<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>cheapthreads at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/</link>
    <description>cheap_threads</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Is Embedded cheap threads MISRA C compliant</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:15:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Scott McKellar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/82</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/82</guid>
      <description>Is Cheap Threads MISRA compliant?  In a word, no. Since I had never even heard of MISRA before I saw your post, I obviously have made no effort to comply with</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Embedded cheap threads MISRA C compliant</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 07:57:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jadhav_shubhangi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/81</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/81</guid>
      <description>Hi, I want to use the Embedded version of cheap threads in our software and it&#39;s a requirement that all our software is MISRA C compliant. Is Embedded cheap</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Myriad: a server framework using Cheap Threads</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 05:00:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Scott McKellar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/60</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/60</guid>
      <description>I recently stumbled across a website that says nice things about Cheap Threads.  Well, I didn&#39;t exactly stumble on it, I was Googling. Anyway here&#39;s the URL</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: hi all its roshan</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:41:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Scott McKellar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/55</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/55</guid>
      <description>Depending on how you write to the serial port, Cheap Threads probably won&#39;t help you.  The Cheap Threads web site mentions this point on the Pros and Cons </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>hi all its roshan</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 07:52:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dol_roshan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/54</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/54</guid>
      <description>im a student im new to this library i need help to run multi tasking in C i need to process the data and simultaniously send it through serial port through a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Documentation for ct_return()</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 17:27:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Scott McKellar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/53</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/53</guid>
      <description>After almost a year, I have finally updated the documentation on the Cheap Threads website to reflect the new ct_return() function.  See my last couple of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Release of new ct_return() function</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 04:11:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Scott McKellar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/28</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/28</guid>
      <description>I installed a new release of Cheap Threads that includes the new ct_return() function.  I described this function in my posting of October 19.  In brief, it</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: C&#43;+ class method to be called by scheduler</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2003 15:52:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Scott McKellar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/26</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/26</guid>
      <description>You can&#39;t call a C&#43;+ member function directly from C. In the case of a non-static member function, the compiler arranges to pass an additional parameter -- a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>C&#43;+ class method to be called by scheduler</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2003 14:34:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Antz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/25</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/25</guid>
      <description>Greetingz all. Once again I have stumbled across a problem using the Cheap_Threads C-code in conjunction with my own C&#43;+ code. The story goes a bit like</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Prerelease: new ct_return() function</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2003 03:37:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Scott McKellar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/23</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/23</guid>
      <description>The attachments are new prerelease versions of the files ct.h and ctsched.c, implementing a new function ct_return(). This function is intended to be called</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Watchdog function &amp; others ?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 17:50:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Josef Bueger (VI/ABG)</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/22</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/22</guid>
      <description>Thanks for the fast answer! ... From: Scott McKellar [mailto:mck9@...] Sent: 08 October 2003 05:23 To: cheapthreads@yahoogroups.com Subject:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Watchdog function &amp; others ?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 03:23:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Scott McKellar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/21</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/21</guid>
      <description>... wrote: &lt;snip&gt; ... better. What sort of improvement would you like to suggest? ... If a thread gets caught in an endless loop, there&#39;s nothing that Cheap</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Watchdog function &amp; others ?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:30:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>seabueg</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/20</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/20</guid>
      <description>Hi! I was searching of some kind of &quot;of target simulation&quot; environment for embedded systems. We are using different kind of RTOS systmes for our products (PABX</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: request for help and investment partnership. HOAX DONT FALL FOR</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2003 14:03:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Scott McKellar</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/19</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/19</guid>
      <description>As list owner I have already deleted the message in question, along with a couple of earlier spams.  That&#39;s why, if you look at the full message archive, there</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: request for help and investment partnership. HOAX DONT FALL FOR</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2003 10:22:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>xcelcior</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/18</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cheapthreads/message/18</guid>
      <description>I too was offered a &quot;very&quot; similar offer and it ended up as a hoax. Unfortunately, I lost $200 for this. ... Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free,</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Jul  6 03:08:51 PDT 2009 -->
