TYPEWRITERS at Yahoo! Groups

FOR SALE: REMINGTON PORTABLE No.1: 329TH MADE!!!!! VERY RARE- NO RIG

Chris Bromfield — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:33:40 GMT

Hi All, I am the proud owner of a very rare black Remington Portable Typewriter [#1] made in October 1921. This suburb condition, early version of the

FOR SALE: REMINGTON PORTABLE No.1: 329TH MADE!!!!! VERY RARE- NO RIG

chris.bromfield — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:26:58 GMT

Hi All, I am the proud owner of a very rare black Remington Portable Typewriter [#1] made in October 1921. This suburb condition, early version of the

FOR SALE: REMINGTON PORTABLE No.1: 329TH MADE!!!!! VERY RARE- NO RIG

Chris Bromfield — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:26:06 GMT

Hi All, I am the proud owner of a very rare black Remington Portable Typewriter [#1] made in October 1921. This suburb condition, early version of the

OLIVETTI, REMEMBERING FOR THE FUTURE

fransu_marin — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:21:18 GMT

Good morning, You can contribute to the initiative for a great Olivetti museum in Ivrea (Italy). More information at www.olivetti-live.org/index_eng.php Best

Re: 1989 Smith Corona Personal Word Processor (PWP 40)

JAY RESPLER — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 04:46:03 GMT

... Not a collectible, it probably goes for $30-$100 as a working machine. I carry supplies and Owner manual for them. -- Jay Respler ADVANCED BUSINESS

Re: Working on a Remington Standard No. 16

Ned Brooks — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 04:07:16 GMT

On the Model 17 (J-prefix serial number) there is a lever with a small handle and adjustment screw at either end of the carriage, where the platen shaft is

Re: Working on a Remington Standard No. 16

James — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:44:30 GMT

Yes, like he said. I should have looked up the Remington Standards on Davis' site before, I just did and yeah the No. 17 is completely different from my No.

Re: Working on a Remington Standard No. 16

ssuthe7880@... — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:00:13 GMT

In a message dated 7/8/2009 3:00:25 PM Eastern Daylight Time, nedbrooks@... writes: << help James with the Remington 16? How different was the 17 >>

Re: Working on a Remington Standard No. 16

James — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:10:06 GMT

Well it is all good information and helpful, but I don't think mine is as "friendly" platen removal as the No. 17. However looking at it, it does not look like

Re: Working on a Remington Standard No. 16

Ned Brooks — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:59:54 GMT

So does all this help James with the Remington 16? How different was the 17 from the 17?

Re: Noiseless brand question

Steve L. — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:06:53 GMT

I don't know the answer to that question, but if there were two factories, one thing to remember is that Remington and Underwood were competitors, and

Re: Noiseless brand question

David Sadowski — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:19:37 GMT

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Richard Milton wrote: I believe that Underwood manufactured the Noiseless Portable under licence ...

Re: Remington 17 (was: Working on a Remington Standard No. 16)

W.A. Seaver — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:22:15 GMT

I've also seen the name written as "No. 17", "Model 17", "Model Seventeen", and just plain "Seventeen". I've also seen some with no model designation

Re: Working on a Remington Standard No. 16

ssuthe7880@... — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:49:25 GMT

In a message dated 7/8/2009 12:50:09 AM Eastern Daylight Time, nedbrooks@... writes: << they must have lost their model numbers. >> The model number

1989 Smith Corona Personal Word Processor (PWP 40)

bdavis076 — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:28:30 GMT

I have acquired a 1989 Smith Corona Personal Word Processor (PWP 40). It is fully functional, in near mint condition, and includes all parts including a ribbon