bca-eforum at Yahoo! Groups

Re: OPR and the Design Charette

Mark Miller — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:37:11 GMT

Kent, Great advice as always. Mark Miller Sent from my Windows Mobile phone ... From: Kent B Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 6:19

Re: OPR and the Design Charette

Kent B — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:19:17 GMT

We have done combined OPR and design charettes. It works good for getting people involved with the whole project early but there are a LOT of people waiting

OPR and the Design Charette

BradA — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:05:45 GMT

Does anyone have experience combining a Design Charette with an OPR workshop? OR Any general comments on an OPR workshop Vs. a Design Charette Thanks, Brad

Re: LEED and the OPR

Bryan Welsh — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 02:04:37 GMT

Mih0327, It does not sound to me like your read on this subject is at odds with anything that has been posted. Sounds like you take a flexible approach to

Re: LEED and the OPR

mih0327 — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:34:49 GMT

All, I might have a different read on the OPR and BoD process than others who have posted to this topic. My take, based on my read of the LEED requirements as

Re: LEED and the OPR

Bryan Welsh — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:13:24 GMT

Brad, I echo Gretchen's sentiments on the OPR. We have done a few LEED projects in Idaho and found them to be no different than anyplace else and yes we did

Re: Code requiring Cx?

Robin Weyand-Gardner — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:58:15 GMT

I agree, this entire discussion has wandered completely off course. There are many excellient commissioning professionals that ARE NOT PE's and there are

Re: LEED and the OPR

Gretchen Coleman — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:37:32 GMT

Brad, I have been working in an established market for years and the OPR is still the hardest document to get, followed closely by the BOD. Many team members

Re: Code requiring Cx?

Eric O'Neill — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:35:21 GMT

All, I feel like discourse is quickly declining. Can we try to use this forum for constructive (get it?) conversation, please? Eric O'Neill Mechanical

LEED and the OPR

BradA — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:03:39 GMT

Hello All, I'm in Idaho and Cx is just stating to gain a foot hold. It is standard for people in our area to only think of Cx in terms of LEED and difficult

Re: Code requiring Cx?

Joseph Ting — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:41:14 GMT

You won't "LOOSE" it, but you will definitely "LOSE" your professional license as well as your integrity other than just the almighty dollars. ... From: Paul

Re: Code requiring Cx?

Paul Sampson — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:44:02 GMT

A janitor will not loose his license to continue being a janitor. A PE has more than just money to loose. _____ From: bca-eforum@yahoogroups.com

Re: Code requiring Cx?

Dale — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:34:39 GMT

Actually anyone can be named personally in any lawsuit. Doesn't mean it's a good lawsuit, but anyone can be named personally, even the janitor or the

Re: Code requiring Cx?

Paul Sampson — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:22:33 GMT

I think a PE has more to do with liability than anything else. A PE can be personally named in a law suit. Paul Sampson, PE _____ From:

Re: Code requiring Cx?

bldg_commissioning — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:43:37 GMT

David, I may have come off a little strong in my opinion. Accept my apology. The point is that EXPERIENCE is the best teacher when it comes to commissioning.