<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>abcusers at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/</link>
    <description>abcusers</description>

    <item>
      <title>abcm2ps-5.9.6 docs in HTML format</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:56:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Hudson Flávio Meneses Lacerda</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2244</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2244</guid>
      <description>Here is a conversion of abcm2ps-5.9.6 doc files to HTML format: http://hudsonlacerda.webs.com/abc/abcm2ps-5.9.6-html-en.tgz (There is an index at the bottom of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which of these is more intuitive?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:42:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Susan Dittmar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2243</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2243</guid>
      <description>... I can&#39;t tell. But there&#39;s a problem with just changing suffixes when using Windows: by default, Windows does not show suffixes of files, and uses those</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which of these is more intuitive?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:15:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gary Lawrence Murphy</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2242</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2242</guid>
      <description>there is also a new emerging (and actively supported) text-mode emacs web browser -- this is important stuff to blind people as the emacs-based emacspeak</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which of these is more intuitive?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:54:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Hudson Flávio Meneses Lacerda</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2241</guid>
      <description>Once he said me (by e-mail) that the process of sending a message to fetch the page may take two days to access a page... BTW, w3m runs inside Emacs. It is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which of these is more intuitive?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:10:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Richard Walker</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2240</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2240</guid>
      <description>There are DOS utility programs that work  with batch files to do almost anything you want with Windows.  A couple people even  created a set of utilities that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which of these is more intuitive?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:47:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Calum Galleitch</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2239</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2239</guid>
      <description>... That would be entirely too straightforward... http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.misc/134979</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which of these is more intuitive?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:52:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dglenn@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2238</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2238</guid>
      <description>... *nod*  Third thing I did (second was to make unrecognized options result in a &quot;usage&quot; message), _and_ after 23 years of procrastination I&#39;ve even started</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which of these is more intuitive?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:08:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Richard Walker</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2237</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2237</guid>
      <description>Please include either a -h, -?, /h or /? to bring up a help file to explain what options are available.  They are usually worth  their weight in gold.  I like</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which of these is more intuitive?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:58:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dglenn@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2236</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2236</guid>
      <description>... Again, less of a PITA for me to code ... but how friendly is this to Windows users when it gets ported?  (I&#39;m thinking more about the &quot;principle of least</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which of these is more intuitive?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:53:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dglenn@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2235</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2235</guid>
      <description>... Easier for me, too ... how friendly is that to Windows users? (I don&#39;t have a native Windows C compiler, but I do plan to compile under Cygwin at least --</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which of these is more intuitive?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:49:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dglenn@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2234</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2234</guid>
      <description>... Ah, but that already is the default case, and was the first case coded.  I&#39;m up to adding a &quot;-r for &#39;replace&#39;&quot; option, for batch processing of lots of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which of these is more intuitive?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:36:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gary Lawrence Murphy</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2233</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2233</guid>
      <description>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecasound looks perfect.  thanks again!</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which of these is more intuitive?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:34:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gary Lawrence Murphy</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2232</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2232</guid>
      <description>thanks -- I know sox of course, but ecasound might be what I need, I&#39;ll check it out.  What I want ideally is a simple command line way to invoke any of those</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which of these is more intuitive?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:00:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2231</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2231</guid>
      <description>quasi-related to this and almost completely off-topic for abc but I&#39;m asking ... What sort of transforms?  I do almost all my audio file manipulations via</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which of these is more intuitive?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:46:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Susan Dittmar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2230</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/message/2230</guid>
      <description>... Well, there are enough unix tools using .bak -- but they usually do not *replace* the original extension (the concept of file name extensions is rather</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Tue Dec  1 07:22:42 PST 2009 -->
