http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/ AngelCog - Logic processing for AI Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:38:40 GMT Theodore H. Smith http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/161 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/161 ... I can't think of any examples where a group can also be an array. For example, two people can be a group of people. Great. But... if you put those two Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:06:32 GMT Theodore H. Smith http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/160 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/160 So... a question came into my mind today. Can something be both an array, and a group?? It kind of looks like it can't. I Can't really understand this problem Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:07:31 GMT Theodore H. Smith http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/159 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/159 So, I've been thinking more on arrays. Arrays really are the hardest part of AngelCog's basics. They are harder than relationships, hotlists, groups and types. Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:19:06 GMT Theodore H. Smith http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/158 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/158 maybe I defined those backward and confused split with join? Oh well. Nevermind. I'll code it the correct way and then document them when I feel sure of what Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:59:42 GMT Theodore H. Smith http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/157 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/157 So, I renamed "Serialise" and "unserialise", to "join" and "split" :) Simpler names! Also, more important, is that these names are WIDELY USED in programming Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:14:32 GMT Theodore H. Smith http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/156 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/156 So, whats it like to work on angelcog? "Is this what you want to do in life?" The answer to the second question is "yes, and no". Of course, like any sane Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:46:57 GMT Theodore H. Smith http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/155 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/155 So, I had this clever idea that I could do this: x = y[2 4] So, that would make x into an array of 4 items, starting from index "2". Great. One problem Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:46:58 GMT Theodore H. Smith http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/154 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/154 OK, so how do I model a "class" in AngelCog? Or a struct, even. Or an object? modelling one object, isn't too bad. MyVector = ["x":1000 "y":2000] Great. So x Sun, 27 Dec 2009 17:26:39 GMT Theodore H. Smith http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/153 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/153 So... I decided that I wanted to replace my array syntax. Before it was like this: x = array( a b c ) now, it should be like this: x = [a b c] I just... I Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:21:10 GMT Theodore H. Smith http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/152 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/152 So... AngelCog runs again. This is because I finally made a plan about what I need, and what I don't need, and in what order. Depedencies, basically! So... I Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:35:44 GMT Theodore H. Smith http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/151 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/151 OK, heres the answer! We DON'T rotate bits! We just... translate them downards! So, like this: A=010101 B=[A,A] B=010101 010101 You see! We just put each item Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:59:46 GMT Theodore H. Smith http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/150 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/150 ... ^^^^^^^^^^ One short, I mean, not one byte. Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:54:21 GMT Theodore H. Smith http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/149 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/149 OK, so basically, one thing is equal to one array. There is no case where two arrays with different contents, are equal. That makes things hugely simpler! Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:53:46 GMT Theodore H. Smith http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/148 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/148 So... I've been wrestling with all sorts of ideas and definitions. Arrays, arguments. Deciding "what is important to add", and "what is not important". I WANT Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:09:51 GMT Theodore H. Smith http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/147 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/angelcog/message/147 OK, I've just realised something obvious. Arguments relies on arrays. So, if I can't solve arrays, I can't solve arguments. I actually need to complete array