chrissbiblestudy at Yahoo! Groups

Re: interpreting 1 Cor. 14

Jim E — Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:37:38 GMT

... Exactly right! And HOW were the words written? They were NOT written in isolated verses! They were written as a part of a complete letter to a specific

Re: interpreting 1 Cor. 14

Ndmtn4me@... — Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:25:38 GMT

Jim, It appears that Paul unveiled many issues of error to these professing Corinthian Christians, but with each issue Paul also gave the spiritual remedy

Re: interpreting 1 Cor. 14

Jim E — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:44:08 GMT

... Actually, the key verse in the entire discussion is verse 36, when Paul asks all of the Corinthians: "What? came the word of God out from you? or came it

Re: interpreting 1 Cor. 14

APsit190 — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:44:46 GMT

... Roger, The Corinthian letters were written to a church that was, as Ray Stedman put it, "A church in crisis." It was a church that had multiple issues and

Re: interpreting 1 Cor. 14

Ndmtn4me@... — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:41:01 GMT

Jim, That's pretty good, I can appreciate your points of view here. You mention vs.16-40 which seem to be contextually focused with the issue of abusing the

Re: interpreting 1 Cor. 14

Jim E — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:52:30 GMT

... Roger, I am assuming you mean, why do I believe that people speaking in tongues in Corinth were doing so to address the assembled congregation rather than

Re: interpreting 1 Cor. 14

Ndmtn4me@... — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:55:40 GMT

Jim, How do you see in the scriptures that these Corinthians were speaking to one another in tongues? I don't think vs.23 implies that scenario. It does

Re: evidence from a Mormon on prophecy

Jim E — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:49:19 GMT

... Let me agree that "the cultural, historic and literary overtones play a HUGE role in" the defining the DIFFERENCES between biblical interpretations. The

Bible Trivia Game, 1/5/2010, 8:00 pm

Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:57:23 GMT

Reminder from: chrissbiblestudy Yahoo! Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chrissbiblestudy/cal Bible Trivia Game Tuesday January 5, 2010 8:00 pm - 10:00 pm

Re: evidence from a Mormon on prophecy

Emmanuel Reagan — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:07:29 GMT

Jim, I like the way you said what you said in the email below. I have been increasingly thinking about interpretation of Scriptures, especially after I

Re: evidence from a Mormon on prophecy

APsit190 — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:39:54 GMT

... Jim, I quite agree with you there. But one thing it seems you could have also added in there is where Scriptures are taken out of context, misquoted,

Re: evidence from a Mormon on prophecy

Jim E — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:19:18 GMT

... might regard?<<< Roger, I am not sure if you understand what I mean by context. There is only one context--the situation to which an entire book is

Re: evidence from a Mormon on prophecy

Jeffrey Pruitt — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:05:19 GMT

Like you Joseph, I suspect most visions of the Virgin Mary, Jesus, angels etc. are probably delusions or hallucinations. But that doesn't mean that every

Online Bible Study, 1/6/2010, 4:00 pm

Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:01:10 GMT

Reminder from: chrissbiblestudy Yahoo! Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chrissbiblestudy/cal Online Bible Study Wednesday January 6, 2010 4:00 pm - 5:00 pm

Re: evidence from a Mormon on prophecy

Jim E — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:45:05 GMT

... What I mean is when one chooses to ignore or override historical, cultural, and literary context in favor of what one believes "the Spirit" tells him or