http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/ ace-bugs Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:55:49 GMT Johnny Willemsen http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5915 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5915 Hi, ... Doesn't this give issues with older gcc version? See also http://bugzilla.dre.vanderbilt.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=3270 Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:28:58 GMT Iliyan Jeliazkov http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5914 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5914 Hi Chad, Thanks for taking the initiative to tackle this one! ... Yes. ... Yes. The code for the module implementation (in a DLL) gets unloaded as soon as the Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:11:41 GMT Aaron Scamehorn http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5913 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5913 Hi JT, I don't think so either, but it sure seems like they're wrong! I found an interesting blog about this at http://xania.org/200711/ambiguous-overloading. Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:51:33 GMT J.T. Conklin http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5912 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5912 ... I don't think so. However, I do know my original hypothesis is wrong. I did a search for gcc's "... are ambiguous even though the worst conversion for the Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:39:58 GMT Chad Beaulac http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5911 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5911 Hi Doug and Iliyan Here's what I got so far on this issue. 1) The following are registered in the ACE_Service_Repository: 1.1) Service Objects as Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:28:47 GMT Aaron Scamehorn http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5910 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5910 ... It sure seems like the compiler(s) is(are) wrong. In my case, JT, ACE_UINT64 typedef'd as an unsigned long long (sizeof=8). That's not the same thing as a Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:23:46 GMT Steve Huston http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5909 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5909 Hi J.T., ... Right, but this would be: void msec(unsigned long& ms) const; ... I would think that "long" and "unsigned long" would be different enough. Also, Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:03:10 GMT J.T. Conklin http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5908 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5908 ... Currently there are three methods to convert to/from milliseconds to ACE_Time_Value. unsigned long msec (void) const; void msec (ACE_UINT64 &ms) const; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:52:50 GMT J.T. Conklin http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5907 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5907 ... I think the compiler is right. For the case where ACE_UINT64 is defined in terms of long, ACE_Time_Value essentially has both: void msec(long& ms) const; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:33:09 GMT Steve Huston http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5906 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5906 Ok, thanks Yauheni - I added this information to the bug report. -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation Want to take ACE training on YOUR schedule? See Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:21:29 GMT Yauheni Akhotnikau http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5905 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5905 Hi, I have the same results for Aaron small test program (with MY_UINT64) with VC++ 7.1 and VC++ 8.0: t.cpp t.cpp(18) : error C2666: 'A::msec' : 2 overloads Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:10:14 GMT Steve Huston http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5904 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5904 Hi Aaron, Good to hear from you! Thanks for the PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM. I reproduced this on RHEL 4, same compiler. Since this was not detected by the current ACE Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:21:56 GMT Aaron Scamehorn http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5903 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5903 Hi All- Thanks for your help, Aaron To: ace-bugs@... Subject: void ACE_Time_Value::msec(ACE_UINT64&) const ACE VERSION: 5.6.5 HOST MACHINE and Fri, 30 May 2008 08:23:02 GMT Hofmann, Christoph http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5902 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5902 ACE VERSION: 5.6.4 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: P4 with Suse Linux 10.2 TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: COMPILER NAME AND Thu, 29 May 2008 11:53:33 GMT Steve Huston http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5901 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/5901 Hi Saurabh, Thank you for the PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM. ... There's a variable in the MPC template for VC8, TreatWChar_tAsBuiltInType. If you set that to false, the