<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>apologia at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/</link>
    <description>APOLOGETICS list</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Is the DNA code a language?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:58:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robinson Mitchell</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33726</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33726</guid>
      <description>Raza, I know your post was aimed primarily at skeptics, but as a fellow believer in Jesus Christ, I&#39;d like to add my two cents. In my training as a linguist</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is the DNA code a language?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:39:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stuart Axmaker</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33725</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33725</guid>
      <description>... No (Or &quot;yes, it is not a language&quot;). Not in any reasonable sense of the term &quot;language.&quot; It&#39;s not skepticism, either, it&#39;s the proper use of language</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is the DNA code a language?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:51:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Captain Trips</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33724</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33724</guid>
      <description>You mean a *programming* language?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is the DNA code a language?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 06:34:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>RAZA 2009</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33723</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33723</guid>
      <description>Before I present my case, I am interested to know if there are any other skeptics (other than Vern) who also think DNA is not a language?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>biblical faith (was Re: not a soul stirred)</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:06:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>RAZA 2009</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33722</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33722</guid>
      <description>... ok well I will remind you that I am arguing that the biblical definition of faith is not necessarily incompatible with evidence/reason/logic. And since you</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: biblical faith (was Re: not a soul stirred)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:03:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Vern</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33721</guid>
      <description>... Your biblical definition is very vague. Therefore, I&#39;ve used the examples found in the bible to clarify what is &quot;faith&quot; as used in the bible. ... I reserve</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>biblical faith (was Re: not a soul stirred)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:32:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>RAZA 2009</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33720</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33720</guid>
      <description>... It is possible we are talking past each other here. At this point I am arguing that the biblical *definition* of faith is compatible with a &quot;rational</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: biblical faith (was Re: not a soul stirred)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:28:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir Kornea</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33719</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33719</guid>
      <description>So far I got two responses to my question about faith, including an offlist post by some guy. Neither response actually addressed my question. One claimed that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: biblical faith (was Re: not a soul stirred)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:08:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Vern</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33718</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33718</guid>
      <description>... You fail to demonstrate that belief as described by the bible is not blind faith. I have shown it to be blind with many examples. There is no tangible </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>biblical faith (was Re: not a soul stirred)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:27:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>RAZA 2009</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33717</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33717</guid>
      <description>... You are almost correct here. You are correct it is &quot;not blind&quot; (which was my point), you are incorrect that it does not follow the biblical definition of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: not a soul stirred</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:41:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Vern</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33716</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33716</guid>
      <description>Actually, turning on a light switch is based upon inductive reasoning, which renders it not blind and doesn&#39;t follow the biblical definition of &quot;the assurance</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: not a soul stirred</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 01:52:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>RAZA 2009</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33715</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33715</guid>
      <description>... As explained it is not *necessarily* a blind leap of faith. For example. When you walk into a dark room and turn on the light switch. That is an act of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: not a soul stirred</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:28:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Vern</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33714</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33714</guid>
      <description>Quote, &quot;Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.&quot; (NASV) sure sounds like &quot;blind leap of faith&quot; to me. The only blind</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: not a soul stirred</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:03:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>RAZA 2009</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33713</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33713</guid>
      <description>... Just be aware that your definition has little to do with the biblical definition of faith. So when a Christian takes about having faith you should realize</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: not a soul stirred</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:20:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir Kornea</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33712</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apologia/message/33712</guid>
      <description>... Presupposition failure. Vlad</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- rss2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com uncompressed Sat May 25 22:31:41 PDT 2013 -->
