<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>climatechangepolitics at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/</link>
    <description>Climate Change</description>

    <item>
      <title>Ed Miliband statement on Copenhagen</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:30:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Nissen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9603</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9603</guid>
      <description>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2010-01-05a.42.0 Cheers from Chiswick, John</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Engineering Lessons from Dubai - a City State Where Construction</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:17:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Nissen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9602</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9602</guid>
      <description>Albert wrote: &quot;The sadness of the Burj Khalifa approach in real life and the geoengineering is that the former is a tomorrow&#39;s folly while the latter becomes</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lord Lawson on geoengineering!</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:50:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Energy Meister</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9601</guid>
      <description>I must agree with Malcolm Scott here. I believe the agenda of these &#39;former&#39; nay sayers is now to twist and turn until people forget all they have said in the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [clim] Fwd: The Etc Geoeng report</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 18:06:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Nissen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9600</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9600</guid>
      <description>Hello Lee, Thank you for your timely response, for a promising start to the New Year!  The debate about what to do over global warming is hotting up, after</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lord Lawson on geoengineering!</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 13:54:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Malcolm Scott</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9599</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9599</guid>
      <description>I&#39;m surprised you&#39;re applauding this guy. Do you think that &quot;relatively modest&quot; is enough? Apart from this he proposes to do absolutely nothing. He describes</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lord Lawson on geoengineering!</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:13:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Nissen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9598</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9598</guid>
      <description>Time for a Plan B! http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704905704574622663468634576.html referring to his Op-Ed here: </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [clim] does energy conservation lead to poorer use of fossil fue</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:27:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Nissen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9597</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9597</guid>
      <description>Here is a U-tube video giving a good rationale for the &quot;feebate&quot; - carbon tax and rebate - also advocated by the eminent climate scientist, Prof Jim Hansen: </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: copenhagen</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:58:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Malcolm Scott</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9596</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9596</guid>
      <description>Would this Olivine act as an anti fertiliser? Is that why they want to spread it with fertiliser and does that mean extra fertiliser would be needed wherever</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fwd: The Etc Geoeng report</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:47:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Malcolm Scott</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9595</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9595</guid>
      <description>I would prefer that CO2 was in the solution. i.e. avoid and/or remove CO2 rather than add a further complication. There must be some downsides to launching</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fwd: The Etc Geoeng report</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:53:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Nissen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9594</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9594</guid>
      <description>Andrew Lockley has done an excellent critique of the latest Etc Group report into geoengineering.  I am forwarding this to two climate groups, one of which was</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: copenhagen</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:11:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>charles goodnight</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9593</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9593</guid>
      <description>by the time it gets so bad that we go into emergency mode the feedback mechanisms will be so well established and powerful that we won´t be able to stop them</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: copenhagen</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:12:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Nissen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9592</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9592</guid>
      <description>&quot;Putting carbon in the ground&quot; was meant to cover putting carbon in the soil or in mines. One could store carbon or CO2 away in other ways too. That wasn&#39;t the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: copenhagen</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:00:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>csceadraham</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9591</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9591</guid>
      <description>In http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9589 John Nissen writes, ... &quot;The vacuous agreement at Copenhagen was predictable...&quot; and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: copenhagen</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:58:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Climate Concern UK</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9590</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9590</guid>
      <description>John, (Catching up with emails) Well done to get a long letter published. Regards Peter H Climate Concern UK 01325 378452 www.climate-concern.com </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: copenhagen</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:58:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Nissen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9589</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/climatechangepolitics/message/9589</guid>
      <description>Survival is the word. What should be done for civilisation to survive? I was encouraged to write a couple of letters last week, and the one to The Independent</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Thu Jan  7 00:30:12 PST 2010 -->
