<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>caplet at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/</link>
    <description>The Caplet Group</description>

    <item>
      <title>CFP: W2SP 2010: Web 2.0 Security and Privacy 2010</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:50:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Collin Jackson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/310</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/310</guid>
      <description>This is announcement of the call for papers for the fourth in a series of successful workshops on topics related to security and privacy for Web 2.0. This</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ADsafe</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:52:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tyler Close</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/309</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/309</guid>
      <description>What&#39;s the recommended idiom for iterating over the elements of an array? I had been using: for (var i = 0; i !== v.length; i += 1) { var element = v[&#43;i]; ... </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>adsafe.js</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 00:15:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Douglas Crockford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/308</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/308</guid>
      <description>... This produces a bunch from which all text nodes containing only whitespace are removed I added these bunch methods: .each(func) The function is called for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ADsafe</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:20:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Douglas Crockford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/307</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/307</guid>
      <description>The ADsafe verifier now rejects programs that use the arguments pseudo array. The ADsafe verifier now rejects programs that use expressions with the subscript</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>adsafe.js</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:47:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Douglas Crockford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/306</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/306</guid>
      <description>I repaired some leakage in the ADsafe Ajax library. Grateful thanks to John Mitchell, Sergio Maffeis, and Ankur Taly. http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~maffeis/ I also</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [Caja] Re: More undocumented silliness in Firefox/SpiderMonkey</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:39:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mike Samuel</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/305</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/305</guid>
      <description>We should add tests though to make sure we stay invulnerable to that. 2009/7/29 Mike Stay &lt;metaweta@...&gt; ... We should add tests though to make sure we</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FBJS2 -- The bad news and the good news</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:31:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>marcel.laverdet</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/304</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/304</guid>
      <description>Hey I wanted to let you guys know that for now I&#39;m discontinuing research on FBJS2. Basically at this time instead we&#39;re focusing on Facebook Connect (external</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ADsafe bugs?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:39:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Douglas Crockford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/303</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/303</guid>
      <description>... The fault was mine. Please ask Joel to try it again.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ADsafe bugs?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:56:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Adam Barth</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/302</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/302</guid>
      <description>Hi folks, Joel was playing around with ADsafe today and noticed that the verifier seems to be broken at the moment.  For example, this widget passes the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ADsafe banned list</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 23:24:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tyler Close</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/301</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/301</guid>
      <description>... What about stack overflow? ... I did the testing during the caja security review and I believe I got an exploit working in both IE 6 and Firefox 2 on</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ADsafe banned list</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 22:38:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Brendan Eich</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/300</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/300</guid>
      <description>... I&#39;d like to know too -- you can throw an object that you could return, so that&#39;s not it. Is it the ES3 spec bug, not implemented by many browsers, where</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ADsafe banned list</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 21:57:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tyler Close</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/299</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/299</guid>
      <description>On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Douglas Crockford ... Javascript&#39;s catch is also problematic since it enables catching of stack overflow and out of memory</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ADsafe banned list</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 14:50:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Douglas Crockford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/298</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/298</guid>
      <description>... I do not understand the value in preventing information leaks here. What is the hazard? I am considering the blocking of try/catch in ADsafe. I am</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ADsafe banned list</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 01:08:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Douglas Crockford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/297</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/297</guid>
      <description>I slimmed down the ADsafe banned list. These are the names of members that may not be accessed. This list is now: arguments callee caller constructor eval </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fwd: Techtalk on EcmaScript 5</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 03:00:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mark S. Miller</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/296</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/caplet/message/296</guid>
      <description>... From: Mark S. Miller &lt;erights@...&gt; Date: Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:52 PM Subject: Techtalk on EcmaScript 5 To: &quot;es5-discuss@...&quot;</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Mar 28 17:49:51 PDT 2010 -->
