<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>amanda-users at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/</link>
    <description>AMANDA: Advanced Maryland Automatic Network Disk Archiver</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: backup very hit or miss</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:54:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Brian Cuttler</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68056</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68056</guid>
      <description>ah ha! We are backing up the amanda server, a FW, the old database system behind the FW and this new system. The DBA has been installing/configuring additional</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>wrong restore arguments at top of file</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:04:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>stan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68055</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68055</guid>
      <description>WE just recently rebuilt 2.6.1 on FreeBSD 7.2 STABLE, and this mornign I went to do a restore, to find out that the &quot;header&quot; in the file contains an incorect</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: backup very hit or miss</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:46:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Brian Cuttler</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68054</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68054</guid>
      <description>Amanda users, I check using amstatus this morning, we where pushing 70% and then the dump failed... We seem very consistent on the failure point. Tried the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SV: SL48 autoloader</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:42:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gunnarsson, Gunnar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68053</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68053</guid>
      <description>Yes Chris you are right it&#39;s an OS issue and I&#39;ve opened a case with SUN support. We want to use the sgen - Generic SCSI device driver to access the library in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: backup very hit or miss</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:27:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Nathan Stratton Treadway</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68052</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68052</guid>
      <description>... Well, I suppose it&#39;s possible that for some version or other of GNU tar this could just be because of a misleading error message, but my hunch would be</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: backup very hit or miss</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:07:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Brian Cuttler</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68051</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68051</guid>
      <description>Nathan, Yes, I saw what you saw in the gtar report - I can only surmize that the error is written in a confusing mannor. /proc is definitely a directory that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: backup very hit or miss</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:05:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Nathan Stratton Treadway</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68050</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68050</guid>
      <description>On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 16:27:44 -0500, Brian Cuttler wrote: [...] ... [...] ... [...] ... For what it&#39;s worth, tar&#39;s message here indicates that the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: backup very hit or miss</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:32:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Brian Cuttler</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68049</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68049</guid>
      <description>Frank, Dustin suggested the same, just checked and to my suprise the switch was present, up&#39;d it from 1800 to 2400 (seconds). It was the only DLE in the test</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: backup very hit or miss</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:26:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Frank Smith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68048</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68048</guid>
      <description>... You&#39;re probably on the edge of either the estimate or data timeout values (etimeout or dtimeout).  You could try increasing those values.  I&#39;m not familiar</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: backup very hit or miss</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:24:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dustin J. Mitchell</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68047</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68047</guid>
      <description>... It looks like a timeout of some sort.  Have you increased the various timeout parameters for this DLE? Dustin -- Open Source Storage Engineer </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: backup very hit or miss</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:21:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Brian Cuttler</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68046</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68046</guid>
      <description>Hi Dustin, ... I think the same but I haven&#39;t adjusted anything yet. Other than etimeout, what knobs do I have it 2.4.4 ? I thought timeouts where only an</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: backup very hit or miss</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:19:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dustin J. Mitchell</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68045</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68045</guid>
      <description>... I would think dtimeout would be the knob to tweak.  I have no idea if that was present in 2.4.4 though. ... The talk went well -- Nick did a great job and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>backup very hit or miss</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:02:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Brian Cuttler</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68044</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68044</guid>
      <description>Amanda users, The backup of this particular DLE is pretty much hit or miss, it&#39;ll run great for a week and then fail for a week, I haven&#39;t been able to disern</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dump failures</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Toomas Aas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68043</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68043</guid>
      <description>... I&#39;ve lost the beginning of this thread, but considering that flushing to daily-010 worked it should be fine. Maybe the labels do not look as nice as you&#39;d</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Newbie - Confused on How to Backup My WinXP PC to USB Disk</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:38:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul Bijnens</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68042</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/68042</guid>
      <description>... http://www.bing.com/maps/?v=2&amp;cp=sggbbshc5fs4&amp;scene=21014403&amp;lvl=2&amp;sty=b Right in the center you see the bike park, for about 15 bicycles even, with a</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Nov 23 09:12:43 PST 2009 -->
