<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>bell_bohm at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/</link>
    <description>on Bell inequalities and the de Broglie-Bohm pilot wave version of QM</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: [Physics_Frontier] Questions About &quot;Three Slit Experiment&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:23:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dennis May</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1567</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1567</guid>
      <description>I don&#39;t believe there ever was a difficulty - I was just having a hard time digesting some of the incorrect or misleading explanations from the assorted </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [Physics_Frontier] Questions About &quot;Three Slit Experiment&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:21:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dennis May</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1566</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1566</guid>
      <description>I believe my questions about the &quot;Three Slit Experiment&quot; came about because upon reading about it from several sources some approached it incorrectly implying</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [Physics_Frontier] Questions About &quot;Three Slit Experiment&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:14:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dennis May</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1565</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1565</guid>
      <description>Another comment further on:   &quot;Florian: Total destructive interference occurs in the 3-slit experiment by the cancellation of the wave amplitudes from the 3</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [Physics_Frontier] Questions About &quot;Three Slit Experiment&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:09:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jon Lang</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1564</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1564</guid>
      <description>I&#39;m not seeing what the difficulty is.  In the dBB interpretation, the wave function takes all three slits into account and defines the usual probability</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [Physics_Frontier] Questions About &quot;Three Slit Experiment&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:01:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dennis May</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1563</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1563</guid>
      <description>From the 1st comment at the bottom of the link:   &quot;The conclusion should be: yes all radiation is able to split and travel along all different routes</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Questions About &quot;Three Slit Experiment&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:50:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dennis May</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1562</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1562</guid>
      <description>http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100722/full/news.2010.371.html  I am trying to understand the de Broglie - Bohm explanation of the three slit experiment.  A</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>de Broglie-Bohm Conference: 28 Aug 2010 - 4 Sep 2010</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:57:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dennis May</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1558</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1558</guid>
      <description>Many big players in physics - list toward the bottom of the link.   21st-century directions in de Broglie-Bohm theory and beyond Conference: 28 Aug 2010 - 4</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bohmian Explanation of Superconductivity</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:16:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dennis May</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1557</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1557</guid>
      <description>Physicists Measure Elusive &#39;Persistent Current&#39; That Flows Forever   http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091011071349.htm   I had not heard of this</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bohmian Explanation of Superconductivity</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:07:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dennis May</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1556</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1556</guid>
      <description>Several bloggers mentioned the same thing you have.  The popular press accounts attempted to portray it as support for &quot;string theory&quot; generally - a first</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bohmian Explanation of Superconductivity</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:15:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rpffan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1555</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1555</guid>
      <description>Note this is an application of some mathematical techniques associated with string theory (namely AdS/CFT) rather than an application of &quot;string theory&quot; as a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bohmian Explanation of Superconductivity</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:07:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dennislmay@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1554</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1554</guid>
      <description>There is a recent paper where for the first time a practical application has been found for string theory in relation to high temperature superconductivity.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bohmian Explanation of Superconductivity</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:31:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dennis May</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1553</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1553</guid>
      <description>That is what I thought the approach would be.  I read Bohm&#39;s &quot;Wholeness and the Implicate Order&quot; but not &quot;The Undivided Universe&quot;.  I will have to get a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bohmian Explanation of Superconductivity</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:55:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rpffan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1552</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1552</guid>
      <description>Bohm gives an interesting account of superconductivity, on the BCS level, in *The Undivided Universe*, which despite its name is basically a textbook on</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bohmian Explanation of Superconductivity</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 01:33:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dennis May</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1551</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1551</guid>
      <description>Superconductivity discussed.   http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0812/0812.4118v1.pdf   A general short description of Bohmian Mechanics   </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Qualities of Non-Linear QM</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:59:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dennislmay@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1550</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bell_bohm/message/1550</guid>
      <description>John S. Bell outlined why Bohmian Mechanics works to produce the same results as conventional indeterministic quantum mechanics.  Among the</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- rss2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com uncompressed Tue May 21 05:03:51 PDT 2013 -->
