<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>cloudy_simulations at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/</link>
    <description>Cloudy - plasma simulations</description>

    <item>
      <title>countdown to C10 ....</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:53:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gary Ferland</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/894</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/894</guid>
      <description>Greetings, It is our intention to release a new version of Cloudy every two years.  We are approaching the 2-year anniversary of C08 and are making plans for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: &quot;every&quot; option nor working with &quot;punch ionizing continuum&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:52:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gary Ferland</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/893</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/893</guid>
      <description>Hi Christophe this was a bug and is fixed in the development version.  I also added the every option to the other two sets of commands. thanks for the help, </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FeXVII lines</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:28:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter van Hoof</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/892</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/892</guid>
      <description>Hi Stefano, I have committed the changes. They should be in the next release. Thanks again for the help! Peter. ... -- Peter van Hoof Royal Observatory of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FeXVII lines</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:00:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>burkinafaso76</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/891</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/891</guid>
      <description>Hi Peter, I calculated the temperatures at 10^5 K, with the CHIANTI IDL routines. This is outside the range where the cs are actually evaluated in CHIANTI, but</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FeXVII lines</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:49:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter van Hoof</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/890</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/890</guid>
      <description>Hi Stefano, I am finally getting around to incorporating this into Cloudy. I will move the M2 line into level1.dat so that we don&#39;t have to delete a line from</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&quot;every&quot; option nor working with &quot;punch ionizing continuum&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:57:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>chris_morisset</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/889</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/889</guid>
      <description>In the Hazy manual, I saw the following 14.38.14. punch ionizing continuum [options] This creates a file that can be used to indicate ionization sources.  If</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Incident spectrum problem</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:25:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gary Ferland</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/888</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/888</guid>
      <description>Hi there, it is getting the right answer - the radio brightness temperature is VERY large.  make a plot of the incident radiation field with data from the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Incident spectrum problem</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:19:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dhuppenkothen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/887</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/887</guid>
      <description>Hello, I have recently started using cloudy and am now trying to use it to model the effect of a blackhole binary on the environment. I am using an incident</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Single Stellar Populations</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:05:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter van Hoof</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/886</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/886</guid>
      <description>Hi Rob, Alternatively, if neither Starburst99 or PopStar suit your needs, you can fairly easily incorporate other grids by making your own .ascii file. A full</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Single Stellar Populations</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:34:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jarle Brinchmann</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/885</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/885</guid>
      <description>Hi Rob, You can use Starburst99 and PopStar SSPs at least. See the wiki: http://wiki.nublado.org/wiki/StellarAtmospheres Cheers, Jarle.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Single Stellar Populations</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:36:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>wiersmarp</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/884</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/884</guid>
      <description>Hi there, I was looking over the &#39;table stars&#39; command, and it wasn&#39;t completely clear to me whether there are input spectra only for single stars or for SSPs</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Line opacity as a function of depth</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:56:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>lindastrubbe</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/883</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/883</guid>
      <description>Hi John, Thanks for your reply.  I think for the moment, I&#39;ve found a way to approximately calculate what I need well enough without that command.  But I might</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: helium dominated abundances</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:19:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ryan L Porter</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/882</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/882</guid>
      <description>Hi Bert, Yes, you can specify abundances relative to hydrogen that are greater than unity.  There are several such models in the test suite.  One example is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Line opacity as a function of depth</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:26:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Everett</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/881</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/881</guid>
      <description>Hi Linda, I hope somebody will correct me if I&#39;m wrong, but I don&#39;t think Cloudy has a command for that, at least not yet. But, I was once interested in the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Line opacity as a function of depth</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:20:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>lindastrubbe</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/880</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/880</guid>
      <description>Hello, I was wondering if there is a way to have Cloudy punch the absorption opacities of lines as a function of depth in the cloud.  I&#39;m looking for something</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Nov 22 01:22:03 PST 2009 -->
