<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>cloudy_simulations at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/</link>
    <description>Cloudy - plasma simulations</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: An assert has been thrown in the file helike_level.cpp</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 19:36:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gary_ferland</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/487</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/487</guid>
      <description>Hi Patrizia The problem that caused the assert that you caught had been fixed on our development branch some time ago.  The simulation failed differently with</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: An assert has been thrown in the file helike_level.cpp</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:05:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter van Hoof</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/486</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/486</guid>
      <description>Hi Patrizia, Looking a bit more at your test case, there may be another way out of this. The BB temperature you have below is extremely high, even for a PN. I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: An assert has been thrown in the file helike_level.cpp</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 11:31:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter van Hoof</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/485</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/485</guid>
      <description>Hi Patrizia, We can reproduce the problem, but I am not sure when there will be a solution. It seems everybody is stressed out at the moment... Sorry, Peter. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XSPEC mtable redshift parameters</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:51:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bryan Armentrout</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/484</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/484</guid>
      <description>Checking the OGIP Memo 92-009, I see that the redshift parameter is actually added by XSPEC, and not generated during the Cloudy run. Cloudy just sets the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Line emission in an open geometry</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 19:11:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David R. Ardila</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/483</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/483</guid>
      <description>Dear Peter and Nick First of all, thanks for the tips. They are very much appreciated, although they give very different answers! What I&#39;m trying to do is to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XSPEC mtable redshift parameters</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 17:00:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bryan Armentrout</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/482</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/482</guid>
      <description>Is there any way to modify the Cloudy-produced XSPEC mtables to allow the redshift parameter to be negative during XSPEC fitting?  This situation could arise</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Line emission in an open geometry</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 12:30:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter van Hoof</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/481</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/481</guid>
      <description>Hi David, I am not entirely clear on what you are asking. The incident spectrum will be treated as a continuum by Cloudy (even though some of it may be line</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>An assert has been thrown in the file helike_level.cpp</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 08:16:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>patrizia.manzitto</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/480</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/480</guid>
      <description>Hi! Cloudy has done this error: Iteration  54 Chisq=  2.96898e&#43;02 ************************************************** RADIUS= 16.185995 BLACKbody=5.596353 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Line emission in an open geometry</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:12:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>nicholas_p_abel</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/479</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/479</guid>
      <description>Hi David, I think the command you want to use is &quot;print line inward&quot;, which is described in part 1 of hazy.  Using this command will tell you the fraction of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Line emission in an open geometry</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:27:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David R. Ardila</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/478</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/478</guid>
      <description>Hi All I&#39;m trying to calculate line fluxes as seen from the shielded face of a cloud in an open geometry, but I don&#39;t quite understand the output I am getting.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: contiuum_mesh.dat</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:11:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ryan Porter</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/477</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/477</guid>
      <description>Hi Emily, It looks like this is just an overzealous sanity check.  You should be able to disable it without any problems.  Just find the loop at line 526 of </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hot fixes and botched asserts</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:08:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter van Hoof</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/476</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/476</guid>
      <description>... I get a thrown assert with g&#43;+ 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2 p1.0.2) on AMD64 in optimized mode in auto/func_grid.in: PROBLEM DISASTER An assert has been thrown,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROBLEM DISASTER    Cloudy version number is 07.02.01</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:52:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter van Hoof</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/475</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/475</guid>
      <description>Hi Patrizia, I cannot reproduce this problem on my machine. But you could try altering line 1218 of grains.cpp to GrnStdDpth_v = </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROBLEM  qheat did not converge grain  sil-ism03 in zone 1209.. </title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:04:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter van Hoof</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/474</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/474</guid>
      <description>Hi Patrizia, This problem is known and only has minor influence on your results. There is no workable solution for it other than writing a fundamentally </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PROBLEM  qheat did not converge grain  sil-ism03 in zone 1209.. &quot;ERR</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:43:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>patrizia.manzitto</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/473</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudy_simulations/message/473</guid>
      <description>Hi! I apologize with you because the last mail was wrong. Cloudy has done the error: Iteration   1 Chisq=  1.97185e&#43;02 </description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.scd.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun May 11 20:00:44 PDT 2008 -->
