<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>atc_windows at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/</link>
    <description>ATC Windows  Sector Building Exchange </description>

    <item>
      <title>Array bounds error</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:31:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1247</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1247</guid>
      <description>To everyone with array bounds errors - I believe I&#39;ve fixed it. The problem arises when you have two action seps in the same sector, but not the player&#39;s</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A problem with standard routes Designer NOTAM</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:07:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1246</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1246</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ve uploaded 5.11.19 developer. This is now required for using standard routes as the data structures have been changed. The good news is that they are more</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A problem with standard routes Designer NOTAM</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:43:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1245</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1245</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ve been testing O&#39;Hare and I&#39;ve discovered and design flaw. Basically the system I have works well if you only have one standard route in a &#39;route&#39; and if</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Routes.txt anomoly</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:56:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gfj93</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1244</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1244</guid>
      <description>Alan, Well actually I didn&#39;t really use it.  I was however checking everything step by step being the first time I&#39;d created the binary file.  Having not</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Seattle center sectors</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bob Raemer</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1243</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1243</guid>
      <description>Dick, I did some sectors for ATCC years ago that were never finished or released.  It&#39;s mostly jets and some turboprops involving the major airports.  I would</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Seattle center sectors</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:24:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>norweegan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1242</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1242</guid>
      <description>Hi, I am a retired ATC from Seattle ARTCC.  I retired back in 2000.  Is there anyone who has developed any of the Seattle sectors?  I have been contemplating</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Routes.txt anomoly</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:06:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1241</guid>
      <description>Guy, That is just incredible! I changed the ROUTES.TXT file a long time ago to restrict it to routes active in the sector. This was because some developers do</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Routes.txt anomoly</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:54:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gfj93</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1240</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1240</guid>
      <description>Alan, I just tried using developer for the first time with some data I wrote a couple of years ago.  All seems to work fine, except I was a little concerned</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5.11.10</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:11:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1239</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1239</guid>
      <description>Please note that the latest version of AtcWindows has a modified sep model. I changed the model a few months back when I had problems with aircraft that were</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5.11.8 Developer</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:52:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1238</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1238</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ve just uploaded 5.11.8 developer which has a bug fix (for approach sectors only) and a new feature. Alan [Non-text portions of this message have been</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DV Speed Assignment</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:14:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>atcincanada</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1237</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1237</guid>
      <description>Hey there, Bob is correct in how things work up here in Canada. I&#39;ll check to see if/when the rules get bent a bit (in trail traffic/type) but for the most</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DV Speed Assignment</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:55:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bob Raemer</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1236</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1236</guid>
      <description>Alan, The general answer is for the U.S. is no.  However it doesn&#39;t apply more than 12 miles from the coast - but that may in turn be restricted by a procedure</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DV Speed Assignment</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 10:11:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1235</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1235</guid>
      <description>Bob, Thanks for this, and it is what I expected. Your explanation raised another question though:- on this side of the Atlantic there is another speed command</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DV Speed Assignment</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 04:04:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bob Raemer</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1234</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1234</guid>
      <description>Alan, You raised an interesting point about charted departure speeds, so I looked at a couple of charts on the FAA web site at airports where I could remember</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DV Speed Assignment</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:27:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1233</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atc_windows/message/1233</guid>
      <description>OK folks, What should happen is no different from before except that DV implies descent to the lowest altitude restriction. If DV is given as a sep command and</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Jul 13 05:56:27 PDT 2009 -->
