<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>astrotrac at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/</link>
    <description>AstroTrac</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Some advice please</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:52:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>D Marcotte</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2259</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2259</guid>
      <description>... than what&#39;s under it. If that is what it says, then I said it badly. The TV76 is 6lbs without dovetail plates and clamshells. The ast time I tried</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Some advice please</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:57:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>H P</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2258</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2258</guid>
      <description>Hey Don, As you well know, I&#39;m no expert at this but I&#39;d be happy to give you my thoughts and plans. You seem to think that what&#39;s above the AT is gonna be the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Some advice please</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:35:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>D Marcotte</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2257</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2257</guid>
      <description>Mark - I forgot to answer your tripod question. I am very wary of camera tripods. They don&#39;t have the stability of astro tripods. I have a Manfrotto 055CL and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Some advice please</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:30:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>D Marcotte</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2256</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2256</guid>
      <description>Mark - I find I can point reasonably accurately using a laser pointer. I created a hot shoe setup using the base of an old flash. The laser sits on my camera</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Some advice please</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:52:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mintmark_1</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2255</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2255</guid>
      <description>Hello, I&#39;m afraid I have no real advice, but I am a new member here in a similar situation. I have the Astrotrac photo kit and I am trying a William Optics</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Some advice please</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:20:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Adrien Richardson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2254</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2254</guid>
      <description>Hi Don I have been asking myself many similar questions, as I want to purchase the heavier TMB92 (9lbs). If I were to purchase the astrotrac, plus the larger </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Some advice please</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:32:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>D Marcotte</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2253</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2253</guid>
      <description>It&#39;s neen quite slow in this group so here is something to (hopefully) generate traffic. I just bought a used TV76 scope and am planning to use it with my</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: which affordable wide canon lens?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:13:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>H P</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2252</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2252</guid>
      <description>Hey Don and Leigh, Don, I&#39;ve used the following Oly OM Zuikos on the 450DM: 35mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8, 50mm f/1.4 (a superb lens for the $$$), 100mm f/2.8, 135mm</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: which affordable wide canon lens?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:37:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Roland Roberts</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2251</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2251</guid>
      <description>On 11/17/2009 02:53 PM, strewth78 wrote: [...] ... I have the 28/1.8 but confess I&#39;ve been mostly doing stuff with my Borg 45ED (256mm f/l).  I have not had a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lens comparisons</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:29:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Roland Roberts</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2250</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2250</guid>
      <description>On 11/19/2009 03:41 AM, Leigh Gold wrote: [...] Dude, you are killing my eyes with those HTML colors for the font.  I&#39;ve toggled it off for your messages, but</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lens comparisons</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:22:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Leigh Gold</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2249</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2249</guid>
      <description>Hi Don The Olympus Zuikos are OM fitting. You can get adapters from Ebay to fit Zuikos to Canon Dslrs. This side of the pond, you can get them for about £10</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lens comparisons</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:51:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>D Marcotte</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2248</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2248</guid>
      <description>Perry - Follow on question? Are the Zuiko&#39;s Olympus OM lenses? What adapter does one use for a Canon body? I have an M42 or some such thing. Is that it? Don </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: which affordable wide canon lens?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:49:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>D Marcotte</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2247</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2247</guid>
      <description>Perry - How are the wide angle Zuikos for distortion? Both Canon and Nikon lenses, whether zoom or prime, have lousy distortion stats at wide angles. For</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lens comparisons</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:42:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Leigh Gold</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2246</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2246</guid>
      <description>Hi Perry, I had the opportunity to meet Richard at his works yesterday and, I raised the issue of lens preference during our discussion. He praised the Canon</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: which affordable wide canon lens?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:39:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>H P</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2245</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrotrac/message/2245</guid>
      <description>Hey &quot;78&quot;, I like the manual focus Oly Zuiko 35mm, f/2.8.  Don&#39;t have the 28mm, which comes in f/2.8 and f/3.5.  It should be a good WA lens, based on the</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Nov 22 17:39:12 PST 2009 -->
