TheRogakReport at Yahoo! Groups

Re: The Rogak Report: 04 Jan 2010 ** No Fault - Affidavits of Adjust

Jeena Belil — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:16:33 GMT

Lawrence, The scenario you described at the bottom of your email sounds like hearsay and perhaps no objection was made, or not formulated correctly (?) or the

The Rogak Report: 05 Jan 2010: No Fault - 30 Day Rule

Lawrence — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:08:50 GMT

ONCE AGAIN, INSURER IS CRITICIZED FOR CLAIMS PRACTICES: IT "BORDERS ON IMPROPRIETY" TO SELECTIVELY CITE OLD, OBSOLETE ARB DECISIONS In the Matter of the

Peer reviews

Sherri — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:48:25 GMT

what are your thoughts with prevailing on peer reviews for medical bills and if and when they should be done? Thanks [That's a big subject, too much to cover

Re: No-Fault denials concerning IME no shows

Sherri — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:14:44 GMT

I just need some clarity as I read through the case you suggested. Am I reading correctly that case precedent is that you can deny ALL no-fault benefits

Re: The Rogak Report: 21 Dec 2009 No Fault - Pre-Claim IMEs

Sherri — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:04:12 GMT

so you are saying that with two no shows you can deny from the date of the first no-show ALL No-Fault benefits for any specialty, is that correct? Thank you

No-Fault denials concerning IME no shows

Sherri — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:49:04 GMT

Is there case law that states you are able to deny further treatment based on claimant's failure to show for an IME exam from the date of the first exam, and

The Rogak Report: 04 Jan 2010 ** No Fault - Affidavits of Adjusters

Lawrence — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:48:55 GMT

AFFIDAVIT FROM ADJUSTER WHO BEGAN WORKING AFTER DENIAL WAS MAILED, CANNOT ESTABLISH MAILING Points of Health Acupuncture, P.C. a/a/o Elizabeth Caraballo v

Fraud Given Short Shrift By Congress in Health Bill

Barry Zalma — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:47:46 GMT

Barry Zalma 4441 Sepulveda Boulevard CULVER CITY CA 90230 310-390-4455 zalma@... www.zalma.com Fraud

The Rogak Report: 31 Dec 2009 ** No Fault - Mistakes On Claim Form *

Lawrence — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:16:31 GMT

WHEN NAME OF PROVIDER ON CLAIM FORM DIFFERS FROM NAME OF PLAINTIFF IN SUIT, SUIT GETS DISMISSED Bedford Park Neurology, P.C. a/a/o Mario Vasconcellos v New

The Rogak Report: 29 Dec 2009 ** No Fault - Explanation of Benefits

Lawrence — Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:45:25 GMT

EXPLANATION OF BENEFITS FORM IS NOT A VALID SUBSTITUTE FOR AN NF-10 Question: Can a no-fault bill be validly denied, in whole or in part, by issuing an

The Rogak Report: 29 Dec 2009: ** No Fault - Standing - Partial Paym

Lawrence — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:48:58 GMT

POOR CLAIMS HANDLING RESULTS IN NO-FAULT AWARD FOR MEDICAL BILLS THAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY DEFENDED In the Matter of the Arbitration between [Unnamed

Best Holiday Wishes from Lawrence N. Rogak LLC

Lawrence — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:52:25 GMT

Wishing everyone a safe and happy holiday season. Our office is open this week through 5 PM on Thursday 31 December. And of course, I respond to emails at

The Rogak Report: 23 Dec 2009 (Part 4) ** No Fault - Peer Review Rep

Lawrence — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:36:45 GMT

STAMPED SIGNATURE ON PEER REVIEW RENDERS IT INVALID, EVEN IF ORIGINAL IS PRODUCED AT ARBITRATION In the Matter of the Arbitration between New York Spine

The Rogak Report: 23 Dec 2009 (Part 2) ** No Fault - Prima Facie Cas

Lawrence — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:53:06 GMT

INDEPENDENT BILLING COMPANY CAN'T GET PROVIDER'S BILLS INTO EVIDENCE AT TRIAL Andrew Carothers, M.D., P.C. a/a/o Kesna Grandpierre et al. v GEICO Indem. Co.

The Rogak Report: 23 Dec 2009 (Part 3) ** No Fault - Covered Acciden

Lawrence — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:52:33 GMT

DRIVER'S UNREBUTTED AFFIDAVIT THAT SHE DID NOT STRIKE PEDESTRIAN ENTITLES INSURER TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT Andromeda Med. Care, P.C. a/a/o John Southern v NY Cent.