<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>bus_industry_discussion at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/</link>
    <description>UK Bus Industry Discussion</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: ADMIN   was re:[bus_industry_discussion] Re: Driver CPC.......is</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:04:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Hammond</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2350</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2350</guid>
      <description>I feel the topic has done its course. In many respects as I have explained on this subject before, I fully agree with your points about the cost as I work part</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ADMIN   was re:[bus_industry_discussion] Re: Driver CPC.......isn&#39;t </title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:44:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>somersetdriver</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2349</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2349</guid>
      <description>John If thats your view point, then ok, whatever... However I was airing a valid point...that Funding is rapidly drying up for the &quot;free&quot; courses. So why do</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ADMIN   was re:[bus_industry_discussion] Re: Driver CPC.......isn&#39;t </title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:01:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Hammond</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2348</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2348</guid>
      <description>I rather think this topic has had its time on this group, there are those agree and those who don&#39;t and it seems no rational middle ground. Therefore can we</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Driver CPC.......isn&#39;t it expensive!</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:23:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>somersetdriver</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2347</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2347</guid>
      <description>I heard today that the funding pot for &quot;free&quot; courses is either running out or has indeed already run out.  The NVQ training being done in conjunction with</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Driver CPC.......isn&#39;t it expensive!</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:54:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Andrew Fear</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2346</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2346</guid>
      <description>... Well, it addresses almost half of the cost you&#39;ve identified in your previous posting. On the occasions i&#39;ve done it, as it runs with an early start, i&#39;ve</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Driver CPC.......isn&#39;t it expensive!</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:15:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>somersetdriver</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2345</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2345</guid>
      <description>I certainly wouldn&#39;t like to trust that one of these far eastern empires of the mighty EU will have the same rigourous standards as here in the UK. Its the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Driver CPC.......isn&#39;t it expensive!</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:14:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Andrew Fear</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2344</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2344</guid>
      <description>I&#39;m doing my third day of training next week and, as it comprises part of a vocational BTEC course, its not costing me nor my employer anything. Any &quot;get out</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Driver CPC.......isn&#39;t it expensive!</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 12:25:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>somersetdriver</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2343</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2343</guid>
      <description>Driver CPC. I wont rant on (too much) with my views on it, because that is a waste of time, it&#39;s the law and so be it. However, the cost angle has continued to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: (slightly) off topic: section 44  (terrorism act)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:42:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Cooper</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2342</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2342</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ve seen no indication of cost but it seems &#39;Liberty&#39; assisted Graeme wrote: Did it indicate how much it cost to take the police to court about this?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: (slightly) off topic: section 44 (terrorism act)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:20:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Cooper</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2341</guid>
      <description>Regretably this is still in force and will remain so until the Goverment appeal against the judgement [up to 3 months] is heard and the U.K. law is amended</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: (slightly) off topic: section 44 (terrorism act)</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:05:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Graeme Palmer</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2340</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2340</guid>
      <description>Did it indicate how much it cost to take the police to court about this?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(slightly) off topic: section 44 (terrorism act)</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:03:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tom Brant</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2339</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2339</guid>
      <description>Hi all,

after reading rail magazine, one of their articles was about section 44 of the terrorism act.

From what i read, 2 enthusiasts had taken the police to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Revenue protection inspections... A waste of money</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:55:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Philip Longdon</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2338</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2338</guid>
      <description>In totally agreeing with the points made in defence of the Revenue Inspectors&#39;&#39; role, it would concern me that they seem confined to the inner city. Whilst,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Revenue protection inspectons... A waste of money or a vital job</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:22:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Hammond</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2337</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2337</guid>
      <description>As Andrew comments, fraud can be both passenger based and unfortunately driver based also. The temptation of handling hundreds of pounds in a day can sometimes</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Revenue protection inspectons... A waste of money or a vital job</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:16:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Andrew Huggon</dc:creator>
      <link>http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2336</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bus_industry_discussion/message/2336</guid>
      <description>Revenue Inspectors are there as much to ensure that drivers are not defrauding the company as to check on passengers.  And given recent legal cases in the</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Mar 28 17:56:47 PDT 2010 -->
