<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>cloudy_simulations at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/</link>
    <description>Cloudy - plasma simulations</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Single Stellar Populations</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:05:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter van Hoof</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/886</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/886</guid>
      <description>Hi Rob, Alternatively, if neither Starburst99 or PopStar suit your needs, you can fairly easily incorporate other grids by making your own .ascii file. A full</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Single Stellar Populations</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:34:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jarle Brinchmann</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/885</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/885</guid>
      <description>Hi Rob, You can use Starburst99 and PopStar SSPs at least. See the wiki: http://wiki.nublado.org/wiki/StellarAtmospheres Cheers, Jarle.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Single Stellar Populations</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:36:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>wiersmarp</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/884</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/884</guid>
      <description>Hi there, I was looking over the &#39;table stars&#39; command, and it wasn&#39;t completely clear to me whether there are input spectra only for single stars or for SSPs</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Line opacity as a function of depth</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:56:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>lindastrubbe</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/883</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/883</guid>
      <description>Hi John, Thanks for your reply.  I think for the moment, I&#39;ve found a way to approximately calculate what I need well enough without that command.  But I might</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: helium dominated abundances</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:19:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ryan L Porter</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/882</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/882</guid>
      <description>Hi Bert, Yes, you can specify abundances relative to hydrogen that are greater than unity.  There are several such models in the test suite.  One example is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Line opacity as a function of depth</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:26:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Everett</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/881</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/881</guid>
      <description>Hi Linda, I hope somebody will correct me if I&#39;m wrong, but I don&#39;t think Cloudy has a command for that, at least not yet. But, I was once interested in the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Line opacity as a function of depth</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:20:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>lindastrubbe</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/880</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/880</guid>
      <description>Hello, I was wondering if there is a way to have Cloudy punch the absorption opacities of lines as a function of depth in the cloud.  I&#39;m looking for something</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: element scale factor</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:54:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter van Hoof</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/879</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/879</guid>
      <description>Hi Bert, Rajib, Rajib is correct. The preferred spelling in Cloudy is &quot;sulphur&quot;, which is the British spelling, and the US spelling &quot;sulfur&quot; is not recognized.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pumping contribution to Hbeta</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 03:01:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gary Ferland</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/878</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/878</guid>
      <description>... they should all agree, and should all be zero.  so i am confused too. ... a quick look at the source suggests that your original interpretation should be</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>helium dominated abundances</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:15:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>coldfir1784</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/877</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/877</guid>
      <description>Hey all, I have a more difficult question than I have asked in the past which goes more to the heart of how cloudy works. I want to input my own abundance</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pumping contribution to Hbeta</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:46:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>valentina_viridiana</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/876</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/876</guid>
      <description>Hi again, it seems this message has gone unnoticed. Any help? Thanks, Valentina</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: element scale factor</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:52:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rajib Ganguly</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/875</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/875</guid>
      <description>Hi Bert,       According the Hazy, the Cloudy-preferred spelling of that element is &quot;Sulphur&quot; (Table 16).  I don&#39;t know which is the &quot;correct&quot; spelling</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>element scale factor</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:41:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>coldfir1784</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/874</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/874</guid>
      <description>Hey, I have been messing around with different abundances and ran across an interesting issue. Using element scale factor works great for every element I&#39;ve</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Incident Continuum?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:17:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter van Hoof</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/873</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/873</guid>
      <description>Hi, ... correct. ... All you need to do is divide nuJnu by the photon energy, which is given in infinite mass Rydberg (R_inf). See section 3.5 of Hazy 3. Then</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>pumping contribution to Hbeta</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:30:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>valentina_viridiana</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/872</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/872</guid>
      <description>Hi all, I&#39;m confused about the right way to go about the pumping part of Hbeta. I&#39;m computing models without pumping in three different ways (with &quot;no induced</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Dec  2 13:24:50 PST 2009 -->
