<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>canroads at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/</link>
    <description>Canadian roads and highways</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Highway 69/400 open from Sudbury to Estaire</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:38:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stephane Dumas</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26048</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26048</guid>
      <description>At this point I would probably just renumber the whole thing 400. The 406, for instance, still has a 2-lane section in Welland, and there have been other </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time for a Canadian Autobahn?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:27:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>captainbeowulf</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26047</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26047</guid>
      <description>... I largely agree with Rick, but I just want to add that - as with a road system - sometimes you have to think about transit as a network, rather than simply</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Highway 69/400 open from Sudbury to Estaire</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:17:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>captainbeowulf</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26046</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26046</guid>
      <description>... At this point I would probably just renumber the whole thing 400.  The 406, for instance, still has a 2-lane section in Welland, and there have been other</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time for a Canadian Autobahn?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:05:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rick Perez</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26045</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26045</guid>
      <description>Up until now, I was unfamiliar with the man, but comparing your description of him to Wikipedia&#39;s makes you sound just as extremist.  Perhaps Canadian</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Highway 69/400 open from Sudbury to Estaire</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>flowersongbird06</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26044</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26044</guid>
      <description>It appears it will be signed as Highway 69 as long as it is discontinuous from the 400 southern part. The section around Nobel is supposed to open next year</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Highway 17 west of Sudbury</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:40:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>captainbeowulf</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26043</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26043</guid>
      <description>Here&#39;s another RAQS that we missed: looks like we should see an EA site coming up soon for a new highway 17 freeway westwards to around Espanola.  It&#39;s still</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Highway 69/400 open from Sudbury to Estaire</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:06:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>captainbeowulf</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26042</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26042</guid>
      <description>http://news.ontario.ca/mndmf/en/2009/11/highway-69-expanded-between-sudbury-and-estaire.html Highway 69 Expanded Between Sudbury and Estaire November 12, 2009</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time for a Canadian Autobahn?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:08:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>captainbeowulf</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26041</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26041</guid>
      <description>... I agree with Guy here - and I think in part you get guys on the right like Wendel Cox because various people on the left have been stridently pushing the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time for a Canadian Autobahn?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:25:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>o773r</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26040</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26040</guid>
      <description>... Precisely. That&#39;s not to say that parts of his &#39;Autobahn&#39; dream are not good ideas for Canada, it&#39;s just that Cox is fighting his own reputation here. Most</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time for a Canadian Autobahn?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:21:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gofastrrr</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26039</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26039</guid>
      <description>... And a lot less bitter, biased language: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendell_Cox I&#39;m not a fan of right-wing politics, but I would have to say that I agree</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time for a Canadian Autobahn?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:03:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>i42</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26038</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26038</guid>
      <description>Uh, Wendell Cox is a rabid pro-car anti-planning anti-transit anti- social-responsibility nutcase who is a master of twisting numbers to create &quot;statistics&quot;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time for a Canadian Autobahn?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:53:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gofastrrr</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26037</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26037</guid>
      <description>... Care to elaborate? Guy Olsen, PE(NJ), PTOE</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time for a Canadian Autobahn?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:18:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dmuzika</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26036</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26036</guid>
      <description>The author has some good ideas, but I agree that because of Canada&#39;s small population density, we can&#39;t construct freeways for the sake of freeways.  There are</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time for a Canadian Autobahn?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:47:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>o773r</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26035</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26035</guid>
      <description>... Too bad the article is coming from Wendel Cox. Nobody is going to take it seriously. Personally, I have some reservations towards that report. I don&#39;t</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Time for a Canadian Autobahn?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:39:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>captainbeowulf</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26034</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/canroads/message/26034</guid>
      <description>What is seldom considered in these arguments is that Canada probably has one of - if not the - lowest population densities of all developed countries (G7, G8,</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Thu Dec 17 11:00:22 PST 2009 -->
