<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>UnsolvedProblems at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/</link>
    <description>Unsolved Problems in Number Theory,</description>

    <item>
      <title>Proposed solution to the Voynich Manuscript</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:07:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>zzgorme</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/96</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/96</guid>
      <description>http://www.edithsherwood.com/voynich_decoded/index.php</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Goldbach</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:26:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>zetacooking</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/95</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/95</guid>
      <description>What connection? I have settled (but not published) the RH and have briefly considered the GC but put it aside as an unrelated problem. As I understand it, GC</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Goldbach</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:10:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>zzgorme</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/94</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/94</guid>
      <description>... Doesn&#39;t a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis also prove the Goldbach Conjecture? I was able to prove a connection between the two though this has been known</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Goldbach</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:37:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tim Roberts</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/93</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/93</guid>
      <description>I can&#39;t make any sense of this.  Could you give an example?  How do you show that, say, the number 441993252 is the sum of two primes? Tim </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Goldbach</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:24:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ito.buda</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/92</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/92</guid>
      <description>... The proof can be made with some logical reasoning. 1. the program reverse 3 find allways all composites of N. 2. the composites can be divided by divisors</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ramsey Number formula</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:55:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>leavemsg1</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/91</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/91</guid>
      <description>look... below afterward... I did two solutions by hand without using a drawing, I know the choices to make for partitions. I&#39;m surprised to see that Ramsey</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ramsey Number formula</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>leavemsg1</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/90</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/90</guid>
      <description>I&#39;m surprised to see that Ramsey Numbers are so similar to the search for prime numbers. If you&#39;re not familar with the theory then go to google, type in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goldbach</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tim Roberts</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/89</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/89</guid>
      <description>I&#39;d like to present my own view on the Goldbach Conjecture.  I believe this is one of those conjectures that is true, but will never be proved.  Why?  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mathproject10</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:17:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ito.buda</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/88</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/88</guid>
      <description>14 notebooks free download on number theory at: http://www.simtel.net/free/Math-related-Programs/mathproject10/398496.html Ito Buda Description The first 6</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: (unknown)</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:04:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tim Roberts</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/87</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/87</guid>
      <description>Sure - my mortgage.  :-) Or more generally, anything which varies according to N(new) = kN(old). Such processes are incredibly common.  Tim </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(no subject)</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:01:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>sergey_beliy</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/86</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/86</guid>
      <description>can you give an example of something changing proportional to itself ?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IE 8</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 10:07:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>tsr21</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/85</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/85</guid>
      <description>If you are silly enough (like me) to have downloaded Internet Explorer 8, you may have had some problems viewing various web sites, including the Unsolved</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>update to web site</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:39:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>tsr21</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/84</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/84</guid>
      <description>The Beal Conjecture and Fermat&#39;s Last Theorem have been added to the web site, at http://www.unsolvedproblems.org/.  Although FLT was proved in 1994 by Andrew</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Set of prime numbers and the sum of prime numbers</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:03:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>murat.cagliyan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/83</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/83</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ve define a set of prime numbers. hypothesis and the Goldbach&#39;s conjecture of Riemann that I think would work. a certain number of N, so that, the sum of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The sum of prime numbers</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:03:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>murat.cagliyan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/82</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/UnsolvedProblems/message/82</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ve define a set of prime numbers. hypothesis and the Goldbach&#39;s conjecture of Riemann that I think would work. a certain number of N, so that, the sum of</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Mar 28 20:45:52 PDT 2010 -->
