http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/ ADIF Developers Thu, 16 May 2013 05:47:58 GMT grahamg3zod http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5507 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5507 Jim, I am adding these to the next list of proposals BUT I have taken the liberty of reversing the subtones/bandwidth because DM780/fldigi/MultiPSK all list Wed, 15 May 2013 16:52:24 GMT grahamg3zod http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5506 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5506 While I'm at it, also: III. C. Minimum Fields The ADIF specification does not specify what fields must be included in a record nor does a record necessarily Wed, 15 May 2013 14:03:41 GMT grahamg3zod http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5505 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5505 I will include the revised definitions in the next proposal list. Also, taking up Dave's point, I propose a "Implementation Notes" section for the external Tue, 14 May 2013 20:40:27 GMT Dave AA6YQ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5504 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5504 The whole point of the SUBMODE proposal is to make it easy to add submodes. If there’s no opposition to adding Jim VA3HJ’s proposed submodes, then we can Tue, 14 May 2013 15:10:12 GMT Graham Smith http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5503 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5503 Hi Jim. As the existing proposal has been put up for a poll to determine whether it is included in final ADIF 3.0.4 proposed spec., it wouldn't be appropriate Tue, 14 May 2013 14:37:06 GMT Jim Orcheson http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5502 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5502 Hi Graham. I am not sure from you message below whether you intend to add the few common Olivia modes to the submodes list or not. I never did expect all 40 Tue, 14 May 2013 14:22:56 GMT Jim Orcheson http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5501 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5501 The modes and submodes debate has been going on since the first days of ADIF 2 because it was included in a list of suggested enhancements for ADIF 1. Many of Tue, 14 May 2013 13:32:04 GMT grahamg3zod http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5500 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5500 Hi Jim. I only saw your post after I created the poll, otherwise I would have deferred it while this topic is discussed. The 3.0.4 MFSK, PSK and OLIVIA names Tue, 14 May 2013 12:54:45 GMT http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5499 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5499 Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the adifdev group: Should "[1] Introduction of SUBMODE field and deprecation of sub-modes from Mode Tue, 14 May 2013 12:52:12 GMT Jim Orcheson http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5498 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5498 The various PSK submodes (PSK31, PSK63, PSK125) differ in speed and bandwidth. The various MFSK submodes (MFSK8, MFSK16, etc.) differ by the number if subtones Sun, 12 May 2013 10:22:29 GMT grahamg3zod http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5497 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5497 I was just thinking that a 3rd option is to "escape" commas that are not separators, in the style of C-related languages: MA\,Middlesex This has a very big Sun, 12 May 2013 09:54:38 GMT grahamg3zod http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5496 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5496 I have been wondering this as well; I accept Mike's "geographical" example, but if there is no pressure from users for the ability to record it, then it's Sun, 12 May 2013 08:25:05 GMT http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5495 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5495 The following adifdev poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: Should "[4] Awards and Credit changes" be included in the ADIF 3.0.4 Sun, 12 May 2013 08:25:05 GMT http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5494 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5494 The following adifdev poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: Should "[7] 630m in Band enumeration" be included in the ADIF 3.0.4 Sun, 12 May 2013 04:19:03 GMT Dave AA6YQ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5493 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adifdev/message/5493 From my perspective, ADIF 3.0.4 should provide a means of conveying multiple grid squares and counties to support the needs of the VUCC and USA-CA award