<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>cmsig at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/</link>
    <description>CMSIG</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: System Measurements</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 18:53:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Spyros Bonatsos</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1515</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1515</guid>
      <description>Hi Adail, I do not doupt that TOC gives a new meaning to things. I just wonder how do you measure a sub - system a warehouse for example or the purchasing</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: System Measurements</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 16:51:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Adail Retamal</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1514</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1514</guid>
      <description>Hi, Spyros! I worked in wholesale and distribution some 8 years ago. As a Software Engineer, I was in charge of developing a simulator for the price list and </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: System Measurements</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 16:34:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Spyros Bonatsos</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1513</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1513</guid>
      <description>Clarke, Thanks for the reply. I do not know if I have understood your answer 100% but let me try - distribution fleet is a system - as a system it must be</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: System Measurements</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:48:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Clarke Ching</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1512</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1512</guid>
      <description>Spyros, If you did have a volume or weight measurement, rather than money, then can you put yourself in the shoes of someone measured that way who is under</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>System Measurements</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:26:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Spyros Bonatsos</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1511</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1511</guid>
      <description>Hello everybody, In TOC world three measurements are accepted: Throughput, Inventory (or Investment) and Operating expense. Throughput it is the rate at which</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MPG illusion</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:24:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Clarke Ching</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1510</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1510</guid>
      <description>That&#39;s interest Claire. I never thought of the cash flow approach. Makes sense now that more people are concerned about the cost of fuel than before. My</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MPG illusion</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:13:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Clare Maday</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1509</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1509</guid>
      <description>Clarke, I believe there are two issues here. The appropriate measure; gallons of gas or money. I prefer the cash flow approach. The second issue is tweaking. I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MPG illusion</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:24:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Pauker, Stephen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1508</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1508</guid>
      <description>But given my focus on health etc, I wonder if the example can be adapted to applying resouces to increasing thruput with a fixed bed/nurse complement, ie,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MPG illusion</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:16:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Clarke Ching</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1507</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1507</guid>
      <description>I think you&#39;re right.  I feel foolish, in retrospect :) ... -- Clarke Ching www.clarkeching.com &#43;44(0)7920114893</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MPG illusion</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 13:37:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Pauker, Stephen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1506</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1506</guid>
      <description>is the spin not finding the right measurement--- not mpg but just g?? If you have the wrong measurement, you get the wrong result! Steve Stephen G. Pauker, MD,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MPG illusion</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 12:36:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Clarke Ching</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1505</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1505</guid>
      <description>Hi everyone, I think you&#39;ll all enjoy this.  I&#39;m trying to put a TOC spin on it ... but maybe I am over-reaching. The magic of low-hanging fruit Imagine that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New product vs. New feature</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 05:53:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Fred Wiersma</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1504</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1504</guid>
      <description>Jack, It&#39;s only a conflict FOR YOU if you can&#39;t support both groups in your working hours (say, 40h/week). If so, talk to your manager, and/or the first person</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New product vs. New feature</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:24:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Richard E. Zultner</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1503</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1503</guid>
      <description>I see no conflict between selling existing products and developing new products. I see no conflict between expanding sales of existing products and developing</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New product vs. New feature</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:41:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Clarke Ching</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1502</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1502</guid>
      <description>Can you do both, Jack? ... -- Clarke Ching www.clarkeching.com &#43;44(0)7920114893</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New product vs. New feature</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 21:56:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jack Vinson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/1501</guid>
      <description>Thanks everyone.  All valid feedback.  I know that the cloud was rather wet.  I&#39;m in the midst of these discussions, and I wanted input from someone who wasn&#39;t</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr3.grp.scd.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Jul  6 13:54:10 PDT 2008 -->
