<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>TaxoCoP at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/</link>
    <description>Taxonomy Community of Practice</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Faceted Navigation - Number of facets</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:55:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3144</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3144</guid>
      <description>... Renato, I would like you to reconsider the scope of your question. As practitioners, we have found that classification structures vary depending on the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Faceted Navigation - Number of facets</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:41:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John OGorman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3143</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3143</guid>
      <description>... Hello again, Renato I recently joined this group for a couple of reasons: One is to find out where the taxonomy community is headed. Two is to find out</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>KM/IC Journal Ranking</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:32:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dr. Nick Bontis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3142</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3142</guid>
      <description>Dear KM/IC Colleague: I hope all is well. I thought that you would be interested in this recent paper on journal rankings within the field of knowledge</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Faceted Navigation - Number of facets</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stephanie Lemieux</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3141</guid>
      <description>Hi Renato, Patrick was right with his answer of &quot;it depends&quot; (a typical consultant answer that I swear by)... But of course you&#39;re looking for more :) I wrote</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Faceted Navigation - Number of facets</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:23:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John OGorman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3140</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3140</guid>
      <description>... Hi Renato - I&#39;m sorry, I meant no offense - really, I shouldn&#39;t post late in the day. 19 is the number of dimensions in my framework and it seems to me</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Faceted Navigation - Number of facets</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:47:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>renatoalves_nce</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3139</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3139</guid>
      <description>... Hi John, Yes, I agree it looked like a naive way to address this issue, but what I was trying to ask is: are there any general guidelines or good practices</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Distance grad courses in XML?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:23:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>marcy_brown</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3138</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3138</guid>
      <description>Good morning, I&#39;m looking for a graduate-level introductory course in XML to take as an elective for my M.A. program. I&#39;ve found a few courses, but nothing</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Faceted Navigation - Number of facets</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:53:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Lambe</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3137</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3137</guid>
      <description>The answer is it depends on what you want to use the facets for, and how simple/predictable they are. If you want to use facets for navigation, users typically</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Faceted Navigation - Number of facets</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:33:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John OGorman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3136</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3136</guid>
      <description>... Hi Renato The answer is 19. Hope this helps. :~) John O&#39;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Faceted Navigation - Number of facets</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:02:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Renato Alves</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3135</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3135</guid>
      <description>Hello, I&#39;m a master course student of UFRJ University, here in Brazil. I&#39;ve been lurking here for a few days, and this is the first time I ask a question for </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Orphan terms in thesauruses</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:45:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Lambe</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3134</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3134</guid>
      <description>Gabriel My book &#39;Organising Knowledge&#39; has an extensive discussion of facets and facet analysis with examples and further references. Facet analysis is a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Earley Presentation at SemTech 2009...</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:38:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>aredmondneal</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3133</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3133</guid>
      <description>Much of the linking between these two camps is already done and implemented but there is plenty of room for comment.  A well formed thesaurus will parse as an</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Earley Presentation at SemTech 2009...</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:14:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Keipat Patkei</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3132</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3132</guid>
      <description>Matt, I&#39;m with Christine. Well put.  That&#39;s what I was keen to at SemTech, though I hadn&#39;t come up with three groupings. I think that third one may have put</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Earley Presentation at SemTech 2009...</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:05:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Keipat Patkei</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3131</guid>
      <description>Thanks, John, I fully agree.  Thanks for making some excellent points, in particular, &quot;but our experience and database / object oriented blinders prevents us</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Earley Presentation at SemTech 2009...</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:59:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Christine Connors</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3130</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TaxoCoP/message/3130</guid>
      <description>I couldn&#39;t agree more - very nicely summed up! The hybrid approach is still best. Christine I think there are actually 3 groups out there in</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Jul  5 15:21:23 PDT 2009 -->
