<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>bacnet-it-wg at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/</link>
    <description>BACnet-IT-WG</description>

    <item>
      <title>New file uploaded to bacnet-it-wg </title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 13:35:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/181</guid>
      <description>Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the bacnet-it-wg group. File        :</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [bacnet-dm] Update to Web Services Addendum (rev 11)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 14:18:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave Robin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/180</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/180</guid>
      <description>I agree entirely. A good list of scopes/roles would greatly enhance plug and play with auth servers (your six is better than my three, but I don&#39;t anticipate</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [bacnet-dm] Update to Web Services Addendum (rev 11)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:48:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Carl Neilson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/179</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/179</guid>
      <description>I liked the idea of the OAuth scope being a mix of application area and role. With a site/deployment controlled application area and a standardized role, I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [bacnet-dm] Update to Web Services Addendum (rev 11)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:31:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave Robin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/178</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/178</guid>
      <description>That was going out on a limb a bit just to get a straw man out there. In our call we had left it that the realms were required to be writable so sites could be</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [bacnet-dm] Update to Web Services Addendum (rev 11)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:59:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Carl Neilson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/177</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/177</guid>
      <description>Dave, Can you comment further on the pre-amble comment: *             It was felt that scopes were akin to roles and that there should be some kind of mapping.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Update to Web Services Addendum (rev 11)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:21:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave Robin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/176</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/176</guid>
      <description>Data Modelers (and IT-WG, only when we mess with the TLS/OAuth part) Here is the update based on last week&#39;s conference call.  Please join us this Thursday to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IT-WG San Francisco meeting announcement and agenda (May 7, 2013)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:22:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James F. Butler</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/175</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/175</guid>
      <description>Dear BACnet IT-WG members, The IT-WG will meet in San Francisco on Tuesday, May 7, 2013 from 8:00 until 10:30 a.m. PDT.  See</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Update of BI-041</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:46:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Isler, Bernhard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/174</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/174</guid>
      <description>Hi all, The update of BI-041, as of Dallas discussion and Siemens-internal review, is available on the Yahoo group (may also be available on the Twiki soon).</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Update to Web Services Addendum (rev 10)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:15:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave Robin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/173</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/173</guid>
      <description>Data Modelers (and IT-WG), Here is an update to the draft based on the last two conference calls.  This mostly focussed on the security aspects that we have</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Thoughts on a common foundation for web services and NTB binary </title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:55:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Isler, Bernhard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/172</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/172</guid>
      <description>Dave, Sorry for creating confusion here. The first &#39;common&#39; is about common functionality (e.g. TLS, Certificate Management, OAuth) The second &#39;common&#39; means</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Thoughts on a common foundation for web services and NTB binary </title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:33:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave Robin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/171</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/171</guid>
      <description>Bernhard, I&#39;m not quite sure I follow you on your second paragraph. In the first paragraph, you seemed to leave out resources from the &quot;common foundation&quot;, but</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Thoughts on a common foundation for web services and NTB binary </title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:14:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Isler, Bernhard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/170</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/170</guid>
      <description>Dave, Out of the below list, I believe that &quot;TLS certificates&quot; and &quot;OAuth 2.0&quot; are general concepts that could be extracted from the web services draft and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Request for meeting topics</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:35:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James F. Butler</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/169</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/169</guid>
      <description>Dear BACnet IT-WG members, We will hold a face-to-face meeting during the BACnet committee meetings to be held May 6-10, 2013 at the Pacific Energy Center in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thoughts on a common foundation for web services and NTB binary serv</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:24:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave Robin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/168</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/168</guid>
      <description>IT-WG members, In Dallas, there was some discussion about trying to come up with a common foundation for BACnet web services and NTB binary services.  This is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>My apologies for the old signature line!  Re: Update to BACnet/WS RE</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 04:47:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave Robin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/167</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bacnet-it-wg/message/167</guid>
      <description>Oops.  I don&#39;t usually use this secondary computer to send email.  Sorry, Carl. On Mar 11, 2013, at 12:26 AM, Dave Robin &lt;yahoo@...&gt; wrote: ...... a</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- rss2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com uncompressed Mon May 20 02:12:10 PDT 2013 -->
