<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>atm_free at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/</link>
    <description>Amateur Telescope Making </description>

    <item>
      <title>Hubble was OpenFringe Strehl calcualation was Re: RTAFT program</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 23:22:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23471</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23471</guid>
      <description>Having seen it happen multi million quid wise more than once there is a tendency to worry about ones job. Get by some how and hope to find another quickly and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hubble was OpenFringe Strehl calcualation was Re: RTAFT program</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 23:12:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23470</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23470</guid>
      <description>LOL John</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A Bath interferometer used on a 40 inch F3.6 mirror [3 Attachm..</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 22:36:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>aplanatic@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23469</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23469</guid>
      <description>Very interesting, Dale. Do you know how many waves of astigmatism was in the mirror in the &quot;before&quot; picture? In the 42&quot; that we figured at El Camino College in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Bath interferometer used on a 40 inch F3.6 mirror</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 21:27:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dale Eason</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23468</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23468</guid>
      <description>There is a group woking a 40 inch F3.6 and I have been helping them understand how to use interferometry and OpenFringe to test it. Here is a sample</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hubble was OpenFringe Strehl calcualation was Re: RTAFT program</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 20:40:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mike Coslo</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23467</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23467</guid>
      <description>... I do kind of like the star test. The eyes open are handy at that point. Actually, I never quite trust myself with testing. - Mike -</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hubble was OpenFringe Strehl calcualation was Re: RTAFT program</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 20:37:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mike Coslo</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23466</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23466</guid>
      <description>... They took the typical path, which is to believe the more sensitive test. After all, being more sensitive, it had to be better - right? - Mike -</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hubble was OpenFringe Strehl calcualation was Re: RTAFT program</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:43:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>atmpob</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23465</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23465</guid>
      <description>Richard 1941 how did you spoof Mel&#39;s email address?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hubble was OpenFringe Strehl calcualation was Re: RTAFT program</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:57:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mel Bartels</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23464</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23464</guid>
      <description>Same thing we do when software unit tests fail working code. Think of it: you have tests and code to maintain, to learn, to get correct. Now you have to learn</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hubble was OpenFringe Strehl calcualation was Re: RTAFT program</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:40:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>atmpob</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23463</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23463</guid>
      <description>Yes, but what do you do if the two tests don&#39;t agree.  How do you decide which one to believe.  That was the Hubble managers delima. I see that my Hubble law</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OpenFringe Strehl calcualation was Re: RTAFT program</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 12:25:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23462</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23462</guid>
      <description>Actually despite cost savings being mentioned in the news even before it was put up there all sorts of things are possible. There was even a stage when the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenFringe Strehl calcualation was Re: RTAFT program</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 09:56:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Nils Olof Carlin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23461</guid>
      <description>John, ... omit a 2nd test. It isn&#39;t difficult to imagine what proportion of total project costs that would be. It was not omitted: &quot;The panel found, for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OpenFringe Strehl calcualation was Re: RTAFT program</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 08:57:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23460</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23460</guid>
      <description>The real problem with Hubble was cost saving Vladimir - deciding to omit a 2nd test. It isn&#39;t difficult to imagine what proportion of total project costs that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenFringe Strehl calcualation was Re: RTAFT program</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 07:25:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23459</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23459</guid>
      <description>Paul, Remembering the  Hubble mirror scandal I can not help  to think that in quoted text you were justly sarcastic. ... From: paul valleli Vladimir, Nils, It</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bath innterferogram at last</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 07:13:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23458</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23458</guid>
      <description>Guy, Alan and Bill, Congratulation on success. This message makes me a day. Guy, your previous attitude to Bath interferometry maketh me believe that you will</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bath innterferogram at last</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 06:16:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>paul valleli</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23457</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atm_free/message/23457</guid>
      <description>Guy, One other thing, If you cannot control the fringe pattern for number of rings with an RoC shift or change the &quot;wedge&quot; with the translation screws, you may</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- rss2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com uncompressed Sat May 25 16:52:17 PDT 2013 -->
