<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>bathtubbrewers at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/</link>
    <description>Bathtub Brewers - A relaxing, worry-free</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: To Rack or Not to Rack???</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:27:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>pbooks@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19887</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19887</guid>
      <description>Your pretty good in a primary for about a month and secondary for pretty much until you have time to get to it. I&#39;m guessing an Ale so your room temp, as long</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: To Rack or Not to Rack???</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mr soul</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19886</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19886</guid>
      <description>If it is already in the secondary I would not be concerned with leaving it on the small amount of yeast at the bottom of the carboy.  If it was me and I was</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>To Rack or Not to Rack???</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:55:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19885</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19885</guid>
      <description>I brewed a batch a couple of weeks ago.  I let it go through primary fermentation and then racked it to a secondary carboy.  It has been there for about 2</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What are all the cookbook events on the calendar</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:08:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>brwmeistr</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19884</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19884</guid>
      <description>... Did this site get spammed?  My personal yahoo calendar is swamped everyday with some kind of cookbook advertisement linked back to this website.  Do I need</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: mash tun manifold</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:57:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mike Firosz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19883</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19883</guid>
      <description>In fact, you don&#39;t lose any efficiency by batch sparging.  You pull off the first run, calculate how much more you need to reach your boil volume and add that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: mash tun manifold</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:27:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bob O.</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19882</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19882</guid>
      <description>That&#39;s way I understand it as well but only for fly sparging.  Batch sparging is all about getting the wort out as fast as possible.  If it channels then all</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: mash tun manifold</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:07:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bill Keiser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19881</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19881</guid>
      <description>as i understand it, channeling is not good. you want the water to flow evenly down through all the grain to flush out the wort. if it channels, it just flows</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: mash tun manifold</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:28:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Basic Poke</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19880</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19880</guid>
      <description>That looks very nice.  I need to build something soon, thinking of using a braided stainless hose.  Remember, if you batch sparge and probably sacrifice a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: mash tun manifold</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:36:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bob O.</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19879</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19879</guid>
      <description>This is very nice.  Since the other Bill brought up the flow dynamics have you looked at John Palmer&#39;s book How To Brew?  www.howtobrew.com  He has a real good</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: mash tun manifold</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:20:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bill Keiser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19878</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19878</guid>
      <description>good point. i hadn&#39;t considered that possibility. making it smaller would reduce the inlet area(not to mention more work!). i wonder if making a plastic or</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: mash tun manifold</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:07:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bill Funkhouser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19877</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19877</guid>
      <description>Nice looking work, Bill.  One thing to consider: When I design the mash tun pick up tube, I try to keep it about 2/3 the width of the container.  If the device</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>mash tun manifold</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:58:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bill Keiser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19876</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19876</guid>
      <description>i just made this mash tun, copied straight off our local brewing supply store&#39;s equipment. i hadn&#39;t seen this particular design anywhere else before. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>measuring ABV</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:02:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bill Keiser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19875</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19875</guid>
      <description>... this reminded me of a formula i saw a while back. it is based on the fact that hydrometers and refractometers are not measuring the exact same thing. i</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Do any of you use Plato?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:12:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>paulkidger@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19874</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19874</guid>
      <description>I use a factor of 4. ie a 1048 OG would be approximately 12&#39;Plato (Balling or Brix).  In fact it is 12.15 ie equivalent to 12.15% % sucrose. It is not exactly</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Do any of you use Plato?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:41:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bob Davis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19873</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bathtubbrewers/message/19873</guid>
      <description>... Hi, Scott! Here&#39;s a formula to get you from OG to P and vice versa: {Plato/(258.6-([Plato/258.2]*227.1)}&#43;1 = Specific gravity Hell, I just use a conversion</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Tue Jul  7 09:39:53 PDT 2009 -->
