bell_bohm at Yahoo! Groups

de Broglie-Bohm Conference: 28 Aug 2010 - 4 Sep 2010

Dennis May — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:57:41 GMT

Many big players in physics - list toward the bottom of the link. 21st-century directions in de Broglie-Bohm theory and beyond Conference: 28 Aug 2010 - 4

Re: Bohmian Explanation of Superconductivity

Dennis May — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:16:29 GMT

Physicists Measure Elusive 'Persistent Current' That Flows Forever http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091011071349.htm I had not heard of this

Re: Bohmian Explanation of Superconductivity

Dennis May — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:07:59 GMT

Several bloggers mentioned the same thing you have. The popular press accounts attempted to portray it as support for "string theory" generally - a first

Re: Bohmian Explanation of Superconductivity

rpffan — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:15:30 GMT

Note this is an application of some mathematical techniques associated with string theory (namely AdS/CFT) rather than an application of "string theory" as a

Re: Bohmian Explanation of Superconductivity

dennislmay@... — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:07:06 GMT

There is a recent paper where for the first time a practical application has been found for string theory in relation to high temperature superconductivity.

Re: Bohmian Explanation of Superconductivity

Dennis May — Thu, 07 May 2009 18:31:58 GMT

That is what I thought the approach would be. I read Bohm's "Wholeness and the Implicate Order" but not "The Undivided Universe". I will have to get a

Re: Bohmian Explanation of Superconductivity

rpffan — Thu, 07 May 2009 16:55:12 GMT

Bohm gives an interesting account of superconductivity, on the BCS level, in *The Undivided Universe*, which despite its name is basically a textbook on

Bohmian Explanation of Superconductivity

Dennis May — Thu, 07 May 2009 01:33:11 GMT

Superconductivity discussed. http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0812/0812.4118v1.pdf A general short description of Bohmian Mechanics

Qualities of Non-Linear QM

dennislmay@... — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:59:30 GMT

John S. Bell outlined why Bohmian Mechanics works to produce the same results as conventional indeterministic quantum mechanics. Among the

Re: Update from Moderator

rpffan — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:12:17 GMT

Hi Phil. I was the one who created this group way back when. I handed moderation over to Travis at some point. When I started the group, I was a grad student

Re: Update from Moderator

Phil Warnell — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:27:22 GMT

Hi Eric, It's been a long time since I've seen anything except spam posted and interestingly enough all you erasers took us back to my last post. I also

Re: Yahoo! Groups: Welcome to bell_bohm. Visit today!

Douglas Early — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:13:15 GMT

On 3/9/09 10:09 AM, "bell_bohm Moderator" ... I have a degree in astronomy from Caltech, where I was a student in Richard

Bohm-Like Mechanics for Non-Linear QM

Dennis May — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:18:14 GMT

In 1924 - pre-dating conventional quantum mechanics - de Broglie viewed the foundations of QM as being due to the interactions of internal clock-like

Spontaneous entanglement and the work of Gregory S. Duane

Dennis May — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:21:50 GMT

The classical foundation for a new quantum mechanics: Duane, G.S., 2001: Violation of Bell’s inequality in synchronized hyperchaos, Found. Phys. Lett.,

Update from Moderator

rpffan — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:06:44 GMT

This group has been inactive for a long time, and I've had to clean up a bunch of spam and ban offenders. New members will need to be approved before they can