<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>TheoryOfEverything at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/</link>
    <description>TheoryOfEverything</description>

    <item>
      <title>Sir Newton made a Procrustean bed for classical mechanic</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:07:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alex Belov</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29709</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29709</guid>
      <description>Sir Newton made a Procrustean bed for classical mechanic. How? First law. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton&#39;s_laws_of_motion First Law: &quot;An object in motion</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reflex. 3 6 7 8 11 14 &amp; 0</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:53:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>os_jbug</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29708</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29708</guid>
      <description>I also see now that there are four sets   ---0, 3, 4 and 14---   that have a diagonal row of four primes. The turning point numbers for the symmetrically</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>one - two - three - general relativity</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 18:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Zeus</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29707</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29707</guid>
      <description>What you MUST know about general relativity:   http://www.amperefitz.com/123rel.htm    enjoy   fitz     What you MUST know about general relativity: </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FREE Animations you can e-mail</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:17:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Zeus</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29706</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29706</guid>
      <description>FREE Animations you can e-mail   (click link):   http://www.amperefitz.com/contact.html   THOUSANDS of FREE Animations   Enjoy,   Fitz         FREE</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reflexive Rotation 0-14</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:55:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>os_jbug</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29705</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29705</guid>
      <description>Below we have15 numbers rotated/spun 15 times. Arthur Youngs Reflexive Arc is based upon the 7 color mapping of the surface of a torus using only seven numbers</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More from Juli</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:13:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tony Bermanseder</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29704</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29704</guid>
      <description>My dear Abraxas, If humans depend on the vibratory rate of the collective and the vast majority still feels ?trapped? within it, what would be the best way</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [InfoPhysics] R.T. Cahill&#39;s Quantum Foam theory</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:03:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jim Whitescarver</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29703</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29703</guid>
      <description>The importance of quantum foam theory is it is another example of an inflow model that is consistent with general relativity.  This mean gravity is consistent</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Throwing a bit more light on Quantum Foam theory</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:40:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Zeus</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29702</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29702</guid>
      <description>  Throwing a bit more light on   R.T. Cahill&#39;s Quantum Foam theory   http://www.amperefitz.com/cahill.htm   Enjoy   Fitz Throwing a bit more light on R.T.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FW: [TheoryOfEverything] The scheme of Universe.</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:06:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>George Baaden</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29701</guid>
      <description>Supposedly at CERN, they are doing Time Travel!!! George To: TheoryOfEverything@yahoogroups.com From: israsad@... Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 05:49:05 &#43;0000 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Prespacetime</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:43:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>HuH</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29700</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29700</guid>
      <description>Dear Fellow Forum Members: For forum members interested prespacetime physics, Prespacetime Journal (&quot;PSTJ&quot; a physics journal) is formally launched at</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Could someone repeat this experiment?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:49:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Laurent DAMOIS</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29699</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29699</guid>
      <description>in our modern classical mechanics, violation of momentum conservation, is accepted, when we have transformation: translation to rotation or rotation to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Could someone repeat this experiment?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:19:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>abelov0927</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29698</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29698</guid>
      <description>Thank you for you post. However, the modern classical mechanics still disapprove that. Base on law of momentum conservation value of these pencils translation</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Could someone repeat this experiment?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 14:20:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Laurent DAMOIS</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29697</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29697</guid>
      <description>You are right, rotating pencil goes slowly than non rotating pencil, this fact is demonstrated by experiments with falling rotating disk, or with </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The difference and its unity.</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:21:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>socratus</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29696</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29696</guid>
      <description>The difference and its unity. Socratus. The Universe as whole is: T=0K. Modern Physicists. You are wrong. Now (!) the Universe as whole is: T=2,7K ( Nobel</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reflexive Numerics( 0-14 )</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:00:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>os_jbug</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29695</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/29695</guid>
      <description>So many asymmetries and symmetries with just 14 numbers.  How did things get so out of whack.  Well beyond the number having a simple holding of position, in</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Mar 28 11:20:26 PDT 2010 -->
