<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>TestFirstUserInterfaces at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/</link>
    <description>TestFirstUserInterfaces</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: XP and image processing</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 03:30:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Phlip</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1012</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1012</guid>
      <description>[CCd to testfirstuserinterfaces@yahoogroups.com ] ... Study the source to Cairo (part of Gtk+). It uses a system called &quot;golden master test&quot;. Each test case</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What to automate - simple tests or complex tests</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:09:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rob Park</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1011</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1011</guid>
      <description>I think neither, but perhaps focus on problem forms (?) first. Actually, I would focus on new stories first, then problem forms second. I would work new</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What to automate - simple tests or complex tests</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 05:37:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stephan Meyn</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1010</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1010</guid>
      <description>Just a question to the group - if you are looking to start automating testing, you may not have the opportunity to invest in automating all you would like to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [agile-testing] Recommended Training</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 20:17:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Phlip</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1009</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1009</guid>
      <description>... Do your developers run the tests after every 1 to 10 edits, with the highest odds on 1? Do your developers prefer to revert when a test fails unexpectedly</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [agile-testing] .Net WinForm GUI testing</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:22:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Phlip</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1008</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1008</guid>
      <description>... Can you treat the forms as objects, and just access their properties from normal unit tests? -- Phlip</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>snippet - assert_stdout</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:07:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Phlip</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1007</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1007</guid>
      <description>TFUIers: Ideally, when your developer tests call production code, it should not spew output to your STDOUT stream. If it must emit strings, it should return</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [agile-testing] is Selenium the best choice</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:36:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>George Dinwiddie</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1006</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1006</guid>
      <description>... Mark, that&#39;s something I hadn&#39;t thought about as I&#39;ve never used the record/playback form of testing with Abbot.  I used it for TDDing the GUI, so the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GWT and Fit (Was: Test-driving ASP.NET)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:30:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ketan kalia</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1005</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1005</guid>
      <description>Hi, Please try WebAii from www.artoftest.com I have used it and it is really good.It can be run inside the NUnit framework,supports AJAX testing. And it can be</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GWT and Fit (Was: Test-driving ASP.NET)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:38:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Daniel Wellman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1004</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1004</guid>
      <description>GWT code looks like regular Java code except in a few conditions: it can inline native JavaScript within your Java source, or it can use a compile-time</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GWT and Fit (Was: Test-driving ASP.NET)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 08:50:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rick Mugridge</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1003</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1003</guid>
      <description>Hi Dan, No, I haven&#39;t, but I&#39;ve been keen to try out GWT for some time. I really like the way they manage Javascript. I&#39;ve been waiting for the widget set to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GWT and Fit (Was: Test-driving ASP.NET)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 04:20:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Daniel Wellman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1002</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1002</guid>
      <description>Hi Rick, Have you written Fit tests for GWT?  If so, did your tests require one of the fake hosted mode browsers to run to handle widgets or deferred binding? </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Test-driving ASP.NET</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:55:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rob Park</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1001</guid>
      <description>Thanks! .rob. ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Test-driving ASP.NET</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:53:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rick Mugridge</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1000</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/1000</guid>
      <description>Hi Rob, ... Yes, UI tests are very slow, whether it&#39;s web-based or GUI. That&#39;s one of the big problems with them. Sometimes you&#39;re forced to decide on timeout</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Test-driving ASP.NET</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:38:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rob Park</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/999</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/999</guid>
      <description>On the agile-testing list, I&#39;ve been gathering info WRT acceptance tests for this and comparing WatiR, WatiN, Selenium, etc... So now I&#39;ve noticed that our</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[ANN] assert_hpricot</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Phlip</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/998</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces/message/998</guid>
      <description>Agilitas: Here&#39;s a blog entry on how to use Why&#39;s Hpricot library inside assertions, to constrain your Rails views: </description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.scd.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Jul  6 18:12:07 PDT 2008 -->
