<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>capital_defense_weekly at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/</link>
    <description>Capital Defense Weekly</description>

    <item>
      <title>for cases since 10/26/2009</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:31:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karl_keys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/314</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/314</guid>
      <description>Two Monday morning opinions from the Supreme Court dominate this edition.  The first is the per curiam decision in Bobby v. Robert J. Van Hook</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for the weeks since October 12, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:44:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karl_keys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/313</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/313</guid>
      <description>Leading off this edition is the Supreme Court&#39;s decision in Joseph Corcoran v. Levenhagen &lt;http://supremecourtus.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-10495.pdf&gt; . The</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for the weeks since October 5, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:51:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karl_keys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/312</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/312</guid>
      <description>Following a week that was light on published opinions, this week&#39;s edition is likewise light on new decisions. In the news the Todd Willingham </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for the weeks since September 21, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:49:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karl_keys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/311</guid>
      <description>This edition leads off with developments in Ohio. A Sixth Circuit panel stayed the upcoming execution of Lawrence Reynold </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for the weeks since September 14, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 04:02:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karl_keys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/310</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/310</guid>
      <description>Leading off this week is the Illinois Supremes Court&#39;s holding in People v. Laurence Lovejoy </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for the weeks since September 7, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:12:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karl_keys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/309</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/309</guid>
      <description>Leading off this week are two decisions, the Florida Supreme Court&#39;s TimothyLee Hurst v. State </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for the weeks since August 24, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:02:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Karl Keys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/308</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/308</guid>
      <description>Numerous defense favorable cases are noted in this edition covering cases since late August.  Leading off, the Sixth Circuit in Gregory Thompson v. Bell</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for cases decided August 17, 2009 to August 24, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:34:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karl_keys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/307</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/307</guid>
      <description>The Tenth Circuit&#39;s opinion in Michael Lee Wilson v. Workman &lt;http://www.ck10.uscourts.gov/opinions/06/06-5179.pdf&gt; , en banc, leads off this week.  The Wilson</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for cases decided August 10, 2009 to August 17, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:05:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karl_keys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/306</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/306</guid>
      <description>By now everyone has an opinion of the Court&#39;s order in In re Troy Davis &lt;http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/court-order-Dav\ is.pdf&gt; , and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for cases decided August 3, 2009 to August 10, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:01:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/305</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/305</guid>
      <description>As the summer winds down, as often happens, the number of opinions in capital cases declines.  Of note this week is the affirmance of a divided Fifth Circuit,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for cases decided July 27, 2009 to August 3, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:30:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/304</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/304</guid>
      <description>Leading off this week&#39;s is the revised opinion in Keith Thurmond v. Quarterman &lt;http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/unpub/08/08-70008.1.wpd.pdf&gt; . Initially</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for cases decided July 20, 2009 to July 27, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 04:02:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/303</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/303</guid>
      <description>Leading off this week is the South Dakota Supreme Court&#39;s opinion in Briley Piper v. Weber &lt;http://www.sdjudicial.com/opinions/downloads/y2009/24868.pdf&gt; .</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for cases decided July 13, 2009 to July 20, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:31:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/302</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/302</guid>
      <description>Leading off this edition is the Delaware Supreme Court&#39;s decision in James Cooke v.  State </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for cases decided July 6, 2009 to July 13, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:35:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/301</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/301</guid>
      <description>Leading off this edition is the stay issued by the  United States Supreme Court in Paul Powell v. Kelly </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for cases decided June 22, 2009 to July 6, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:41:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/299</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/299</guid>
      <description>Leading off this edition is Herman Lindsey v. State &lt;http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/decisions/2009/sc07-1167.pdf&gt; .  In Lindsey </description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Tue Nov 10 14:34:57 PST 2009 -->
