<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>analytical-indicant-theory at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/</link>
    <description>ANALYTICAL  INDICANT  THEORY</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: M.Hosken</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:50:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gevans613@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9389</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9389</guid>
      <description>In a message dated 19/11/2009 10:47:22 GMT Standard Time, mike.hosken@... writes: I&#39;ll be  grateful for comments on my &quot;Hinges and Loops&quot; - Intro (with </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: For Richard, Antonio and Gary &amp; Uncle Tom Cobley and All</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:46:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Georges Metanomski</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9388</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9388</guid>
      <description>... =============== G: What the hell do PITS know about Heisenberg, Goedel and Hegel, unless they are synthetic PITS - camouflage under which Doctors,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: For Richard, Antonio and Gary &amp; Uncle Tom Co...</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:31:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Saicho@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9387</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9387</guid>
      <description>Jud:  small snip In the  event (because of the *principle* tag) most people assume that the thing is a  done deal - a discovered given of nature - an</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: For Richard, Antonio and Gary &amp; Uncle Tom Cobley and All</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:20:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Antonio Rossin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9386</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9386</guid>
      <description>Dear Jud, what bothers me, it is people in their reificationist modality of thinking - which modality I understand as un-healthy at both the individual- and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [nominalism] For Richard, Antonio and Ga...</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:24:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Saicho@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9385</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9385</guid>
      <description>In a message dated 11/17/2009 5:49:20 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, Zgmet@... writes: Heisemberg&#39;s Uncertainty Principle is misunderstood and off  topic: </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [nominalism] For Richard, Antonio and Gary &amp; Uncle Tom Cobley an</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:48:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Georges Metanomski</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9384</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9384</guid>
      <description>nominalism@yahoogroups.com, epistemology@yahoogroups.com, analytical-indicant-theory@yahoogroups.com Antonio: Fortunately, with the time passing, Heisemberg&#39;s</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [nominalism] Re:  For Richard, Antonio and Gary &amp; Uncle Tom Co..</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:28:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Georges Metanomski</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9383</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9383</guid>
      <description>nominalism@yahoogroups.com Cc: analytical-indicant-theory@yahoogroups.com, epistemology@yahoogroups.com ... =================== G: True, they don&#39;t BEAR</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>For Richard, Antonio and Gary &amp; Uncle Tom Cobley and All</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:36:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gevans613@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9382</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9382</guid>
      <description>Dear Jud, please notice: (unlike some totalitarian thinkers nearer to  us)  Hegel&#39;s dialectics, Heisenberg&#39;s uncertainty and Godel&#39;s  incompleteness do not</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: For Richard, Antonio and Gary &amp; Uncle Tom Co...</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:19:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Antonio Rossin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9381</guid>
      <description>Dear Jud, please notice: (unlike some totalitarian thinkers nearer to us) Hegel&#39;s dialectics, Heisemberg&#39;s uncertainty and Godel&#39;s incompleteness do not bear</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [nominalism] For Richard, Antonio and Gary &amp; Uncle Tom Cobley an</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:05:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gevans613@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9380</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9380</guid>
      <description>In a message dated 16/11/2009 13:58:41 GMT Standard Time, lofting@... writes: Chris writes ALL languages are grounded in the context of uncertainty</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Correction re: Archimedes.</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:11:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gevans613@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9379</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9379</guid>
      <description>I just noticed I said that Archimedes was a pre-Socratic.  In fact his dates are: c. 287 BC – c. 212 BC) whilst Plato&#39;s are (429–347 B. C.  E. Sincerely, </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: For Richard, Antonio and Gary &amp; Uncle Tom Co...</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:56:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gevans613@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9378</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9378</guid>
      <description>In a message dated 16/11/2009 17:18:42 GMT Standard Time, _Saicho@..._ (mailto:Saicho@...)  writes: Richard: previously I do not understand the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: For Richard, Antonio and Gary &amp; Uncle Tom Co...</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:18:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Saicho@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9377</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9377</guid>
      <description>Richard:  previously I do not understand the  comparison with Zeno?? From extensive defraction experimentation with electrons  [i. e. what can be called de</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [nominalism] For Richard, Antonio and Gary &amp; Uncle Tom Cobley an</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:03:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Antonio Rossin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9376</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9376</guid>
      <description>Hi, therefore, it seems to me, the needed elements of the puzzle are all visible and disposable on the stage. What we lack of, it is the ability to connect the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>For Richard, Antonio and Gary &amp; Uncle Tom Cobley and All.</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:47:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gevans613@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9375</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analytical-indicant-theory/message/9375</guid>
      <description>In a message dated 15/11/2009 _Saicho@..._ (mailto:Saicho@...) writes: Richard: IMO the Heisenberg principle must be seen as an epistemological</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Nov 21 10:39:09 PST 2009 -->
