<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ancientpapacy at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/</link>
    <description>Ancient Papacy</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Book: Popular History of the Catholic Church</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 22:25:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ChristianAction</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/43</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/43</guid>
      <description>I found this link http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_b?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&amp;field-keyw ords=popular&#43;history&#43;of&#43;the&#43;catholic&#43;church&amp;x=9&amp;y=15 Due to its</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>he can try.  Re: [AP] Re: Papal Primacy and Infallibility</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 20:51:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Collorafi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/42</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/42</guid>
      <description>And you wonder why so many Trads are becoming &quot;sede vecantist&quot;  (sp?) the Vatican is simply losing it&#39;s credibility. ... Actually it seems to me that there are</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended: Popular History of the Catholic Church</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:56:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Collorafi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/41</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/41</guid>
      <description>http://www.amazon.com/Popular-History-Catholic-Church-Philip/dp/00208564\ 07 If this link doesn&#39;t go through, I&#39;d be grateful if anyone could post a working</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Recommended: Popular History of the Catholic Church</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:50:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Collorafi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/40</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/40</guid>
      <description>http://www.amazon.com/Popular-History-Catholic-Church-Philip/dp/00208564\ 07 I&#39;d like to recommend, especially for inquirers to Catholicism like Louis, A</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Papal Primacy and Infallibility</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:11:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ann Smith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/39</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/39</guid>
      <description>... I agree.  After all, He chose Judas.  And although everyone agrees that what he did was wrong, great good came out of it.  God can use anyone.  Jesus</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Papal Primacy and Infallibility</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 18:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Louis Charles</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/38</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/38</guid>
      <description>I am more concerned with intentional, diabolical &quot;failures&quot; rather than &quot;failures&quot; per se.  The way I understand the workings of the Holy Spirit, one can turn</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Papal Primacy and Infallibility</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 18:52:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Louis Charles</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/37</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/37</guid>
      <description>ok.  But it is very confusing to me.  The concept seems so abstract whereas I am having a difficult time comprehending it. LC Christian Action</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Papal Primacy and Infallibility</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 18:34:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Christian Action</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/35</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/35</guid>
      <description>Catholics and non-Catholics need to stop confusing the definition of a pope&#39;s infallibility with what he does either by word or example. /s/ Nicholas Landholt,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>he can try.  Re: [AP] Re: Papal Primacy and Infallibility</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 17:46:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Collorafi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/34</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/34</guid>
      <description>Louis, The answer to your last two posts is in Pastor Aeternus, the dogmatic definition of the First Vatican Council, quoted below: ...we teach and define as a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>he can try.  Re: [AP] Re: Papal Primacy and Infallibility</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 17:37:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Louis Charles</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/33</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/33</guid>
      <description>... ********* and what if he tries?  And you wonder why so many Trads are becoming &quot;sede vecantist&quot;  (sp?)  the Vatican is simply losing it&#39;s credibility. LC </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Papal Primacy and Infallibility</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 17:36:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Louis Charles</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/32</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/32</guid>
      <description>isn&#39;t &quot;teaching&quot; and &quot;acting&quot; very often, one in the same.  &quot;Lead by example&quot; comes to mind.  In fact, one of the most memorable moments in my learning about</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Papal Primacy and Infallibility</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 23:02:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ann Smith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/31</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/31</guid>
      <description>This is exactly what they don&#39;t understand.  I&#39;m hoping that by making me give them examples, I can show that their understanding of infallibility is flawed. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Papal Primacy and Infallibility</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 22:18:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Collorafi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/30</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/30</guid>
      <description>Infallibility doesn&#39;t mean that popes will always act in a moral and holy manner, free of scandal-- although most popes up to about 500 A.D. were saints. It</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Papal Primacy and Infallibility</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 22:02:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ann Smith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/29</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/29</guid>
      <description>Go ahead and post away.  Like I said when I joined, I love learning about this stuff.  I think that getting any information from this period is difficult, so</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Papal Primacy and Infallibility</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 19:48:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ann Smith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/28</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ancientpapacy/message/28</guid>
      <description>Thanks!  She claims that apostolic succession is a joke and that anyone who has studied the subject knows that.  I&#39;ve quoted Matt. 16:18,19, but she hasn&#39;t</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Nov  9 12:18:43 PST 2009 -->
