<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>cmmi_process_improvement at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/</link>
    <description>CMMi Process Improvement</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggest KPI for quality group</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:24:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rommy</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16878</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16878</guid>
      <description>... I actually discussed this with my team, similar to bug which has severity and priority attributes, the same can be applied to Non Compliance. NC can be</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggest KPI for quality group</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:54:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>EDWARD F WELLER III</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16877</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16877</guid>
      <description>When setting up any measure that is input to evaluation or decision making, it is useful to check what happens when the numerator or denominator get very small</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Product Vision and Product Roadmap</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:51:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>vibhanshu2</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16876</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16876</guid>
      <description>Dear All, i have a query Is the Product/ System Solution Vision and the Product/ System Solution roadmap is one of the saem thing? and which comes first</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggest KPI for quality group</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:13:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Heather Oppenheimer</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16875</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16875</guid>
      <description>Hi Prashant, I think what Pat was suggesting (in his inimitable way) is that KPIs should be based on process value.  Yes, you can certainly measure inputs and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggest KPI for quality group</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:11:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16874</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16874</guid>
      <description>The KPI should be based on the value you expect to get out of the team. If the quality group is responsible for auditing, you can require a certain number of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggest KPI for quality group</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:10:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rommy</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16873</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16873</guid>
      <description>Thanks for the inputs Prashant. They&#39;re very helpful. regards, Rommy</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggest KPI for quality group</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:04:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Anton Evers</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16872</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16872</guid>
      <description>Pat, I agree with your quote &quot;What gets measured gets manipulated!&quot;, but especially when there is a reward connected to it. If you just use measurements to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggest KPI for quality group</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:52:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rommy</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16871</guid>
      <description>Thanks Pat! You&#39;re right :-)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggest KPI for quality group</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:52:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>prashant.swaroop@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16870</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16870</guid>
      <description>All, I am not sure if I got the original question right. KPI should be based on the key process activity –input and outputs. For Audits and Process</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggest KPI for quality group</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:49:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Patrick OToole</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16869</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16869</guid>
      <description>Jeff, Unfortunately, that would be deemed a major weakness against PPQA GP2.5 and would likely prevent the organization from achieving ML2.  Knowing how to use</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggest KPI for quality group</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:46:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Patrick OToole</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16868</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16868</guid>
      <description>Rommy, A quote often attributed to Peter Drucker is, &quot;What gets measured gets done!&quot;  A quote often attributed to Pat O&#39;Toole is, &quot;What gets measured gets</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggest KPI for quality group</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:19:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rommy</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16867</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16867</guid>
      <description>Pat and Jeff, thanks for the suggestion. Quality Group Call Ratio looks like a good one. regards, Rommy</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggest KPI for quality group</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeffrey Dalton</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16866</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16866</guid>
      <description>Rommy,   How about: all of them!   Jeff ... From: Patrick OToole &lt;PACT.otoole@...&gt; Subject: Re: [CMMi Process Improvement] Suggest KPI for quality group </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggest KPI for quality group</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:27:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Patrick OToole</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16865</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16865</guid>
      <description>Rommy, Try this on for size - the &lt;Quality Group Call Ratio&gt; should be 1.25 or higher. The denominator of the &lt;Quality Group Call Ratio&gt; is the number of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: When to choose SVC vs DEV?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:59:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mike Phillips</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16864</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement/message/16864</guid>
      <description>Ed, These are excellent questions that, in my view, cannot be easily answered by &quot;the SEI.&quot; Eileen Forrester has shared that at least one organization chose to</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Mar 28 16:21:26 PDT 2010 -->
