer to make something happen in such a way as to call to mind the similar offer on the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Evidence that at some point Luke began at v. 1:5b</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 08:20:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ronald Price</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4859</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4859</guid>
      <description>... David, For what it&#39;s worth, neither my page model for LukeEdn1 nor my page model for LukeEdn2 would work without the inclusion of these verses. (For the </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Early evidence for the genealogy in Lk?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 21:14:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Inglis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4858</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4858</guid>
      <description>Can we deduce anything from the absence of patristic references to Lk 3:23-38 (at least, according to http://earlychristianwritings.com/e-catena/luke3.html )?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Evidence that at some point Luke began at v. 1:5b</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 20:29:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Inglis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4857</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4857</guid>
      <description>Thanks Dennis, Jeffrey: In Ad. Haer (c. 180) Irenaeus gives us evidence of Lk 1:2. Origen is obviously later (e.g. Homilies on Luke c. 240 quotes Lk 1:1), so</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Evidence that at some point Luke began at v. 1:5b</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 19:14:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jgibson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4856</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4856</guid>
      <description>... Origien Jeffrey ****** *Origenes* Theol., *Fragmenta in evangelium Joannis *(in catenis) (2042: 006) &quot;/Origenes Werke, /vol. 4&quot;, Ed. Preuschen, E. Leipzig:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Evidence that at some point Luke began at v. 1:5b</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 18:49:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4855</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4855</guid>
      <description>Maybe Irenaeus. http://earlychristianwritings.com/e-catena/luke1.html Dennis Dean Carpenter Dahlonega, Ga. So, perhaps a better question from me would have</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Evidence that at some point Luke began at v. 1:5b</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 18:07:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Inglis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4854</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4854</guid>
      <description>In response to my question: &quot; Luke 1:1-4 is an obvious intro, so is there any other evidence to suggest that at some point Luke did not have these first 4</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: On sifting Source from Sondergut</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 15:43:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Mealand</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4853</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4853</guid>
      <description>The varying figures for words (or verses) to be allocated to different Synoptic categories are not easy to resolve. Poirier (CBR 2008, 101ff) has a good</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Evidence that at some point Luke began at v. 1:5b</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 02:41:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>E Bruce Brooks</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4852</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4852</guid>
      <description>David Inglis asked, a propos quotations of Gospel beginnings in the Patristic literature, that for Luke lacking the prologue: &quot; Luke 1:1-4 is an obvious intro,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Evidence that at some point Luke began at v. 1:5b</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 00:02:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Inglis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4851</guid>
      <description>In Ad. Haer, Book III, Chapter 11, 8 (http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103311.htm ), Irenaeus is quoted as follows: And therefore the Gospels are in accord</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How many verses in the Songerguts, Triple or Double Traditions, </title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 00:14:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Inglis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4850</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4850</guid>
      <description>Rick, verses is just a (somewhat crude) measure of the size of the different ‘sections’ of the synoptics, that I can use to calculate the average number of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How many verses in the Songerguts, Triple or Double Traditions, </title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 22:57:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rick Hubbard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4849</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4849</guid>
      <description>Just curious David, but what is it that &quot;verses&quot; relate to? Clauses (properly identified) seem to have more potential value. Just a thought.... Regards, Rick </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How many verses in the Songerguts, Triple or Double Traditions, </title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 18:10:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Inglis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4848</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Synoptic/message/4848</guid>
      <description>So far, such replies as I have seen (thank you) concentrate on word counts. These will, of course, vary depending on which variants are or are not counted, and</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- rss1.grp.bf1.yahoo.com uncompressed Sat May 18 22:20:51 PDT 2013 -->
