<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ai-philosophy at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/</link>
    <description>Philosophical Foundations of AI</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Brains and Minds (Edelman continued . . .)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:27:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16812</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16812</guid>
      <description>... Is an expert in ornithology, an expert in aerodynamics? George</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Brains and Minds (Edelman continued . . .)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:59:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter Brawley</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16811</guid>
      <description>... No, Eray, that&#39;s /your/ question, not everybody&#39;s question. Many of us want to know animal brains &amp; minds work. PB</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Brains and Minds (Edelman continued . . .)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:53:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16810</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16810</guid>
      <description>... The term didn&#39;t ring a bell, but after reading: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covert_channel ,yes I know of steganography, port knocking, etc. Can you</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Brains and Minds (Edelman continued . . .)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:51:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stuart W. Mirsky</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16809</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16809</guid>
      <description>... Sorry, I may be ignorant of this or that fact but that does not mean I am prepared to acquiesce to arguments from authority. Nevertheless, my skeptical</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Brains and Minds (Edelman continued . . .)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:49:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter Brawley</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16808</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16808</guid>
      <description>Michael, Thanks for the URL. You can learn a great deal from extracellular power spectral analysis of the sort he does, especially you can learn about </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Brains and Minds (Edelman continued . . .)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:44:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Eray Ozkural</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16807</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16807</guid>
      <description>On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Peter ... Computationalism is definitely not limited to discrete computers, and it is most certainly not a singular</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Brains and Minds (Edelman continued . . .)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:44:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stuart W. Mirsky</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16806</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16806</guid>
      <description>... But the issue here isn&#39;t what is theoretically possible but what is practically possible given an adequate theory of consciousness. As you know, mine is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Brains and Minds (Edelman continued . . .)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:37:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Michael Olea</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16805</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16805</guid>
      <description>... http://osiris.rutgers.edu/BuzsakiHP/Publications/publications.html -- M.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Brains and Minds (Edelman continued . . .)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:36:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stuart W. Mirsky</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16804</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16804</guid>
      <description>... I think (&quot;believe&quot;) that your proposal is at least in principle correct. However it is NOT the &quot;main philosophical problem.&quot; THAT appears to be the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Brains and Minds (Edelman continued . . .)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:32:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter Brawley</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16803</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16803</guid>
      <description>EO&gt;Theory of computation is not limited to digital computers. There you go again, with your two characteristic errors. First, you conflate computationalism (an</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Brains and Minds (Edelman continued . . .)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:27:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Eray Ozkural</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16802</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16802</guid>
      <description>Excuse me, it&#39;s George not Georges, Georges would have said something very harsh about vitalism. -- Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate.  Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Brains and Minds (Edelman continued . . .)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:12:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Eray Ozkural</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16801</guid>
      <description>On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Peter ... Theory of computation is not limited to digital computers. It has accounted for all kinds of computers, even</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Brains and Minds (Edelman continued . . .)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:08:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Eray Ozkural</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16800</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16800</guid>
      <description>... Good, but I don&#39;t think you are aware of his fundamental contributions to theory of computation (and artificial neural networks) in addition to being one</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Brains and Minds (Edelman continued . . .)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:06:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter Brawley</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16799</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16799</guid>
      <description>Eray, (i) the best evidence is that the mammalian brain is not a digital computer, (ii) I&#39;ve much respect for Marvin Minsky, (iii) since we are discussing how</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Brains and Minds (Edelman continued . . .)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:00:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Eray Ozkural</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16798</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16798</guid>
      <description>On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Peter ... It was obvious that I wrote that in reference to his claims on the purportedly absent capabilities of computers.</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Tue Jul  7 14:45:33 PDT 2009 -->
