<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ai-philosophy at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/</link>
    <description>Philosophical Foundations of AI</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: brain for AI</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:57:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>scanlonray</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17538</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17538</guid>
      <description>The thalamic reticular nucleus is a thin nucleus that is wrapped about the thalamus like a blanket. All the axons that pass from the thalamus to the cortex,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Consciousness As Qualia</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:50:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Francisco Boni</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17537</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17537</guid>
      <description>Timothy E. Kennelly ... You just realize that you are conscious after a volitional process, after something that, out of necessity, may triggered the need to </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>brain for AI</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:28:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>scanlonray</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17536</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17536</guid>
      <description>The brain, and especially the human brain, is the only thinking machine that we know of that works. Some say that Artificial Intelligence should base its</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>People are completely unaware of the needs and essence of the transh</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:54:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Eray Ozkural</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17535</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17535</guid>
      <description>I was reading an article criticizing Star Trek for its weak link to technology: http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2009/10/why_i_hate_star_trek.html </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI in a Different Era 2010</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:58:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Colin T. SCHMIDT</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17534</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17534</guid>
      <description>ART, IDENTITY &amp; DIGITALISATION 2010 CfP (sorry for any cross-postings): *Art, Identity and Digitalisation* ? S6 - April 8, 9-12 AM / 2-5 PM Symposium chairs:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cellular computing</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 23:35:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Michael Olea</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17533</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17533</guid>
      <description>Here&#39;s a new book (may 2009) on computation in single cells: Wetware: A Computer In Every Living Cell, by Dennis Bray. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Phenomenal representations vs. information theory</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Eray Ozkural</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17532</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17532</guid>
      <description>I think what the Knowledge Argument really tells us is that phenomenal representations have to exist, and subjective experience cannot be epiphenomenal. To</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Consciousness As Qualia</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:32:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>timothyekennelly</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17531</guid>
      <description>... Mr. Martin, Your claim seems to be that the conscious mind (or brain) constructs a reality which is false. If this is true, on what ground would we know it</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Consciousness As Qualia</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:50:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Fred Martin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17530</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17530</guid>
      <description>... Deceit works, even self deceit. In computer science it may be called &#39;indirection&#39; or &#39;pointers&#39;. Lower level, (subconscious)neural structures, &#39;point&#39;, as</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Consciousness As Qualia</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:57:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>timothyekennelly</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17529</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17529</guid>
      <description>Mr. Martin, If human consciousness creates a virtual reality which is &quot;a form of the &#39;deceit&#39;&quot; how does one ever move from it to the supposed &quot;mysterious</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Consciousness As Qualia</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:53:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Fred Martin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17528</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17528</guid>
      <description>... The brain supports a virtual reality : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_reality which through evolved inherited insanity is considered as reality. The</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>brain operation as science</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 18:22:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>scanlonray</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17527</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17527</guid>
      <description>Two nuclei are referred to by acronym: TRN ? Thalamic Reticular Nucleus. A nucleus that surrounds the thalamus. It takes input (en passant) from all</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Consciousness As Qualia</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 08:09:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Fred Martin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17526</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17526</guid>
      <description>It might be helpful to distinguish two separate realities 1. The virtual reality supported by your personal brain that you experience as &#39;reality&#39; by</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Consciousness As Qualia</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:47:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Michael Olea</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17525</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17525</guid>
      <description>... Purple phage all in my brain Lately things just don&#39;t seem the same ... I read recently that of the kajillion cells of a human body only about one in ten</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Consciousness As Qualia</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:59:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Eray Ozkural</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17524</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/17524</guid>
      <description>... Some of our distant bacterial cousins thrive on radioactive heavy metals. Even &quot;process&quot; those metals I&#39;ve heard. That&#39;s something, and very heavy metal as</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Nov 21 01:51:11 PST 2009 -->
