advaitin at Yahoo! Groups

Re: drushti and satya

Bhaskar YR — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:20:47 GMT

In the statement `satyAnRite mithunIkRitya' in adhyAsabhAShya, are the satya and anRita of the same level of reality or different levels? Does this not refer

Re: A Perspective - 21

Bhaskar YR — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:04:11 GMT

We are addressing some of the questions raised in the course of these presentations. One is by Shree Bhaskar in terms of sanyaasa. praNAms Sri Sadananda

Re: drushti and satya

snsastri — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:36:27 GMT

Dear Bhaskar-ji, In the statement `satyAnRite mithunIkRitya' in adhyAsabhAShya, are the satya and anRita of the same level of reality or different levels? Does

Re: real and unreal

Bhaskar YR — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:51:21 GMT

just as gold is the cause and ring, bangle, necklace, and even the lump are names and forms. Gold is just Au - with some atomic number. Now tell me what form

Re: drushti and satya

Bhaskar YR — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:59:47 GMT

While commenting on the mantra ''satyam cha anRtam cha Satyam abhavat' (Taittiriya Up. II.6) Sri Shankaracharya says: satyam = vyavaharavishayam praNAms Sri

Re: drushti and satya

subrahmanian_v — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:58:45 GMT

... Namaste. Here is a small note based on the Acharya's Bhashyam on the Taittiriya Upanishad: The Three states/types of Reality (sattaa-traividhyam) While

Re: real and unreal

Br. Pranipata Chaitanya — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:17:21 GMT

... The trouble with the Subbu/Sada-ji interpretation is that it makes the clay itself to be nominal and insubstantial which is a paradoxical result. ...

Re: real and unreal

carlosartista2000 — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:18:59 GMT

In advaitin@yahoogroups.com, "subrahmanian_v" ... felt that it has not been touched upon in the past. It could be that I am unaware of any

Re: real and unreal

subrahmanian_v — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:47:23 GMT

... Namaste Michael ji, I think the above views do not find approval even by Shankara. Just the other day I was reading the Brahmasutra bhashya and found

A Perspective - 21

kuntimaddi sadananda — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:46:35 GMT

Sarva karma sanyaasa: We are addressing some of the questions raised in the course of these presentations. One is by Shree Bhaskar in terms of sanyaasa.

drushti and satya

Bhaskar YR — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:25:17 GMT

praNAms Hare Krishna Can words 'drushti' & 'satya' carry the same meaning?? I dont think so...But surprisingly, while discussing advaita vedAnta, we are

real and unreal

ombhurbhuva — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:02:59 GMT

Namaste Advaitins, I may be thought captious but there are a couple of points not dealt with by Subbu/Sadda-ji. The implication of "non-existence in isolation

Re: Real or unreal

Bhaskar YR — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:07:03 GMT

The shloka means that what is mithyA has no existence (bhAva) at any time. This is what the second definition of mithyAtva quoted by Sada-ji also says-

Real or unreal

snsastri — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:46:46 GMT

Namaste. Subbu-ji and Sada-ji have dealt with the matter thoroughly. I wish to add a few remarks. There is only one reality according to advaita. Brahman is

Re: real and unreal

Bhaskar YR — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:36:31 GMT

praNAms Hare Krishna I am failed to find out the difference of opinion between Sri Subbu prabhuji & Sri Michael prabhuji here. IMO, both are of the same