<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Voice4all at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/</link>
    <description>Proportional voting in the USA</description>

    <item>
      <title>IRV being considered for LA November Ballot - TODAY @ City Council, </title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:27:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>flwr42</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/707</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/707</guid>
      <description>[As a moderated list, and with the moderators having lives and not always able to moderate in a timely fashion, sometimes messages get delayed past their</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nader on Stewart&#39;s Daily Show tonight</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:06:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Cathy Gilbert</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/706</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/706</guid>
      <description>HI all, Nader will be on Jon Stewart&#39;s show tonight. (I know I embarrassingly carped about the Daily and Colbert shows at one point for having too much right</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Local Government Elections in Scotland and England</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:39:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James Gilmour</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/705</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/705</guid>
      <description>The Electoral Reform Society has today published two important reports. SCOTLAND ========= Putting the People in Control </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: disillusioned</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:39:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Chris Jerdonek</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/704</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/704</guid>
      <description>... I would not say this is true.  Even the surveys conducted by San Francisco State after the very first election showed that voters favored and understood</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: disillusioned</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 03:23:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bob Richard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/703</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/703</guid>
      <description>One more thought, in addition to Steve&#39;s excellent suggestions:  hook up with others who are working on electoral reform, nationally through these lists (both</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: disillusioned</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 03:19:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rob Richie</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/702</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/702</guid>
      <description>We actually had a terrific 2006 -- some real headway, with some ballot measure wins that were very impressive, in big jurisdictions that were politically</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: disillusioned</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 03:07:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>steve.chessin@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/701</guid>
      <description>Please don&#39;t be discouraged.  This kind of change takes a long time. And it&#39;s easier to make changes at the local level than at the state level, but once</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>disillusioned</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 02:43:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>pangaious1</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/700</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/700</guid>
      <description>My friends, no one is more pro IRV and PP than me.  But I&#39;m disilussioned as I see the years pass and nothing is accomplished at the state levels and let alone</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rules to implement WIGM STV with manual counting</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:37:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James Gilmour</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/699</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/699</guid>
      <description>The Weighted Inclusive Gregory Method (WIGM) of transferring consequential surpluses is under active consideration for public STV elections in Scotland and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: latimes on the california citizens assembly</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:23:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul Klinkman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/698</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/698</guid>
      <description>... Rhode Island is almost progressive enough for a try.  However, RI is a one party state.  The Democrats have held 99% of the real power for everyone&#39;s</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [proportionalvoting] Re: [Voice4all] latimes on the california </title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 21:47:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>steve.chessin@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/697</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/697</guid>
      <description>... They did.  This is from the online corrections page at http://www.latimes.com/news/custom/corrections/ Voting method -- An article in the Dec. 26</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [proportionalvoting] Re: [Voice4all] latimes on the california </title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:47:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>steve.chessin@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/696</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/696</guid>
      <description>I sent the below to the LA Times a few days ago, and got an email and a follow-up call from the Readers Representative department.  I gather that they&#39;ll run a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: latimes on the california citizens assembly</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:50:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Terrill Bouricius</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/695</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/695</guid>
      <description>Vermont is a potential spot for pushing a citizens&#39; assembly...However, there is not an immediate widely felt &quot;problem&quot; to solve (unlike the result of the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [proportionalvoting] latimes on the california citizens assembly</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:04:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Chris Jerdonek</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/694</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/694</guid>
      <description>Here&#39;s the blog about Citizens Assemblies mentioned in the LA Times article: http://jhsnider.net/citizensassembly.htm</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [proportionalvoting] latimes on the california citizens assembly</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:31:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bob Richard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/693</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Voice4all/message/693</guid>
      <description>David and all, True, the L.A. Times article doesn&#39;t elaborate on proportional voting. But this is great coverage for us anyway. (1) It describes an opt-out</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Dec  2 05:57:05 PST 2009 -->
