<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>caplet at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/</link>
    <description>The Caplet Group</description>

    <item>
      <title>W2SP 2012 CFP - Web 2.0 Security and Privacy 2012 Workshop Call for </title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:02:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Larry Koved</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/349</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/349</guid>
      <description>W2SP 2012 CFP - Web 2.0 Security and Privacy 2012 Workshop Call for Papers On behalf of the workshop co-chairs and program chair, we would like to invite you</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ADsafe[]</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:37:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Douglas Crockford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/348</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/348</guid>
      <description>... This is the Firefox distribution I see at Yahoo: 4.0   1.60% 3.6  21.78% 3.5   2.99% 3.0   1.93% 2.0   0.39%</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ADsafe[]</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:37:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Brendan Eich</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/347</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/347</guid>
      <description>... So, fixed in Firefox 3.5 and 3.6 patch releases. Firefox 4 is out already. Is anyone seeing hits from downrev Firefoxes? /be_._,___</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ADsafe[]</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:28:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Douglas Crockford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/346</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/346</guid>
      <description>... https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507453 http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2009/07/14/hidden-firefox-properties-revisited/</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ADsafe[]</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 03:08:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Freeman, Tim</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/345</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/345</guid>
      <description>Care to post a citation for the Firefox[-6] bug?  Google doesn&#39;t do a very good job searching for [-6].  Sounds pretty bizarre, if -1, -3, and -6 are special. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ADsafe[]</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 01:38:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Douglas Crockford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/344</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/344</guid>
      <description>ADsafe took a big usability hit when the Firefox[-6] bug was discovered. ADsafe took the necessary but highly undesirable step of outlawing the use of the []</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[W2SP] Web 2.0 Security and Privacy 2011 Workshop - Call for Papers</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 02:50:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Larry Koved</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/343</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/343</guid>
      <description>Final reminder!  Submissions are due next Friday. Thanks. On behalf of the workshop co-chairs and program chair, we would like to invite you participate in the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[W2SP] Web 2.0 Security and Privacy 2011 Workshop - Call for Papers</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:02:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Larry Koved</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/342</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/342</guid>
      <description>Reminder: The submission date is March 25, two weeks from tomorrow. On behalf of the workshop co-chairs and program chair, we would like to invite you</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[W2SP] Web 2.0 Security and Privacy 2011 Workshop - Call for Papers</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:28:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Larry Koved</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/341</guid>
      <description>On behalf of the workshop co-chairs and program chair, we would like to invite you participate in the 5th annual workshop on Web 2.0 Security and Privacy.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ADsafe</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:46:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Douglas Crockford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/340</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/340</guid>
      <description>I updated the ADsafe DOM interface. Previously, a method like .getValue() could return undefined a single value an array of values depending on the number of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: adsafe</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:00:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Douglas Crockford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/339</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/339</guid>
      <description>... Quite right. Thank you very much.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: adsafe</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:59:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Nagy Endre</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/338</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/338</guid>
      <description>I mean calling the reject_name function with a name it returns true or false. For instance if I call reject_name(&#39;constructor&#39;) than i will get true because </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: adsafe</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:47:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Douglas Crockford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/337</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/337</guid>
      <description>... On some browsers, accessing the constructor style would return a function, which is not desirable, so an exception is raised instead.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>adsafe</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:29:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>forewer2000</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/336</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/336</guid>
      <description>Hi all, In the adsafe.js I found that the reject_name(name) function is used at three location in this &quot;procedural&quot; form. Ex. at line 1087 : getStyle: function</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ADSAFE.lib</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:17:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Douglas Crockford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/335</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/335</guid>
      <description>ADSAFE.lib now subjects its name parameter to the same rules used generally on properties. Ankur Taly had discovered an attack by using a particular banned</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr4.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed May 16 12:32:11 PDT 2012 -->

