<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>capital_defense_weekly at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/</link>
    <description>Capital Defense Weekly</description>

    <item>
      <title>for cases decided from June 15, 2009 to June 22, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:25:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/298</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/298</guid>
      <description>Capital Defense Weekly Leading off this week is the Supreme Court&#39;s latest exploration of the Confrontation Clause,  Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for cases decided from June 1, 2009 to June 15, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:58:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/297</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/297</guid>
      <description>Leading off this edition is the Supreme Court&#39;s decision in District Attorney&#39;s Office for Third Judicial Dist. v. Osborne </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(no subject)</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:31:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/296</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/296</guid>
      <description>A &quot;full edition&quot; of the weekly isn&#39;t running for a fairly unusual reason, Lexis &amp; FindLaw are showing no reported capital cases from any of federal circuits or</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for cases decided from May 18, 2009 to June 1, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:05:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/295</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/295</guid>
      <description>Two SCOTUS cases kick off this edition, as well as follow-up on Daryl Atkins of Atkins v. Virginia fame. The first of the two SCOTUS case is Montejo v.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for cases decided from May 11, 2009 to May 18, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 10:53:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/294</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/294</guid>
      <description>Two trial court wins &quot;kick off &quot;this edition. The first win is noted by DPIC &lt;http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/exonerations-jury-acquits-former-death-\ </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>or cases decided from May 4, 2009 to May 11, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 03:34:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/293</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/293</guid>
      <description>The Fourth Circuit in Justin Wolfe v. Johnson &lt;http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/088.P.pdf&gt;  has remanded noting that the Commonwealth&#39;s only witness</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for cases decided from  April 27, 2009 to May 4, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:34:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/292</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/292</guid>
      <description>The death sentence of Michael Ray Burgener &lt;http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S116882.PDF&gt;  has been remanded four times in 23 years. Most</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for cases decided from April 20, 2009 to April 27, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 12:58:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/291</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/291</guid>
      <description>Cone v. Bell &lt;http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/08pdf/07-1114.pdf&gt; dominates this edition. Turning to the experts, </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for cases decided from April 6, 2009 to April 20, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:32:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/290</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/290</guid>
      <description>This &quot;double edition&quot; brings two previously unreported &quot;wins.&quot; The Fifth Circuit in an unpublished opinion, John Adams v. Quarterman </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for cases decided from March 30, 2009 to April 6, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 03:09:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/289</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/289</guid>
      <description>Leading off this edition, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on Wednesday in Ex parte Gene Wilford Ha thorn, Jr. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for cases decided from March 23, 2009 to March 30, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:46:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/288</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/288</guid>
      <description>Leading off this edition is the Supreme Court&#39;s holding in Harbison v. Bell &lt;http://www.scotuswiki.com/index.php?title=Harbison_v._Bell&gt; . The nutshell holding</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>For cases decided from March 16, 2009 to March 23, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 02:35:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/287</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/287</guid>
      <description>Leading of this edition is the Tenth Circuit&#39;s decision in Yancy Lyndell Douglas &lt;http://www.ck10.uscourts.gov/opinions/01/01-6094.pdf&gt;  &amp; Paris LaPriest</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for cases decided from March 9, 2009 to March 16, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:45:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/286</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/286</guid>
      <description>Leading off the week is the repeal of New Mexico&#39;s death penalty &lt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/mar/19/new-mexico-death-penalty-ba\ n&gt; .  Effective for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for cases decided from March 2, 2009 to March 9, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:14:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/285</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/285</guid>
      <description>[My apologies to those who received two copies of the email edition this week.  I initially sent out the &quot;rough draft&quot; to the list rather than the final draft.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>for cases decided from March 2, 2009 to March 9, 2009</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:02:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karlkeys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/284</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/capital_defense_weekly/message/284</guid>
      <description>A large number of favorable opinions are being reported this edition, including two missed last week and multiple Supreme Court justices commenting on the</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Jul  6 16:35:42 PDT 2009 -->
