ancient_chronology at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Did David and Solomon Exist?

Infowolf1@... — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:44:08 GMT

well, a column or pillar could be rounded or cornered, and the obelisk is not rounded but cornered, however there are round pillars to be seen on Egyptian

Re: Did David and Solomon Exist?

Larry — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:42:38 GMT

Regardung artifacts of Solomon, I would just like to interject that most documentation of Israelite kings are part of conflict records, from the stele of

Re: Did David and Solomon Exist?

zoe_lithoi — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:38:47 GMT

Hi Ian, The article you presented stated: "However, we are still lacking any contemporary or nearly-contemporary inscriptions which mention Solomon; at the

Astronomical events aligning with Low Chronology

Larry — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:54:55 GMT

Here is just the LIST of the astronomical events that can be linked to Low Chronology. Low Chronology is defined fundamentally as: 1. The end of the

Re: Did David and Solomon Exist?

Ian Onvlee — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:22:26 GMT

Hi Larry, Nice article, very easy readable! Regards, Ian Onvlee ________________________________ From: Larry To:

Did David and Solomon Exist?

Larry — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:48:24 GMT

Here's a rather well done article covering a lot of the bases on the current debae of David and Solomon I thought was worthwhile.

Re: Sir Isaac Newton and Low Chronology

Infowolf1@... — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:26:44 GMT

So who was Newton's source that was a Patriarch? Mary Christine In a message dated 11/8/2009 8:48:43 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, larsinger58@... writes:

Re: Sir Isaac Newton and Low Chronology

Larry Wilson — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:48:33 GMT

What I like about Newton is his details about Darius the Mede including confirming that he was the one who invented the Daric, which certainly suggests he was

Re: Sir Isaac Newton and Low Chronology

Opuslola@... — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:49:57 GMT

Yes Mary, it does sound a lot like Velikovsky! And Velikovsky should be ashamed for not giving Newton credit for it! Regards, Ron ... From: Infowolf1@...

Re: Sir Isaac Newton and Low Chronology

Infowolf1@... — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:28:59 GMT

This sounds like Velikovsky's take on things, I guess he got it from Newton. Who was the patriarch he cited, and what of that person's writings do we have to

Re: Low Chronology (the final countdown)

Opuslola@... — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:29:40 GMT

Ian, it seems to me that the Newtonian Chronology does not follow the currently accepted scheme? HIs views of the "shepards" or as we today seem to know them

Sir Isaac Newton and Low Chronology

bergendelperon — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:28:14 GMT

Hello Ron and all, Considerable attention should be directed to Certain Things that Newton wanted to emphasize in his 1728 Chronology book, bearing in mind at

Re: Low Chronology (the final countdown)

Opuslola@... — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:27:33 GMT

Hi, Ian! There seems to be no problem with me, since I tend to side with Newton on many issues, but (still to this day) are connected with modern "Chronolgy!"

Re: Low Chronology (the final countdown)

Ian Onvlee — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:08:59 GMT

Hi Ron, What seems to be the problem? Regards, Ian Onvlee ________________________________ From: "Opuslola@..." To:

Re: Low Chronology (the final countdown)

Opuslola@... — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:29:55 GMT

May I give you a little of the words of Isaac Newton, who wrote the following in his not authorized book, entitled "The History of Ancient Kingdoms, Amended",