<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>aworldatwar at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/</link>
    <description>Forum for GMT&#39;s  &quot;A World At War&quot;</description>

    <item>
      <title>Raiders too good</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:28:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Moodey, William</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119685</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119685</guid>
      <description>One thing I have noticed is that raiders routinely do far more damage in the game than they did historically.  Partially because players simply raid more than</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Atlantic to date</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:54:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>RScheers</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119684</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119684</guid>
      <description>... Sorry -- I mispoke.  The file is in the files section. Randy</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Atlantic to date</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:21:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>donmoody@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119683</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119683</guid>
      <description>... Because of previous issues with attachments, attachments are not allowed in the AWAW forum. Instead, files should be placed in the files section, where</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Atlantic to date</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:56:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>RScheers</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119682</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119682</guid>
      <description>... The details are in the attached file &#39;BOTA-Samples-RS.xls&#39;.  If you want the summary, it is in a previous post.  I can go back and find it it your want. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Atlantic to date</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:33:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>donmoody@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119681</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119681</guid>
      <description>... Refresh my memory - what was &quot;game 1&quot;? DonMoody</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Atlantic to date</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:11:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bruce Harper</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119680</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119680</guid>
      <description>I disagree.  In a game where the results are near the norm (which is the majority of the games), the change won&#39;t make that much of a difference.  It just</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Atlantic to date</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:07:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>RScheers</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119679</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119679</guid>
      <description>I went back into game 1, looked up all of the rolls, and re-ran the BOTA with this change.  I was surprised by the results.  I though it would help some, but</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Atlantic to date</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:54:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>donmoody@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119678</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119678</guid>
      <description>... That last part should have been &quot;... and needs *no* adjustment&quot;. DonMoody</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Atlantic to date</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:50:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>donmoody@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119677</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119677</guid>
      <description>... This was a transcription/translation error. ... This is the one I prefer because, like you said, &quot;a sunk transport is a sunk transport&quot;. Either the level</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Atlantic to date</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:44:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>donmoody@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119676</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119676</guid>
      <description>... I can&#39;t agree with either of these. Either the level of transports losses is a problem or the level of transport losses is not a problem. The source of the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Atlantic to date</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:30:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>nt2peter3</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119675</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119675</guid>
      <description>I would prefer to leave the raiders out of the SW adjustment modifier, since (a) it&#39;s a different mechanic, and (b) there is a lot more risk to raiding than to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Atlantic to date</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:26:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>RScheers</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119674</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119674</guid>
      <description>... Yes.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Atlantic to date</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:47:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>donmoody@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119673</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119673</guid>
      <description>Are losses from raiders a factor in when Cash &amp; Carry can be used? DonMoody</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Atlantic to date</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:42:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119672</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119672</guid>
      <description>I think a logical way to reinstate a USAT modifier in the event of severe transport losses would be a &#43;1 for any turn that the number of operable transports</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Atlantic to date</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:36:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bruce Harper</dc:creator>
      <link>http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119671</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/aworldatwar/message/119671</guid>
      <description>There are two ways of looking at luck in this context. Let&#39;s use the Russian winter roll as an example.  Let&#39;s say the extreme, pro-Axis result (a mild winter)</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Dec  2 14:52:37 PST 2009 -->
