<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>biopoet at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/</link>
    <description>Biopoetics</description>

    <item>
      <title>The Neural Imagination: Aesthetic and Neuroscientific Approaches to </title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:22:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>William Benzon</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/579</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/579</guid>
      <description>Irving Massey has just published a book that looks most interesting. You can find the TOC,  preface, and first chapter here: </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CFP: special journal issue on evolutionary cultural studies</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:09:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Carroll, Joseph C.</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/578</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/578</guid>
      <description>Hi Everybody, Michael Ryan and Amitava Kumar co-edit an online journal, Politics and Culture: http://aspen.conncoll.edu/politicsandculture/index2.cfm.  They</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mind - How Nonsense Sharpens the Intellect - NYTimes.com</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:05:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>William Benzon</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/577</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/577</guid>
      <description>Keith -- FYI -- BB http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/06/health/06mind.html?hpw</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Norman N. Holland, Literature and the Brain</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:51:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Carroll, Joseph C.</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/576</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/576</guid>
      <description>Thanks, Maya.  Yes, I mean &quot;regulate&quot; in just the way you do: &quot;mitigate, stimulate, control, augment and synthesize the body&#39;s more immediate thoughts and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Norman N. Holland, Literature and the Brain</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:07:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>maya lessov</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/575</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/575</guid>
      <description>Joe, I really like the first two paragraphs below.   The first two long paragraphs.   I didn&#39;t quite think of the imaginative functions as there to regulate</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Norman N. Holland, Literature and the Brain</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeff P. Turpin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/574</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/574</guid>
      <description>Tim--The longer I view Joe&#39;s &quot;adaptive functions&quot; claim, the more seductive it becomes, if you include what, how, and why in that claim.  But I think your two</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Norman N. Holland, Literature and the Brain</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:40:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tim Horvath</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/573</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/573</guid>
      <description>Joe and others, Perhaps I spoke sloppily, as that&#39;s precisely the sort of panning out I was referring to, where an author adduces various explanations and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Norman N. Holland, Literature and the Brain</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:25:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Carroll, Joseph C.</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/572</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/572</guid>
      <description>Is the Wilson/Carroll argument that humans no longer have instincts, or that we no longer rely on them at all, or that we no longer rely on them exclusively? </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Norman N. Holland, Literature and the Brain</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:08:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Carroll, Joseph C.</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/571</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/571</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ll copy below the paragraphs that follow the quick summary of the various adaptive functions people have suggested.  This is from an article on &quot;agonistic</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Norman N. Holland, Literature and the Brain</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:04:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeff P. Turpin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/570</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/570</guid>
      <description>Good.  A provocative spin.  But is the Wilson/Carroll argument that humans no longer have instincts, or that we no longer rely on them at all, or that we no</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Norman N. Holland, Literature and the Brain</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:58:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeff P. Turpin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/569</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/569</guid>
      <description>Well put.  Simply substituting the phrase &quot;one function&quot; for &quot;the function&quot; makes the point.  Lots of tools in the kit. jt Jeff P. Turpin, President Turpin and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Norman N. Holland, Literature and the Brain</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:53:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeff P. Turpin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/568</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/568</guid>
      <description>Hi Tim.  I don&#39;t want to call out any specific authors or approaches on a listserv, (especially when I may be on the job market soon!), but as I am finishing</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Norman N. Holland, Literature and the Brain</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:43:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Carroll, Joseph C.</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/567</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/567</guid>
      <description>Here&#39;s a paragraph from an article in press, on multiple adaptive functions.  A lot of people identify various functions. Boyd usually gets in four or five,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Norman N. Holland, Literature and the Brain</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:41:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>William Benzon</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/566</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/566</guid>
      <description>I¹ve not read it but I¹ve read early drafts of most of the chapters. Yes, it¹s full of ideas. As for the adaptive function of literature, I doubt that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Norman N. Holland, Literature and the Brain</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:20:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tim Horvath</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/565</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biopoet/message/565</guid>
      <description>That should&#39;ve read, Perhaps we are predisposed to come up with unitary explanations as individuals, but as readers, when we pan back and take a look at the</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Thu Dec  3 12:34:55 PST 2009 -->
