buddhist_dialogue_group at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Fwd: Fwd: Agnotology

RichardT — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:45:34 GMT

Fixed! I had long forgotten that my Yahoo ID is tied to my old AOL email address. I haven't checked that in so long that my mailbox is filled up, meaning

Fwd: Fwd: Agnotology

robin beck — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:15:39 GMT

Try: Post message: buddhist_dialogue_group@yahoogroups.com ... From: RichardT Date: Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:05 AM Subject: Re: Fwd:

Fwd: Agnotology

robin beck — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:51:43 GMT

... From: RichardT Date: Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:37 AM Subject: Re: Agnotology To: Rob ... would say if it does not

Fwd: Agnotology

robin beck — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:51:09 GMT

... From: RichardT Date: Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 9:35 AM Subject: Re: Agnotology To: Rob ... away from its original

Re: Agnotology

Rob — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:50:27 GMT

Was that sent to my email intentionally, or was it meant for the board? I would say if it does not feel like compassion, it is not. Karuna has a distinct

Re: Agnotology

Rob — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:31:36 GMT

... Meanwhile, you offer no evidence to prove your erroneous claims about tobacco companies. There are plenty of bad things about some of them; just as there

Re: Agnotology

andyhanlen2000 — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:25:23 GMT

Help me out here, Richard. You write: << You and Robin quickly chimed in to become examples of the kind of agnotological victims he referred to by defending

Re: Agnotology

RichardT — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:11:03 GMT

... The only thing that has drifted is your attention. Read the thread again and you will see that the original post discussed several examples of agnotology.

Re: Agnotology

andyhanlen2000 — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:37:16 GMT

What's most amusing (to me, anyway) is how this thread has drifted away from its original intent. Richard proudly brought out this agnotological silliness to

Re: Agnotology

Rob — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 05:02:31 GMT

... Uhm, I listed the additives that increase the addictive power of nicotine. There are none. There are some 200 additives approved for use in cigarettes.

Re: Agnotology

RichardT — Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:17:33 GMT

... Are we playing whack-a-mole here? First you say there were no additives. When I stand corrected now you argue that there were. I show evidence that

Re: Agnotology

Rob — Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:08:57 GMT

I suppose it would take some intuitive reading comprehension skills. Try harder. r

Re: Agnotology

Rob — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:39:37 GMT

... They stopped adding so much carcinogenic stuff to reduce the nicotine. The nicotine in the natural leaf is quite a bit higher. Same with tars. The

Re: Agnotology

RichardT — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:23:38 GMT

Like our old friend John Petry might say, I note you posted a collection of words here, but their meaning or significance is unknown. Kind regards, Richard

Re: Agnotology

RichardT — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:22:11 GMT

... Looks like I misremembered the stories on the topic. What the additive used to make weeds more addictive was simply... more nicotine: Are tobacco