apologia at Yahoo! Groups

The right to hold a belief that isn't systematically classified as a

Gregkaye — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:47:08 GMT

The word 'myth' carries meanings associated either with fictitious narratives usually involving supernatural persons, actions, or events, with untrue or

Re: posting?

Robinson Mitchell — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:06:58 GMT

Welcome to the list, Gregory. The first terminological issue that occurs proceeds from your formulation of the problem: When you refer to the right of someone

posting?

Gregory Kaye — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:44:30 GMT

Hi, I was just hoping to post the following: The right to hold a belief that isn't systematically classified as a myth The word 'myth' carries meanings

Re: Arg from design?

Alex Popa — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:04:58 GMT

On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Matthew Brown wrote: ... maybe RAZA's creator doesn't meet the minimum requirements of

Re: Arg from design?

Matthew Brown — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:27:08 GMT

Raza Like a said, evolution does a terrible job of providing an initial cause (start of life). We rely on fictions to assure us that the creation of life was

Re: Arg from design?

rod_raza_2003 — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:35:25 GMT

... What you are talking about requires "Natural Selection". But natural selection requires "life". For something to be built up slowly over time, requires

Re: Arg from design?

Matthew Brown — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:51:01 GMT

Raza You would have to 'want' to believe that a landslide could create such a complex sentence of white rocks. The concepts of improbability and randomness

Re: Arg from design?

rod_raza_2003 — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:33:44 GMT

... Aloow for a million "land-slides" if you like to "form" the "highly improbable" sentence - 'The British Railways welcomes you to Wales'. The arguement

Re: Arg from design?

Matthew Brown — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:02:54 GMT

Rob My mistake; I am referring to the church, mainly the Catholic Church. We atheists are often generalized the same way. I do have a few examples that appear

Re: Arg from design?

Robinson Mitchell — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:16:17 GMT

Matthew wrote: I see more Christians adopting science into their reasoning of life. Traditionally Christianity has fought science at every turn in

Re: An Evangelical Dialogue on Evolution

Alex Popa — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:32:57 GMT

"the red queen" by matt ridely is the same red queen, it's about sex and why it is had, evolutionary-speaking. "the mating mind" by geoffrey miller is about

Re: An Evangelical Dialogue on Evolution

Robinson Mitchell — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:24:58 GMT

Rod wrote: Here's Michael Behe's (from the intelligent design movement, which is not creationist) blog http://www.amazon.com/gp/blog/A3DGRQ0IO7KYQ2

Re: An Evangelical Dialogue on Evolution

Robinson Mitchell — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:20:25 GMT

Alex wrote: on a slightly related note, rob, you ever read books on evolutionary psychology? "the red queen", "mating mind"? if you haven't, i bet

Re: Arg from design?

Matthew Brown — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:51:54 GMT

Rob I entered into an environment that allowed to express my opinion. I was not afforded this ability when I lived at home with my family. I entered the U.S.

Re: Arg from design?

Matthew Brown — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:35:13 GMT

Raza ... could not end up with an effect of these stones being arranged to spell 'The British Railways welcomes you to Wales' ? Which clearly would be the