<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>cmsig at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/</link>
    <description>CMSIG</description>

    <item>
      <title>Eli&#39;s new book</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:33:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Clarke Ching</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2293</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2293</guid>
      <description>Just in case you hadn&#39;t noticed ....Eli Goldratt&#39;s new business novel &quot;Isn&#39;t It Obvious&quot; is very nearly out. It&#39;s an excellent book, this time looking at the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Russell Ackoff</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:43:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Clarke Ching</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2292</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2292</guid>
      <description>Hi everyone, I&#39;ve just discovered that Russell Ackoff &lt;http:&gt;, the great systems thinker, passed away earlier this week. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Constraints Accounting-via Management Dynamics</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:59:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>denison_rick</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2291</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2291</guid>
      <description>Has anyone used John and Pamela Caspari&#39;s book to implement a GAAP compliant Constraints Accounting approach as described in the book? I know John had been</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MTA versus MTS</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:51:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Humberto Baptista</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2290</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2290</guid>
      <description>Hi Santiago, Yes, but don&#39;t forget the logical ramifications of MTS: not only you need more protective capacity, but you need to maintain it. Also there is a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MTA versus MTS</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:04:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jack Vinson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2289</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2289</guid>
      <description>Ahah!  I think that was the key that I finally got out of SCM at Warp Speed. With MTO, you monitor the service levels and when your quoted lead time starts</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MTA versus MTS</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:36:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Santiago Velásquez Martínez</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2288</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2288</guid>
      <description>OK, and if we were to define that MTA is what applies (in accordance to company&#39;s marketing strategy), then, the only operational difference would be to ensure</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MTA versus MTS</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:58:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Humberto Baptista</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2287</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2287</guid>
      <description>Hi Santiago, Don&#39;t worry the difference is subtle and elusive :-) In a TOC environment we do NOT engage in supply partnerships while producing MTS. Only when</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MTA versus MTS</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:52:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Santiago Velásquez Martínez</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2286</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2286</guid>
      <description>Hi HB, Yes I am aware that in TOC we limit to the maximum the use of forecasts, and that they are still implicit in our model.  At least the &quot;damage&quot; is much </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MTA versus MTS</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:40:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Humberto Baptista</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2285</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2285</guid>
      <description>Hi Santiago, 1. Not exactly. The MTA production is normally to replenish a certain stock level (the &quot;target level&quot;), so it can be considered a real consumption</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MTA versus MTS</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:05:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Santiago Velásquez Martínez</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2284</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2284</guid>
      <description>Thanks Humberto, your explanation helps. Two things: 1.  Does that mean that in MTA we produce to forecast? 2.  I don&#39;t recall in the MTS approach producing</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MTA versus MTS</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:36:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Humberto Baptista</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2283</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2283</guid>
      <description>Hi Santiago, MTA means produce things before you have orders aiming to have a portfolio available. This implies a number of things including a certain amount</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MTA versus MTS</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:41:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Santiago Velásquez Martínez</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2282</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2282</guid>
      <description>Hello dear friends, I have been looking into the newest Make to Availability material of TOC, which is variant of the Make to Stock (MTS) environments, but I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Throughput Accounting Question</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:46:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Cloves Almeida</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2281</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2281</guid>
      <description>I might add that payroll and direct costs (factory maintenance, energy, some machine depreciation, etc.) are also added to standard Finished Goods Inventory.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Throughput Accounting Question</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:52:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bryan McNamara</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2280</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2280</guid>
      <description>Justin No. OE as TA defines it is not on the balance sheet but It can be assembled easily from the P and L statements I have seen. Sent from my iPhone. Bryan</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Throughput Accounting Question</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:59:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Justin Roff-Marsh</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2279</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmsig/message/2279</guid>
      <description>Bryan OE doesn&#39;t appear on a balance sheet, does it? I suppose you could guess it if you assumed an average payment lead-time. Justin From:</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Dec  5 05:09:28 PST 2009 -->
