<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>aristotle-ethics at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/</link>
    <description>This list is intended to support slow re</description>

    <item>
      <title>NE 10.9: The End...</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:47:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/489</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/489</guid>
      <description>After the dazzling heights of the previous sections on reaching the divine, Aristotle returns to very practical matters, on how to educate the young toward</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NE 10.7-8: achieving  immortality</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:17:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/488</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/488</guid>
      <description>First I think it&#39;s necessary to return to section 6.12 (1144a) where Aristotle described the 4 parts of the soul and their virtues: &quot;First then let us assert</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NE 10.6: happiness as activity</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:29:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/487</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/487</guid>
      <description>It is difficult to see why Aristotle devotes a chapter to prove that playing games, amusements, which are done &quot;for themselves&quot; are not the greatest good. It</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NE 10.5: perfect and secondary pleasures</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:25:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/486</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/486</guid>
      <description>[On the diversity and hierarchy of pleasures. Th.] 1175a21-1176a29: This moreover is the ground for believing that pleasures vary in specific quality. For we</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NE 10.4: pleasure perfects activity</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 11:24:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/485</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/485</guid>
      <description>After another discussion against the anti-hedonists who consider pleasure as a mere movement, in section [5] Aristotle gives his own definition: &quot;For each</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NE 10.1: is pleasure good or bad?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:38:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/484</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/484</guid>
      <description>Here we return to the topic of book 7: Book 10 1172a19-1172b8: Our next business after this is doubtless to discuss Pleasure.For pleasure is thought to be</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NE 10.2: hedonists and anti-hedonists</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:38:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/483</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/483</guid>
      <description>[We have hedonists (Eudoxus) and anti-hedonists. Plato had already attempted to find a middle ground in the Philebus, but Aristotle rejects Plato&#39;s Good as</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NE 9.12: conclusion on friendship</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 06:02:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/482</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/482</guid>
      <description>1171b29-1172a15: As then lovers find their greatest delight in seeing those they love, and prefer the gratification of the sense of sight to that of all the </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NE 9.11: do we need friends more in prosperity or in adversity?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 06:02:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/481</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/481</guid>
      <description>[the main thing is to be active, share one&#39;s happiness with friends, and be there for them when they are in trouble. When one feels distressed, one should not</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NE 9.10: Ought we then to make as many friends as possible?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 06:01:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/480</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/480</guid>
      <description>1170b20-1171a20: Ought we then to make as many friends as possible? or, just as it seems a wise saying about hospitality--- &quot;Neither with troops of guests nor </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NE 9.9: can one be happy without friends?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 10:27:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/479</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/479</guid>
      <description>The main argument is: &quot;and if life is desirable, and especially so for good men, because existence is good for them, and so pleasant (because they are pleased</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NE 9.8: is loving onself selfish?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 10:52:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/478</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/478</guid>
      <description>The main idea is in ?7: &quot;Therefore the good man ought to be a lover of self, since he will then both benefit himself by acting nobly and aid his fellows; but</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NE 9.7: why loving is stronger than to be loved</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:44:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/477</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/477</guid>
      <description>&quot;loving seems to be an active experience [poiêsei] ,being loved a passive one [paschein]; hence affection and the various forms of friendly feeling are</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NE 9.6:  concord</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 06:14:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/476</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/476</guid>
      <description>1167a22-1167b16: Concord [homonoia] also seems to be a friendly feeling. Hence it is not merely agreement of opinion [homodoxia] , for this might exist even </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NE 9.5: goodwill</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:39:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/475</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aristotle-ethics/message/475</guid>
      <description>&quot;Goodwill seems therefore to be the beginning of friendship, just as the pleasure of the eye is the beginning of love.&quot; 1166b30-1167a21: 5. Goodwill [eunoia]</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Tue Nov 24 02:48:08 PST 2009 -->
