<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>cloudy_simulations at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/</link>
    <description>Cloudy - plasma simulations</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: How to reproduce the calculation of Ross 1979 Apj 233:334</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:17:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gary_ferland</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/768</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/768</guid>
      <description>Hi there, the fix for the thrown assert is now on the Hot Fixes page of the Cloudy web site.  Please edit the file to make the fix, recompile, and run the Ross</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: interpolating Starburst99 on age AND metallicity</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:38:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>chris_morisset</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/767</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/767</guid>
      <description>Hi Pete! Thanks a lot, it seems to me it&#39;s working fine. I tried before to run a grid on Z saying to Cloudy it was age! It worked fine, but the user have to be</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: He I 2SP3 and neutral heavy ion fractions depend on assumed FeII</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:10:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Kirk Korista</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/766</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/766</guid>
      <description>Hi Gary and Ryan, Let me go out on a limb and suggest a possible explanation for my question at the bottom of the post below. As I&#39;ve written below, naively I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: He I 2SP3 and neutral heavy ion fractions depend on assumed FeII</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:33:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Kirk Korista</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/765</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/765</guid>
      <description>... Gary and Ryan, So if you&#39;ve taken look at the 3 recent plots (Lya_Fe_xxx.ps) that Doug Edmonds has posted, there are enormous differences in the Lya </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: He I 2SP3 and neutral heavy ion fractions depend on assumed FeII</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:15:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Kirk Korista</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/764</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/764</guid>
      <description>Hi Gary and Ryan, Thanks for your help and insight. I respond below to Gary&#39;s statements, with a remaining question at the end. ... Ok, yes, that&#39;s about what</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: He I 2SP3 and neutral heavy ion fractions depend on assumed FeII</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:59:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>doug_edmonds@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/763</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/763</guid>
      <description>Hi Kirk, I have posted three more plots. These are OTS_Fe_default.ps, OTS_Fe_99.ps, and OTS_Fe_371.ps. The relative column densities of several neutral atoms</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: He I 2SP3 and neutral heavy ion fractions depend on assumed FeII</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:22:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>doug_edmonds@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/762</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/762</guid>
      <description>Hi Gary, I have posted the plots you requested. They are Lya_Fe_default.ps, Lya_Fe_99.ps, and Lya_Fe_371.ps. Cheers, Doug</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: He I 2SP3 and neutral heavy ion fractions depend on assumed FeII</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:21:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gary J. Ferland</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/761</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/761</guid>
      <description>We might cut to the chase and look at the Lya destruction rates.  This is column 9 of the punch hydrogen lya command.  What does Lya destruction vs depth look</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Radio flux densities</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:04:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter van Hoof</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/760</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/760</guid>
      <description>Hi Laurence, Since the output gives nuFnu it is not possible to give output in Jansky, that would have the wrong dimension. What you could do is the following.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: He I 2SP3 and neutral heavy ion fractions depend on assumed FeII</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:18:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ryan Porter</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/759</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/759</guid>
      <description>Gary, I don&#39;t disagree with anything you wrote, but none of it explains the differences between C07 and C08.  Kirk, does C07 show the slower depopulation for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: He I 2SP3 and neutral heavy ion fractions depend on assumed FeII</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gary_ferland</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/758</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/758</guid>
      <description>Hi Kirk, here are a few things that I think are happening. in its default state the code does FeII with the lowest 16 levels as in the real atom, then the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: He I 2SP3 and neutral heavy ion fractions depend on assumed FeII</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:25:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ryan Porter</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/757</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/757</guid>
      <description>Hi Kirk and Doug, Thanks for checking into this.  These are interesting results.  It looks to me increasingly likely that the new line overlap treatment is </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>He I 2SP3 and neutral heavy ion fractions depend on assumed FeII ato</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:57:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Kirk Korista</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/756</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/756</guid>
      <description>Hi, The 3 recently posted postscript plots (Fe_16.ps, Fe_99.ps, Fe_371.ps) are the result of an experiment that I asked Doug to run. The input parameters are</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Radio flux densities</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:05:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Laurence Sabin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/754</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/754</guid>
      <description>Dear Peter, Is there a way to directly have the output intensities in Jansky instead of erg/s ? I did not find anything in the 3 Hazy documents. Laurence PS:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: interpolating Starburst99 on age AND metallicity</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:08:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter van Hoof</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/753</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/753</guid>
      <description>Hi Christophe, Thanks for the grid! I had to fix a few problems though. Most notably comments are not allowed in *.ascii files, so I removed those. The fixed </description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Jul  4 10:19:37 PDT 2009 -->
