alternatepower at Yahoo! Groups

Re: grid tied "certified" install

Henry — Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:15:17 GMT

From a government bureaucracy point of view, alternative energy is not about energy independence for the individual. Sure, they'll sell it in part by using

alternate power

Charles Malone — Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:06:13 GMT

This is the ALTERNATE POWER group. Can we please get away from discussions that do not pertain to 'alternate" power. For example, nuke power is not

grid tied "certified" install

Charles Malone — Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:19:03 GMT

wow, only 3 cert installers for the whole state? What a joke/ripoff/scam. I wonder how they hide the kickback money? Someone needs to bring this to court

Re: alternate power incentives

Deenerz@... — Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:40:25 GMT

Try your local community colleges. My local one has certification courses. -Mike ... From: loosecannonsbluesband To:

Re: nukes

dan G — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:21:37 GMT

Each form has its own dangers and problems. It depends which dangers are considered more dangerous than the others. Not all of these dangers are resulting in

Re: nukes

Michael — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:14:22 GMT

gawd - talk about beating a dead horse

Re: nukes

John Grant — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:05:36 GMT

Are you really claiming that coal power production is less dangerous than nuclear power production? Are you really claiming that hydro power production is less

Re: nukes

Alex Markin — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:52:17 GMT

By now we have all learned several things in this group. Several among us believe that Nuclear power is bad Nuclear wastes are bad Both will be bad for a long

Re: nukes

John Grant — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:23:50 GMT

You did not answer the question: "Where did you come up with the 5,000 year number? Why not 5,000,000 years or 50 years? John Grant

Re: nukes

Henry — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:49:53 GMT

I'll answer the question directly: The question is fallacious and betrays a motivation that's not associated with its topic. I notice that you have inserted

Re: Past Peak Oil Travelling Towards Transition (Animation)

Henry — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:49:41 GMT

How cute. However, why is it that propaganda cartoons like this one conveniently omit the benefits to mankind that have come by way of fossil fuels? Henry

The China Greentech Report

Joseph Barbuto — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:48:53 GMT

An extremely detailed report that is propelling Red China to Green China.. Joseph http://www.china-greentech.com/sites/default/files/CGTR2009-FullReport.pdf

Seambiotic and Chinese Power Company to Build $10M Commercial Microa

Joseph Barbuto — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:48:31 GMT

http://www.greencarcongress.com/2009/12/seambiotic-20091204.html The upcoming decade will be one of accelerating breakthroughs for cleantech.. We still

Re: nukes

Alex Markin — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:51:18 GMT

The only answer that will provide absolute certainty is eradicate mankind. No other answer will provide that certainty. You are pouncing all over nuclear. We

Re: nukes

loosecannonsbluesband — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:45:30 GMT

Nuclear is the most dangerous way to produce power. We're getting a little tired hearing nuclear industry lobbyists and pro-nuclear politicians allege that